Upload & Sell: On
| p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · colorspace - argyll vs spyder 4 comparison |
So I came across this site for doing 3d comparisons of colorspaces -
I decided to upload profiles made with my new Spyder 4 Express. One made with the included Datacolor software, the other made with Argyll. Despite everything I've read about Argyll being better, I was a bit shocked to see the results graphed.
It appears that the profile made with the Datacolor software covers a bit more in the reds, pinks, greens and yellows, while the argyll profile covers only a tiny bit more in the blues and violets. Everything else, from every angle of the 3d model, is virtually identical.
Mind you, I'm new to this whole CM thing. But am I interpreting this the way I'm presenting it? I can in fact verify the Datacolor presenting slightly more greens and yellows. If I switch my profile to that one, there is a very slight, but barely noticeable, yellowish green color cast applied. The Argyll profile presents grays more naturally. But what am I going to lose in the reds and pinks if I stick with this profile?
If you have the Cortona3d plug-in installed, here's the 3d model -