I guess fascination with cars exists everywhere, right Buddy. You did a more than credible job with your borrowed camera. I've been so inconsistent in my participation on the thread that I either didn't know or forgot you were without a camera. That definitely puts a crimp in your photography! Hope you're able to find a way Buddy. Your presence on the thread has always been valued. Thanks for these...
Lieutenant Z wrote:
Mihai, the 20/2.8 ais is actually the only one Nikon lens I currently use, that's why you see as (too) much pics taken with that glass in that thread... In fact I mainly shoot with the excellent Sony Zeiss 55/1.8 but obviously I can't post those images here. Truth be told, the 20/2.8 ais is quite a mediocre lens and I keep using it solely to be able to post on this thread. I feel rather tempted to get the future 21mm Voigtlander Skopar FE (or the Zony 16-35) : we'll see what happens. But yes, I love shooting street with UWA : that's demanding but also rewarding when things work well....Show more →
While not as wide as the 20 or 24 the 28 2.8 (non ai but butchered by me) that I have which is really a beater is a marvellous little lens. The ais is slated to be one of the best that Nikon ever made. On FX it should perform well for you. And they're dirt cheap too.
I do but I don't use it often enough; have never been used to reaching out for a long lens.
I like the built-in hood and oof areas have a nice smooth render. Though that might be characteristic of its focal length. Not much to complain about to be honest, it's light-ish and compact-ish. Not a 'wow' lens for me, more like a workhorse type. I'll have to dig around for shots done with it.
Laura glad you are on the mend, Get well and get home!
Samy there are cycles in storms and weather and wondering if the long term view of Ellicot is something being considered. I can imagine developers sdalivating over the prime locations with steel and glass time share condos in mind!
Curtis welcome back. Not mentioning in the same breath photographic wise but a please come back to GeorgeMS and Ben.
Leighton I like the 75mm perspective and the crop does well for the corners.
Buddy you reminded me that I have a few car shots not posted and in my queue … so here they are!
I've never warmed up to using 35mm lenses
Tried again on this outing - the 24/2 mounted on the X-T20
Just can't get used to it. Like Peter mentioned a couple of posts above, the 28/2.8 is a firm favorite of mine too
I'm a big fan of the 28mm lenses as well. 35mm simply never struck my fancy. I eventually bought the 35 f/1.4 AI-s that at the time was being touted by Gregory, Nikkor AIS who was definitely a character. But it never warmed my heart. I later bought the 35 f/2 O AI as part of m pre-AI adventure. Again, I was more drawn to 28mm.
That said, I was always a fan of Philippe's work with the 20 f2.8 AI-s. He may no longer be a big fan of the lens as he tastes other manufacturer's lenses, but even at the beginning of his time on this thread he was using the lens in very distinctive ways. I'm glad you've kept the lens Philippe, if only because it permits you to drop in here from time to time to share your more recent street work, which is very distinctive and evocative.
swainsons wrote:
Anyone got experience with 135f2.8Ai-S??
Imagine that... two consecutive posts from South Africa. Glad you stopped by.
I own the 135 f/2.8 AI which has the same form and same optical design as the AI-s. AI lenses tend to have a longer focus throw, which is appealing for folks who use the lens with extension tubes for doing close work. The shorter focus throw is better for other kinds of shooting.
In terms of performance it does a nice job. Here's a photo I took in the Netherlands a few years ago with that lens mounted on a D700.
That said, as mentioned above by Chin, it is not a focal length that gets a great deal of use. I'm either using one of the many 105mm lenses or if I want to go long, the 180 f/2.8 AI-s. I also find the size of the lens not ideal for longer shooting. It is a relatively small, light lens. When shooting long I appreciate a bit more mass and weight. For that reason, I'm inclined to use an earlier lens like a converter pre-AI Q.C. or the pre-AI K. Both of those lenses are larger and heavier. Here you can see the difference.
Left to right: 135 f/2 AI-s, 135 f/2.8 AI, 135 f/2.8 K AI, 135 f/2.8 Q.C. AI
Nikon has made wonderful lenses so you'd do fine with the AI-s, but there are other options to consider depending on your needs. The f/2 is very big, a real handful. It also costs a premium. The K and Q.C. can be difficult to find with the AI conversion, if you're shooting with a camera that requires that. If not, they will be the least expensive option, which can be sweet because they are both excellent performers. Here is a comparison I did a number of years ago.
Philippe better hang on to that 20 so we can see his posts here. He has done wonders with a simple 50 1.8 if I remember, its him, not the lenses
Ken, fantastic Noct colour on those vintage cars!!!!
Chin, superb work with the 24, you had something similar a page or two ago.
Ken, the developers will have to hold their salivating for a bit. As I understand over-development in the valley has contributed to the ferocity of the floods, and I believe there maybe a moratorium on development after the latest flood in May. We can't hide, or run, from the damage we are doing. At least with my wobbly knees I can not
CGrindahl wrote:
I'm a big fan of the 28mm lenses as well. 35mm simply never struck my fancy. I eventually bought the 35 f/1.4 AI-s that at the time was being touted by Gregory, Nikkor AIS who was definitely a character. But it never warmed my heart. I later bought the 35 f/2 O AI as part of m pre-AI adventure. Again, I was more drawn to 28mm.
