It is exactly 4 weeks to the day I bought a Mk-II here on FM, but was mortified to use it without a UV filter I do know that filters are over-rated and all that but still...) Finally my filters arrived today (another purchase here on FM) and here is one SOOC. I am going to love this
Four weeks with this lens and this is all you can show for it? You gotta get out more, dude!
sritri wrote:
It is exactly 4 weeks to the day I bought a Mk-II here on FM, but was mortified to use it without a UV filter I do know that filters are over-rated and all that but still...) Finally my filters arrived today (another purchase here on FM) and here is one SOOC. I am going to love this
sritri wrote:
It is exactly 4 weeks to the day I bought a Mk-II here on FM, but was mortified to use it without a UV filter I do know that filters are over-rated and all that but still...) Finally my filters arrived today (another purchase here on FM) and here is one SOOC. I am going to love this
reno.peterson wrote:
A little more than a week or so in, and I again got to take this beauty out!!! A bit of user error, but overall when I get it...It get's it!!!
Ah ha has the pijun king seen this? Now we have some competition
Great shots here everyone!!! Wish Ihad the opportunities Michael & Joshua do with the masked shots...Oh well...I'll take what I can get. These were taken with my beat up 2x II on the 70-200L IS II ...
I dont know why but I keep dipping into this thread . I then have to go off into the corner and chant "I love my MDP"
I think I'll have to glue my eyes shut or my wallet is going to get a hit
For those of you who have used the 70-200/2.8 IS and the MKII extensively in low light/low contrast conditions how would you rate the AF accuracy between the two? I've had issues with my 70-200/2.8 IS when used in low light at a distance where the focus light of a 580EXII wouldn't reach the target. The lens would literally hunt and stall. From what I've heard/read so far the MKII seems improved in this area, but some more feedback never hurts.