I was experimenting with Shutter-preferred, auto ISO, and available light. Action to sharpen strips Exif; posting for the information if anyone cares...
Very cute. The eyes are nicely rendered. Might benefit from a little more hand and wrist (not as tightly cropped from the bottom edge) and perhaps a little noise reduction and carefully selected blur (avoiding changes to the eyes), but they are very minor tweaks.
ben egbert wrote:
Wow, ISO 2200, my camera would have so much noise the kid would appear to have acne. Also f1.4, I was testing an f2.8 lens.
The camera is comparatively new to me, lens seldom used.
I want to get away from extensively using zooms and I enjoy the challenges of available light and both the flexibility and spontaneity afforded for candid images with high ISO and faster primes.
1/1000th of a second? Absolutely, sitting quietly is a rarity for her. Do not be mislead - Define2.0 helped whisk away noise (going beyond ISO1600 gets dicey depending on subject) and I find BW much more forgiving.
AuntiPode wrote:
Very cute. The eyes are nicely rendered. Might benefit from a little more hand and wrist (not as tightly cropped from the bottom edge) and perhaps a little noise reduction and carefully selected blur (avoiding changes to the eyes), but they are very minor tweaks.
Do not be mislead - Define2.0 helped whisk away noise (going beyond ISO1600 gets dicey depending on subject) and I find BW much more forgiving.