That said, I was always a fan of Philippe's work with the 20 f2.8 AI-s. He may no longer be a big fan of the lens as he tastes other manufacturer's lenses, but even at the beginning of his time on this thread he was using the lens in very distinctive ways. I'm glad you've kept the lens Philippe, if only because it permits you to drop in here from time to time to share your more recent street work, which is very distinctive and evocative....Show more →
Philippe also started with a D90 shooting at ground level quite a bit
I asked him once why he didn't do that anymore and said age had caught up to him
Thank goodness for tilt screens now
Reagan wrote:
Philippe also started with a D90 shooting at ground level quite a bit
I asked him once why he didn't do that anymore and said age had caught up to him
Thank goodness for tilt screens now
Reagan
That's what I was remembering too Reagan. I'd forgotten about the D90, and, you're right, of course, the newer cameras are offering the tilted screen which gives us so much flexibility. That in itself might motivate me toward the Z6 or possibly even the Z7. I'm not nearly as agile as I once was. I may be able to hike 6 and a half miles as I did yesterday, but finding a place to take a break and then get up again is never easy. I found a few rocks and large fallen trees, but the last thing I was going to do was sit on the ground...
CGrindahl wrote:
I'm a big fan of the 28mm lenses as well. 35mm simply never struck my fancy. I eventually bought the 35 f/1.4 AI-s that at the time was being touted by Gregory, Nikkor AIS who was definitely a character. But it never warmed my heart. I later bought the 35 f/2 O AI as part of m pre-AI adventure. Again, I was more drawn to 28mm.
That said, I was always a fan of Philippe's work with the 20 f2.8 AI-s. He may no longer be a big fan of the lens as he tastes other manufacturer's lenses, but even at the beginning of his time on this thread he was using the lens in very distinctive ways. I'm glad you've kept the lens Philippe, if only because it permits you to drop in here from time to time to share your more recent street work, which is very distinctive and evocative....Show more →
Curtis, I was actually using the 28/2.8 ais since the beginning of my participation until very recently (it was my first Nikon MF with the 180/2.8 and I still own both of them). In fact I got the 20/2.8 less than a year ago.
Corners are weak using the 20/2.8 mounted on the Sony mirrorless. Don't konw for the 28, I'll give it a try.
saph wrote:
Uh oh the pusher at it again on the thread. Now for the life of me I can't remember who called Curtis that a few years ago. But someone did.
Wait a minute here Sami. I don't push lenses my friend, I educate folks so they can make the most informed decision. I'm a teacher...
Of course, my appreciation for these lenses probably comes through. But trust me, especially having witnessed the repeated abandonment of these lenses by folks on this thread I'm at peace with the reality my affection is not shared by everyone. That doesn't diminish my own enthusiasm and frankly, it allows me to relax with the decisions others make. Whatever floats your boat is fine by me. Life's too short to waste it trying to control anyone else...
CGrindahl wrote:
That's what I was remembering too Reagan. I'd forgotten about the D90, and, you're right, of course, the newer cameras are offering the tilted screen which gives us so much flexibility. That in itself might motivate me toward the Z6 or possibly even the Z7. I'm not nearly as agile as I once was. I may be able to hike 6 and a half miles as I did yesterday, but finding a place to take a break and then get up again is never easy. I found a few rocks and large fallen trees, but the last thing I was going to do was sit on the ground...
Lieutenant Z wrote:
Curtis, I was actually using the 28/2.8 ais since the beginning of my participation until very recently (it was my first Nikon MF with the 180/2.8 and I still own both of them). In fact I got the 20/2.8 less than a year ago.
Corners are weak using the 20/2.8 mounted on the Sony mirrorless. Don't konw for the 28, I'll give it a try.
Thanks for the correction Philippe. My memory is like a steel trap at times, but often if feels more like a sieve... I think is much like the rest of my body that doesn't work quite as well now as it did in my youth. That is perhaps why my old boss had a placard behind his desk that said "old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill..." We need something to give us a bit of advantage as our bodies lose their vibrancy.
Again, glad you've stuck with us Philippe. I love seeing the development of your photography and seeing the world you inhabit. Thanks for that.
leighton w wrote:
I think his name was Andy, but don't quote me on that.
Definitely Andy. He was a wonderful participant for a short while, posing delightful images taken with the NOCT and a number of other lenses then not in use on the thread, for example the 25-50 f/4 AI-s. His work motivated me to pick up a copy of that lens.
And yes, he posted drool worthy photos of his kit. He did seem to own one of everything. Try this on for size.
He did the same for his kit of lenses, showing EVERY 80/70-200 lens produced. He was a pleasure to talk with.
CGrindahl wrote:
Thanks for the correction Philippe. My memory is like a steel trap at times, but often if feels more like a sieve... I think is much like the rest of my body that doesn't work quite as well now as it did in my youth. That is perhaps why my old boss had a placard behind his desk that said "old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill..." We need something to give us a bit of advantage as our bodies lose their vibrancy.
Again, glad you've stuck with us Philippe. I love seeing the development of your photography and seeing the world you inhabit. Thanks for that.
Haha, you know what Jean-Jacques Rousseau said : "Youth is the time to study wisdom, age the time to practise it".
My Grandma, on her part and in her great wisdom used to say something like : "youth is a disease that can be cured very quickly..."
