saph wrote:
I have never had the 3.5cm f1.8. I like the looks of that lens, but somehow have never taken the plunge. I have the f/2.5 and f/3.5 versions.
The f2.5 and f3.5 but not the f1,8? That's a correctable situation, and I nominate you to correct it asap. Maybe it doesn't just look good, but it is good.
A three-day hike in the mountains at altitudes ranging from 1,500 to 2,600 meters, featuring remarkable scenery and excellent evening meals at local homes.
The 2,500-meter elevation gain dictated the choice of lightweight gear: Sony A7II and Nikon AF 28-70/3.5-4.5 and Nikon E 75-150/3.5 zoom lenses.
Curiously, even though I used both lenses more or less equally, I chose to keep the photos taken with the telephoto lens.
lumenspixel wrote:
Northern Lebanon | Nikon E 75-150/3,5
A three-day hike in the mountains at altitudes ranging from 1,500 to 2,600 meters, featuring remarkable scenery and excellent evening meals at local homes.
lumenspixel wrote:
Northern Lebanon | Nikon E 75-150/3,5
A three-day hike in the mountains at altitudes ranging from 1,500 to 2,600 meters, featuring remarkable scenery and excellent evening meals at local homes.
The 2,500-meter elevation gain dictated the choice of lightweight gear: Sony A7II and Nikon AF 28-70/3.5-4.5 and Nikon E 75-150/3.5 zoom lenses.
Curiously, even though I used both lenses more or less equally, I chose to keep the photos taken with the telephoto lens.
What a great set Michel! Even more curious - that forth tree shot cost me $40 - as I finally broke down and got a late model 75-150mm series E. So many times there have been good photos on this forum using that lens. I suspect, however, that this will be like a trip to the barber - "make me look like that guy on the wall" I know it's not the lens - it's the person behind it.
The 75-150 is my favorite of the Series E line, followed closely by the 50 and 100. Zoom creep was its only fault, the electrical tape fix was only a so-so work around for it. The real fix is to replace the internal felt, but I couldn’t find someone to replace it for anything less than twice the lens value.
James Markus wrote:
What a great set Michel! Even more curious - that forth tree shot cost me $40 - as I finally broke down and got a late model 75-150mm series E. So many times there have been good photos on this forum using that lens. I suspect, however, that this will be like a trip to the barber - "make me look like that guy on the wall" I know it's not the lens - it's the person behind it.
