Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2012 · LR 4.2 Raw 7.2 vs DPP 3.11.31 rendered Detail
  
 
DBotting
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · LR 4.2 Raw 7.2 vs DPP 3.11.31 rendered Detail


I am finding for the first time that LR is producing more detail than DPP from CR2. It seems that Canon has been overtaken on their own Raw format.

Are others finding the same?

I am making sure everything is set to zero and the Adobe interpretation of the Canon standard shooting format used. There is quite a noticeable difference. Particularly at 200% where it makes the LR photo look like it was been shot with a sharper lens.

Well done Adobe.



Oct 08, 2012 at 04:01 PM
DBotting
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · LR 4.2 Raw 7.2 vs DPP 3.11.31 rendered Detail


Forget this. I had not zero'd all sharpening. Doh!

Two renderings very close now.

Sorry for wasting peoples time



Oct 08, 2012 at 04:06 PM
abqnmusa
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · LR 4.2 Raw 7.2 vs DPP 3.11.31 rendered Detail


no, I find ACR still does not produce the clean conversions that DPP does.


Oct 11, 2012 at 07:38 PM
wsheldon
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · LR 4.2 Raw 7.2 vs DPP 3.11.31 rendered Detail


I haven't used DPP lately - how does it compare to the latest ACR and Lightroom 4 when it comes to noise control, defringing and lens corrections? I find those features of ACR/LR almost indispensable in cleaning up Canon 20D and 50D images at 800 ISO and removing purple fringing from chrome when using my 85/f1.8 wide open.


Oct 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM





FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Retrive password