p.1 #1 · A quick and dirty look at different corrections for 16-35 distortions
Here is a quick and dirty look at the different corrections for 16-35 distortions. Both images made at 16mm. All of them have been reduced to 1500 pixels for the longest side. Would like to hear your comments. It is a quick and dirty comparison, maybe next time I need to do something more elaborate. However, I wanted to see how these different corrections stacked up.
1. No Corrections
2. Corrected in LR4 Auto Lens Profile mode
3. Corrected in Camera Only
4. Corrected in Camera and LR4 Auto Lens Profile mode
p.1 #3 · A quick and dirty look at different corrections for 16-35 distortions
certainly shows the barrel distortion. Really looks like you were shooting downwards in the images. Makes me feel like going for a 24 PC-E instead of another 16-35.
p.1 #6 · A quick and dirty look at different corrections for 16-35 distortions
Thank you Guari for your comments. I think that LR4 is somewhat "over compensating" for the barrel distortions, but that maybe just me "seeing" things.
