Upload & Sell: Off
| p.1 #1 · Canon 180mm macro vs. 70-200 f/2.8 IS II at 180mm for landscape |
Any opinions about relative image quality would be of interest. I ask because I am trying to fill a niche for telephoto landscape use, ergo f/8 or smaller for depth of field, and quite a bit of hyperfocal use. I make enlargements 40 to 50 inches wide, so image quality is always stressed, in both senses of the word. After some experiments with the zoom, I'm less inclined to think it can get over the bar than I was when I started. Seems like 2 copies of the zoom I have tried have both had trouble with uniform sharpness across the field. Either one would probably work okay as an event shooter, but I may be demanding too much.