Just curious to know how many use 85 1.2 (either I or II) primarily as a manual focus vs auto focus lens. I am planning to get 85 1.2 I over ver II and use manual focusing to compensate for hit or miss shots.
When i had this lens i used it mostly in the MF mode.On version one it is focus by wire so has a little different feel to it than using MF in other lenses.Once you get used to it, its actually not bad as a MF lens.
-Jim
I have just bought version 2. Not sure I would buy either if I intended on MF all the time to be honest. I also have a Samyang 851/4 which I use when I feel like using MF. Has a nice feel to it and will save you some serious cash. IQ is very good too.
Jim Schemel wrote:
When i had this lens i used it mostly in the MF mode.On version one it is focus by wire so has a little different feel to it than using MF in other lenses.Once you get used to it, its actually not bad as a MF lens.
-Jim
I really hate the focus-by-wire MF ring on the 85L II. I can't get it to make the very precise adjustments needed when shooting at 1.2. But since the AF is very precise, I have no need for MF. So, all is good
Unless you use Liveview, you will be better off using its AF feature. If you are not getting sharp images on your target, either your gear is not calibrated to specs (including microfocus adjustment) or your technique is the cause. Sorry for being blunt but seriously, why use MF on an AF setup? In MF cameras of yesteryear, there are focusing helps, such as microprisms or split image prisms. Current AF cameras make it tough for you to do MF or to do well with MF on a consistent basis....
I bought a 5D this week, my entry in FF world. Feeling a bit apprehensive with 5D focus + 85 1.2...double whammy on autofocus! Probably you are right...If I need to use manual focus most of the time, I can save some cash and get either 85 1.8 / Samyang / Sigma...
With the 5D, you cannot do any microfocus adjustment yourself that you can do with the 5D Mark II. I am not sure which one you get. Either way, you need to make sure that the AF tolerances of both, individually and to each other are there. Then you can evaluate the AF performance of both using the center and also try the outer AF points. Under good lighting conditions, the outer AF points are not that bad. Pay attention to, look and use contrasty targets. I may sound like a broken record but you have to give any of the AF point a try until you know how low the lighting conditions can go before you resort to the center AF point only. Have fun!
Not to critique someone else's desires, but the 85 1.2 is not a lens I'd buy for MF. It's a very, very, shallow DoF and most view finders are going to be difficult to MF through with that narror of a DoF.
Hell, I can try to MF with an f/4 lens and miss about 90% of the time.
I'd not spend the money on a 85 1.2 mk1 or mk2 to use as an MF lens. I'd buy a third party lens, and anyone on here knows how much I dislike MF and third party crap.
I wouldn't own my 85L (mkII, FWIW) if I were using it primarily as a MF lens; I'd save some money and get the Zeiss (or a bunch of money and get the Rokinon).
If you're shooting people at 1.2, if they breathe practically between the time you establish focus and hit the trigger, they move out of focus. So you have to work fast. Seems like manual focusing would take so much time you'd keeping losing focus and your subject if it's alive would get put off.
Breitling65 wrote:
AF is very accurate on both of my copies.
Same here. Indeed, all the ones I have used focus well in what for other lenses would be equivalent to total darkness. The 85L suffers to some extent from the focus shift gremlins which the 50L is more notorious for, but under regular shooting conditions every copy I have ever used is spot-ON focuser.
