flash Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #15 · Which Canon body do you use for weddings? | |
Chris Cooke wrote:
The body now-a-days is just as important and your lenses. When I started and was shooting film, the body wasnt as important. The lens and film is where you got your IQ. I dont think a person calling themselves a "professional" wedding photographer should show up with a Digital Rebel, I think it undermines the profession. If the photographer is a part time, a friend of the B&G or a "shoot and burn" then I can understand, and it shows that the B&G went with budget over quality and experience. If a client is paying good money for a photographer that photographer should be equipped with gear that reflects their price not making it look like they had a camera and thought they would give wedding photography a shot. Call me a snob, an a-hole or whatever but its my opinion. When I got married I wouldnt have hired anyone who told me there were going to show up with a 300D or 350D, or a D40 or D80.
If it were me I would make my decision on the images produced by these cameras, not the cameras themselves. After all there are a lot of sensational photographers using a 400 D and just as many shooting garbage on a 1Ds Mk III. I know of a wedding photographer who used a single Leica M6. Super difficult. Stunning images. Booked out years inadvance. Probably most of the guests thought it was a toy. I'm sure the couple only cared about the end result. Looks can be deceiving after all.
Gordon
|