Home · Register · Software · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              48      
49
       50              577       578       end
  

Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
  
 
xenor
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #1 · p.49 #1 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


It was too stormy to go out the other day so I was farting around in the bathroom with my new love interest, the 35mm f/1.4;




















Feb 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM
Brody LeBlanc
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #2 · p.49 #2 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Just doing some thinking,
If I used the Adobe DNG converter, would I still have the same issues with the resulting DNG as I would with the RAF file?



Feb 14, 2013 at 07:29 PM
monkeycolonel
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #3 · p.49 #3 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Yes, exactly the same.


Feb 14, 2013 at 08:10 PM
Brody LeBlanc
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #4 · p.49 #4 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


monkeycolonel wrote:
Yes, exactly the same.


What would be another program that would have the same batch version?
I want to start switching all my files to DNGs.



Feb 14, 2013 at 08:42 PM
Ssnycshoot
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #5 · p.49 #5 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Hi guys. Nice photos everyone.

I Recieved x-e1 yesterday and im super excited. Just won a contax g28mm 2.8 off eBay. I have few questions and I tried to Google it. Couldn't find any answer.

Does it have smearing or color shift issue on x-e1? If yes how should I correct it, I have light room 4 heard it doesn't work well with Fuji sensors.

Which adapter is best solution? Someone recommended metabne. I believe u can't swap lenses on metabone. Is there any alternative in case I want to add more contax g lens and don't have to buy another adapter?

Thanks in advance.



Feb 14, 2013 at 08:50 PM
Dave McGaughey
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #6 · p.49 #6 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Brody LeBlanc wrote:
What would be another program that would have the same batch version?
I want to start switching all my files to DNGs.


I wouldn't do this unless you also store the original RAW inside the DNG (should be an option for this). This will make your files quite a bit bigger, of course.



Feb 14, 2013 at 09:50 PM
xenor
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #7 · p.49 #7 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


X-E1 with TS-E 90mm







Feb 15, 2013 at 12:05 AM
Kit Laughlin
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #8 · p.49 #8 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Manual focus is very hard on the X-Pro1, since when you click the magnification wheel, it enlarges way too much (10x?). You have to sit down when you do this.
I never really liked the peak-thing on the NEX, it is all over - I prefer doing it with the 4x magnification (9x is too much - I use this for tripod work). Same with the canon, manual focus using live view is doable with 5x, 10x is for tripod. What do you guys think? Very frustrating!!!!


I find the magnification options on the X-E1 work very well, and if on a tripod, the higher mag. absolutely lets you see the in-focus zone move across the image (I was trying out the 50/1.4 Rokkor on the X-E1). From memory, the lower power option is 3x on the X-E1, too (someone correct me here, please).



Feb 15, 2013 at 12:26 AM
KatieInTexas
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #9 · p.49 #9 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


X Pro 1 with 35 and CV 15 - Real Estate Job




























Feb 15, 2013 at 01:25 AM
Brody LeBlanc
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #10 · p.49 #10 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Dave McGaughey wrote:
I wouldn't do this unless you also store the original RAW inside the DNG (should be an option for this). This will make your files quite a bit bigger, of course.

What would be the reason for not doing this? [changing to DNG without original RAW]



Feb 15, 2013 at 01:29 AM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



Dave McGaughey
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #11 · p.49 #11 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Brody LeBlanc wrote:
What would be the reason for not doing this? [changing to DNG without original RAW]


If you do this, you may not be able to process the RAW (now DNG files) in non-Adobe programs. I'm pretty sure CaptureOne, for example, can't read the X-Trans when in a DNG format.



Feb 15, 2013 at 03:57 AM
justruss
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #12 · p.49 #12 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


The bigger question, Brody, is why you'd want to do that in the first place?

As I understand it you wouldn't be gaining flexibility in processing-- you'd be losing it.



Feb 15, 2013 at 08:09 AM
Jochenb
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #13 · p.49 #13 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


X-E1 + 35/1.4 (OOC jpeg, astia):


Layers by Jochen-B, on Flickr

Edited on Feb 15, 2013 at 11:24 PM · View previous versions



Feb 15, 2013 at 10:37 PM
jjf88
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.49 #14 · p.49 #14 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


X pro 1 with the 35mm 1.4 shot raw...ACR processed with 10 points of clarity added








Feb 15, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Dave McGaughey
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #15 · p.49 #15 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


jjf88 wrote:
X pro 1 with the 35mm 1.4 shot raw...ACR processed with 10 points of clarity added


Wow. The X-Trans smearing/watercolor effect is horrific in the license plate!



Feb 15, 2013 at 11:06 PM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #16 · p.49 #16 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


I am not sure how you conclude that with such a low-res sample? Presumably any number of factors could be to blame, including the down-sizing technique, and anyway, I am not sure that I see any smearing there.


Feb 15, 2013 at 11:08 PM
Jochenb
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #17 · p.49 #17 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Dave McGaughey wrote:
Wow. The X-Trans smearing/watercolor effect is horrific in the license plate!


You can't see it at these sizes. What you're referring to is just the result of downsizing/sharpening.



Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26 PM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #18 · p.49 #18 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Jochenb wrote:
You can't see it at these sizes. What you're referring to is just the result of downsizing/sharpening.


i thought he was just making a joke about the licens number being edited out?



Feb 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #19 · p.49 #19 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Doh! You are right of course, I completely missed that


Feb 16, 2013 at 12:38 AM
Dave McGaughey
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.49 #20 · p.49 #20 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


sebboh wrote:
i thought he was just making a joke about the licens number being edited out?


Thought it was obvious enough I didn't have to add a smiley face!



Feb 16, 2013 at 01:13 AM
1       2       3              48      
49
       50              577       578       end






FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              48      
49
       50              577       578       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password