Upload & Sell: Off
| p.2 #11 · Digirev *PROPER* review of the EOS M |
Sorry you aren't having so much eosfun with this body. I think we would all love to see Canon produce the first full frame interchangeable lens mirrorless system.
Damn right!! For the $2100 MSRP Canon's asking for the 6D, I'd rather have a full frame mirrorless with EVF. It would've been a lighter and more compact camera suitable for the landscape photographers on the go that Canon exec claimed the 6D is aiming at.
We would probably feel different if the FF mirrorless was $3000 and a premium cost for a brand new series of short-flange FF lenses. Granted, it would be cheaper than Leica, . . . probably. But if we get what we want, I'd think it would undoubtedly be beyond the quality level of the 6D.
So, if we get our wish for Canon to build a FF mirrorless system, and it comes in costing nearly as much as the 5D3, we might not be quite so enthused. Right?
For the cost of a 5D3, that FF mirrorless better be one damn good body, but I don't think it would be that expensive.
See how that Sony full frame RX-1 comes with a list price of $2800, but that's because it comes with a fixed Zeiss lens. Take the lens away and the price should be similar with the 6D, if not lower.
I also don't see what Canon could possibly offer in a FF mirrorless that would make it worth as much as the 5D3. Remember, Canon is very smart, if somewhat ruthless, with their product differentiation.