Jman13 Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #1 · So what's the deal with AF on the FE 28-70? | |
So, I'm testing the FE 28-70 for potential purchase to have a lens that's convenient for tripod work stopped down on the cheap, and I'm finding that optically it's a pretty good lens. Up close, I'm getting fantastic results, with things look usable even into the corners. Of course, things are softer there than in the center, but not bad at all, really.
However, at wider focal lengths, I've noticed that the outer 50% of the frame has been utterly dreadful when focused further away, and I just couldn't figure it out. Then a few people mentioned poor AF accuracy and I started checking, and seriously: What the heck is going on here?
I noticed that when focusing further away than about 2-3m, the camera will show what appears to be a pretty accurate measurement of focus distance from me to the point I'm focusing on. Problem is, the lens isn't actually focused at that point at all. There appears to be some sweeping away field curvature at the wide end here, but I'm assuming this is due to PDAF being used on my A7 II instead of contrast detect...it detects the distance and moves the lens there. Problem is, this sucker focuses WAY past infinity at the wide end, and when focusing on a subject, say, 15m away, this is already beyond infinity for the outer regions of the frame. Focus at 4m or so and f/8, and everything is nice and sharp across the frame.
The question is, why, with this hybrid AF, does Sony not use PDAF to get the lens close, then finalize position with CDAF, like most hybrid systems do in single shot? It would seem to solve this issue that apparently many have. It's not a deal-breaker for me, as most of my work with this lens would be on a tripod anyway, and for the times it wouldn't be (general purpose work with people or sorts), I'd probably be closer up, where it seems to do fine with accuracy. But still...this really shouldn't be happening. Especially because I'm sure the engineers who designed the 28-70 know it has this behavior.
Anyway, for outdoor work and any moderately distant stuff, this is a manual focus lens, IMO. In that scenario it does fairly well. See the examples below. This is at 28mm, f/11, near the lower left corner of the frame. Now, 28mm appears to be one of the weaker areas of this lens anyway, but when manually focused, it's at least usable. Autofocus (and the AF point was put on the bottom of the tree at this framing), and it's complete garbage.
Here's the test scene (just random park/road). This is the AF frame, BTW:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2015/28test.jpg
100% crop AF:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2015/28testAF.jpg
100% crop MF:
http://www.jordansteele.com/2015/28testMF.jpg
|