Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Reviews · Hosting

	Moderated by: guardian
	Username   Password Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell FM Forum Rules Nikon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews FM Forums | Nikon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload end

George61d Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #1 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB go get it at www.adobe.com Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 11:07 AM

OzPic Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #2 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB George61d wrote: go get it at www.adobe.com ACR 3.2 Update does not mention the D2X http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html?camerarawnav Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 12:39 PM

Art Dickinson Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #3 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB The D2X was already added in ACR 3.1 Art Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 01:39 PM

Roel Online Buy and Sell: On p.1 #4 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Art Dickinson wrote: The D2X was already added in ACR 3.1 Art That is true... *and* ACR 3.2 supports "as shot" WB for the D2x - so hopefully this encryption nonsense with Adobe/Nikon is over. Wonder if the colour from ACR is as good as NC now? Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 01:57 PM

George61d Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #5 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Art Dickinson wrote: The D2X was already added in ACR 3.1 Art please read very carefully the title. I know D2x support was released in 3.1. Its the WB feature that is added in 3.2. hence the title of this post. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 04:17 PM

George61d Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #6 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB OzPic wrote: George61d wrote: go get it at www.adobe.com ACR 3.2 Update does not mention the D2X http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html?camerarawnav Your quite right it does not mention it explicitly. I followed a link from Rob Galbraith which gives a more comprehensive set of features in this release. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 04:20 PM

jmcfadden Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #7 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Tonight I will do some tests by swapping out Camera raw 3.1 with 3.2 and if I have the time , which I won't most likely I will publish the results some one beat me to this please J Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 04:57 PM

maljo Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #8 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Be sure to purge your cache so you can see the new white balance in the thumbnail view of Bridge. maljo Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 05:50 PM

Milkman Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #9 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Well here is a couple of comparisons. I have Camera Raw calibrated and this is basically a straight dump using the techniques that Reznick uses to process the image for each photo. One in Nikon capture and the other in CS2. I know that some will quibble that I should just do a straight dump, but for my testing it's for workflow and I wanted to see which looks best for me. I converted to we using the same action in photoshop. Just to up the ante a little I will not list until later which one is which so take your best guess. And then there is this photo Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 05:51 PM

Jack OBrien Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #10 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Here's a sample of my results. I am impressed that ACR 3.2 correctly reads WB. ACR 3.2 gives me the exact same WB as NC, so that is a huge plus. Jack Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 06:06 PM

Milkman Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #11 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Interesting Jack. I post pictures of women and you post pictures of trains. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 06:25 PM

Jack OBrien Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #12 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Milkman wrote: Interesting Jack. I post pictures of women and you post pictures of trains. She said no Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 06:30 PM

Art Dickinson Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #13 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Art Dickinson wrote: The D2X was already added in ACR 3.1 Art please read very carefully the title. I know D2x support was released in 3.1. Its the WB feature that is added in 3.2. hence the title of this post. Yes...I knew this ! My answer was in response to a previous question on why the D2X was not listed by Adobe in the new release info. Art Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 27, 2005 at 10:33 PM

George61d Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #14 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Art Dickinson wrote: Art Dickinson wrote: The D2X was already added in ACR 3.1 Art please read very carefully the title. I know D2x support was released in 3.1. Its the WB feature that is added in 3.2. hence the title of this post. Yes...I knew this ! My answer was in response to a previous question on why the D2X was not listed by Adobe in the new release info. Art My apologies Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 07:44 AM

realeyz Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #15 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Hallaluja!!! I am SOO SOO glad this issue is now taken care of. Finally these companies come together to fix a train wreck of a problem. A nice change of pace. If you are listening Nikon, I applaud you for giving the power BACK to the photographer. Lets just please keep it this way in the future huh? Cheers Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 11:07 AM

stevemya Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #16 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Jacko, I have Nikon D70 and I have ACR 3.1. But, I don't have the corect WB when the image is opened. Should I change to "as shot" in the WB drop window? Thanks. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 01:18 PM

jmcfadden Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #17 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB stevemya wrote: Jacko, I have Nikon D70 and I have ACR 3.1. But, I don't have the corect WB when the image is opened. Should I change to "as shot" in the WB drop window? Thanks. As shot will be the Auto Setting in the camera at the time , or it will be a preset like sunny etc. If you are saying that if you set the camera to cloudy (look up in your manual what the kelvin temp is for cloudy) annd ACR is reporting to you something like 5500K (basically a sunny day) then you have some weird issue, BUT. If you are saying that ACR is reading it fine as far as cloudy=cloudy in ACR but the color still looks funky , then that is a whole different animal alltogether. Gotta understand that You are really the final arbitor of what is right or wrong in the file, are you on a calibrated rig? J Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 01:30 PM

stevemya Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #18 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB So, I have to set ACR to what ever setting I used in canera. Right. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 01:46 PM

jmcfadden Offline Image Upload: On p.1 #19 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB stevemya wrote: So, I have to set ACR to what ever setting I used in canera. Right. Basically they should be the same or pretty close, are you using ACR 3.2? If not please go and update your software and see if that helps. Also what firmware version are you on in the camera? This is vital information to help you , there have been at least 2 firmware updates for the camera and you just gotta have all these ducks in a row to get anywhere with these computers errrrrrr , cameras J Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 01:48 PM

stevemya Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #20 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB I have updated my camera to 2.00 A&b. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 02:03 PM

Jack OBrien Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #21 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB If ACR is working like it should, no matter what you set your camera to, that should be the 'as shot' in ACR. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 03:07 PM

camey Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #22 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Okay Milkman, I'll bite. The first image is NC and the second is ACR. The first has the characteristic skin tone smoothing and yellow shift I see in NC and the second has the warmer reds and better detail that I've come to associate with ACR. Also NC has a bug where it produces red/brown splotches around fine hair over skin (see upper right hairline where it meets forehead. Edited on Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM Sep 28, 2005 at 05:41 PM

Milkman Offline Image Upload: Off p.1 #23 · ACR 3.2 available with D2X/2HS WB Thank you camey, I was waiting patiently for someone to ask me that question. You are indeed correct. I like them both for different reasons. I can say that I like NC because of the pleasing "look" that it has although I would say that ACR is more close to the "real" thing as they say. I can say that she liked the NC, but also felt that the ACR version was more realistic. Chris Sep 28, 2005 at 06:07 PM

	FM Forums | Nikon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload end

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password   Lost password?