p.1 #1 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
Okay, it is an oximoron since I just put good $$ on the 400 2.8 and worried about a tripod breaking my bank. But I would love suggestions on what is a good-steardy and not to expensive Tripod. I do have a monopod for the lens, but while I traveled to pick up the lense, i saw opportunities to shoot but monopod would not help much. Low SS would be required. Thank you all for your inputs
p.1 #2 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
well whats in the bank? you dropped a few grand on the glass whats it worth to you to hold it up properly now? don't forget in addition to the legs you gotta get a head.
p.1 #3 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
sjms, thanks for the input. I want all the information you all can give and go from there. I am new to this type of Glass and don't want an OOOPPPSSSS on it, so come to the BEST place for advice
p.1 #4 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
well here's what i use with my own 300/2.8 and any large lenses i use up to 500
(1) RRS TVC-33 legset
(1) RRS BH-55 ballhead
(1) Wimberley Sidekick
(1) appropriate arca swiss type adapter plate or replacement foot for attachment
(1) optional leveling base for tripod head http://i.pbase.com/o2/89/44489/1/120334885.kjWHdnAy._DS32033.jpg
now there are various other equipment makers out there with varying pricing. this is the tippy top of the heap.
gitzo
induro
kirk
markins
others too.
you do get what you pay for in the long run
p.1 #7 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
To save money, look for an older used Gitzo aluminum tripod. Yes they are heavier than the state of the art carbon fiber ones but they are also about 1/3 the cost. I have a 1410 with a full Wimberley version I. I bought them both new several years ago and I've never looked back.
p.1 #8 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
You could consider Gitzo aluminum (like the series 4 that DGC1 has recommended), the big Feisols, or a Berlebach wooden tripod, all of which are good quality alternatives to RRS or Gitzo carbon fiber legs. The Dutch Hill legs look interesting, too. All are very decent, but if you find yourself craving a premium setup in six months, they'll end up costing you more than if you just buy right the first time.
p.1 #10 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
I think the Feisol carbon fiber tripods give you the best bang for the buck and they have a 3-year international warranty, and I would think that any model from 22 lbs up (max load/capacity) should work:
I have only used a Feisol briefly a long time ago (didn't have any problem with it but decided to go with Gitzo) and have not used another one since .... although I did order their CT-3401 as I need a lightweight tripod for travel.
p.1 #11 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
I like Feisol a lot, too, but I would add a caveat: some of those rated at 22 pounds are the 3441/34412 variants, which have 28mm lengs (Gitzo series 2). That's not going to cut it with a 400/2.8.
The bigger models (3371/3471/etc.) are a much better choice. I believe SJMS used one before he switched to RRS for his long lens setup.
p.1 #13 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
I use the following to support my 500 f/4 IS and a gripped 7D:
Gitzo 3531
Induro BHD 3
Wimberley Sidekick
Wimberley P50
The ballhead is rated for 55lbs and is very smooth with the Sidekick and the 500. The above will cost around $1300 plus taxes/shipping from B&H and will support your 400 f/2.8 quite nicely. Other ballheads will be more expensive such as Kirk, Arca Swiss and RRS and are all highly recommended. Plan on spending at least this much and I would also recommend a leveling tripod base given the weight of your 400mm. Add and extra $175+ for the base.
p.1 #15 · Tripod for 400 2.8 but won't break the bank
I purchased a new 300 2.8 VR11 and the first time I tried to mount it onto my sidekick I dropped it onto a wooden floor. Lucky it bounced without any damage. I think it bounced off the lens hood.
I put it in the cupboard untill I upgraded my support gear. Full Gimberly on one of the new Manfrotto 507 tripods with 39mm CF legs (I don't like twistlocks).
