Upload & Sell: Off
| p.17 #6 · Sigma DP2 Merrill: Have any of you tried it? |
There becomes a point where you have to wonder if the viewer is looking at the image or simply at the pixels.
A question of what is the actual scene of verses looking for things like blotchiness and color shifts.
If one simply wants to have images that show color shifts, edge sharpness, etc, then it would be far less effort to simply stay inside and shoot some plain white walls rather than make the effort to go outside, hike to a nice scene and try to compose a pleasing photo.
Obviously this is a gear/technical based forum at its core, but I think sometimes we can rather miss the forest for the trees as the old saying goes.
but looking at the pixels rather than the pictures seems to be the main point of the dp2m. the AA less bayerlessness makes 100% viewing look so much better, but to be honest i'm not seeing any major differences at web sizes. maybe i would in print.
it just seems like a camera designed specifically for people that care deeply about pixel peeping, so i'm not surprised to see people caring deeply about the minutia.
Showing an imperfect spot of a picture or a bad action is an endless process of a progress life and nothing is mean or minutiae. What you can see from DP2M now , other people get that look for a decade ago since SD9, so no surprise for them that detail and color, you are newcomers (to Foveon ) and posted and said "wow" to bad pictures, so what do other do?Let you do it again and again?You now tell yourseft what should you do?