Makten wrote:
Very nice images, but that has got to be THE worst CA I've ever seen in my life! Any crops?
It has so much CA, that it can be viewed with 3D glasses.
Olympus doesnt correct CA, only distortion (usually). Panasonic body is needed for correction of this, then its managable (not perfect tho). Depending on software corrections isnt bad as long as you dont want to mount it on something that doesnt have it..
Mescalamba wrote:
It has so much CA, that it can be viewed with 3D glasses.
Olympus doesnt correct CA, only distortion (usually). Panasonic body is needed for correction of this, then its managable (not perfect tho). Depending on software corrections isnt bad as long as you dont want to mount it on something that doesnt have it..
IMO it's very bad that M4/3 standard allows so different approaches to IS, CA correction, etc.
This way it is not a standard
Imagemaster wrote:
"Which lens is better at 300mm, the Oly 75-300mm or the Panasonic 100-300mm?"
+1 I have been looking a good comparison of these lenses for a long time. Another way of stating my question is: "Is the Oly 75-300 worth about $300 more than the Pany 100-300?" Emphasis on the 300mm end is very appropriate...