Tenn.Jer Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #6 · mid price range telephoto zooms? | |
It...depends...
I was VERY happy with the difference in IQ when I mounted my first 70-200L on my XSI; the 55-250 sort-of-kit-lens is a sharp little performer, but that particular Rebel's 12 mp sensor could easily shine brighter behind a high-quality lens...I've always said that particular Rebel version was the '66 Malibu (or '97 Town & Country Minivan - my how the outlook changes ) of Rebel sensor/Digic combinations...in other words, better than even Canon expected - but, sorry, that's a bit off-topic...
Anyway, how much does the money matter to the friend, relative to the photographs? What are his subjects? Will a middle-of-the-road lens be plenty fine for the 4x6 prints of his playing children, or will he be crouched behind the third-base line waiting for the kid to slide, or bent over under the lip of the dark stage, waiting for an entrance? If that's the case he may need a wider aperture, higher shutter speeds...you know how the situations determine the needs...
The T2i uses the 7D's 18mp sensor, I believe, and should be quite capable of some high resolution on those teeny-tiny photsites...so, to use your analogy, if he's drinking wine for the buzz, the Tamron 70-300 or a 55-250 will produce it, but then he may enjoy the fine nuances of the 70-200L, or a bit of 100L Macro, and maybe even a little sip of your 24-70 2.8L (I checked your profile - depending on just HOW good of a friend... )...
I hope this helps...
Jerry
Oh, and my learning curve from (Nikon) film to (Canon) digital is still...uh, curving, too, so keep on it...
Edit...You got all those great replies above while I was rambling on about old cars, and they're right on, too; I was just feeling a little wordy tonight 
Jerry
|