I am not that keen on Canon products. I shoot the "other" brand, however, my cousin asked my advice on a lens for her daughter for Christmas. I asked her questions about what do you think she wants to do, but received a general answer. With that said, she indicated she wanted to spend $400 or less on lens. She currently has the 18-55mm kit lens only.
Question is, what is a good walk around lens for Canon? Maybe a 35 or 50mm 1.8 prime or something around that area. Or if a nice longer tele that is around the price point. Something with better IQ than the kit lens that also is better in low light situations.
As indicated, there is a budget of $400 (or less).
Does "her daughter" understand all the reasons and benefits of upgrading? Aperture, shutter speeds, ISO, lighting, composition and they way they all relate? If "her daughter" is shooting in green mode and is happy that way, don't suggest any gear. Is she interested in photography for the sake of creating images or just taking snapshots? There's a huge difference. If she does, understand all that and has a decent knowledge of Manual, AV and TV modes, then maybe a fixed focal length would be a very nice addition, and the Canon 35 f/2 or Sigma 30 f/1.4 might be great considerations for her.
tarheelmatt wrote:
I am not that keen on Canon products. I shoot the "other" brand, however, my cousin asked my advice on a lens for her daughter for Christmas. I asked her questions about what do you think she wants to do, but received a general answer. With that said, she indicated she wanted to spend $400 or less on lens.
I think a good starting point would be to take a look at what you would suggest to her if she had that "other" brand. If you can answer this, then maybe there is a Canon equivalent and probably for less money.
tarheelmatt wrote:
Question is, what is a good walk around lens for Canon? Maybe a 35 or 50mm 1.8 prime or something around that area. Or if a nice longer tele that is around the price point. Something with better IQ than the kit lens that also is better in low light situations.
In regards to these choices, especially if you can stretch the budget:
Canon 50f1.4 (although 50mm is quite long on a crop DSLR)
Tamron 17-50f2.8 non-IS around $500
Canon 70-200f4 used for around $500
Yes, I do think she has an understanding of upgrading and apparently has addressed this with her mother. Her daughter is away at school and so I have not spoke with the daughter. However, I have witnessed her pictures that include a mixture of snapshots and creating her own work. She is a sophomore in college, so the snapshots can be justified (lol). From what was portrayed to me she was looking for a good walk around lens. To me a walk around lens mean something that can handle low light well and includes good IQ.
Thank you for your suggestions. I have been looking at B&H and Adorama and have read many reviews till my head is spinning. Thought I would ask here to get some feedback.
surf monkey wrote:
In regards to these choices, especially if you can stretch the budget:
Canon 50f1.4 (although 50mm is quite long on a crop DSLR)
Tamron 17-50f2.8 non-IS around $500
This. I'll throw Sigma's 30/1.4 into the ring as well.
surf monkey wrote:
I think a good starting point would be to take a look at what you would suggest to her if she had that "other" brand. If you can answer this, then maybe there is a Canon equivalent and probably for less money.
Well, that is what I was doing, but I was deeply afraid I would miss out on something that I did not find. I know Nikon lenses, and a good walk around for me is a 35 1.8 or the 50 1.4. However, some of the third party lenses are as good if not better. Just making sure I don't over see something that is all.
