Hello, I have a Nikon D300 and I want to renew my team. I usually do nature photography, wildlife, macro and landscape.
My question is about changing my equipment completely by a Nikon D800 , which would have a single FF and DX camera for wildlife or buy a Nikon D600 and Nikon D7100 for the next photographing wildlife.
With the Nikon D800 would only have to take a camera and better AF would have to photograph wildlife.
With the Nikon D600 and D7100, take more weight, and the worst would be the AF that although I have not proven it is said is not very good in low light.
Any advice that you who have tried these two cameras?
thanks
I think that only you can answer your question. D600+D700 has the disadvantage of weight and the advantage of always having a camera ready with its lens. D800 is better if you dont mind changing lens. You have to consider your own "protocol" of going to take pictures. If you hike weight might be an issue. If you mostly drive and walk a little then weight is less of an issue.
ander wrote:
Hello, I have a Nikon D300 and I want to renew my team. I usually do nature photography, wildlife, macro and landscape.
My question is about changing my equipment completely by a Nikon D800 , which would have a single FF and DX camera for wildlife or buy a Nikon D600 and Nikon D7100 for the next photographing wildlife.
With the Nikon D800 would only have to take a camera and better AF would have to photograph wildlife.
With the Nikon D600 and D7100, take more weight, and the worst would be the AF that although I have not proven it is said is not very good in low light.
Any advice that you who have tried these two cameras?
thanks...Show more →
It's always good to have a 2 camera set up IMO. So I'd go for the D600 and D7000 combo.
D600 for macro and landscape
and
D7000 for wildlife
