timothfarrar Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #12 · Bracketing For HDR Question?? | |
How different is to make a HDR blend using PS CS2 against using FFDD?
What are the advantages of using FFDD besides noise reduction and sharpening?
Does FFDD work with PS CS2 for PC or is it just for MAC? or is it a stand-alone software??
How good or bad is to use the same RAW image, just adjusting the exposure and saving it into 3 or 4 different files??
Sorry for not getting back to this thread earlier! Here are some answers to your questions,
1. FFDD HDR blend is better than PS CS2 HDR blend in cases where you have motion between frames. FFDD also allows you to tweek the HDR blend when it is done so that if you wanted to you can exclude areas from individual exposures from being included in the final HDR output.
2. Some other FFDD Advantages:
NO HDR artifacts (ie, glow, halo, graying effect, etc) : FFDD includes methods to develop an HDR image naturally similar to how you would develop a 11 stop extended latitude (high dynamic range) film negative in a chemical darkroom (single digital exposure has a little over 5 stops of dynamic range for comparison).
Batch processing : Ability to do all the HDR blending for many photographs over night.
Zone Display Tool : Highlights a tonal zone in the image to aid in development.
Enlargment : Tools to upres with a 2x enlargement that looks sharper and more detailed than the orgional unsharpened raw file.
Feel free to download the examples and see with your own eyes,
http://www.farrarfocus.com/ffdd/examples.htm
3. FFDD works on both the PC and Mac version of PS CS2.
4. Simply re-using a single digital negative, changing the exposure, and then blending, will do nothing for the quality of an image. All the noise in this one digital negative will show up in the final image.
However, developing a single exposure as you would an extended dynamic range image (with graduated adjustments to brightness and contrast to properly expose the light and dark areas of a photograph) will also produce a good image, but just with a lot more noise than starting with a blended negative.
|