Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
p.66 #1Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Willy Y. wrote:
Just a couple from this weekend.
No idea why you would use such a low shutter speed, unless you like that blurred result.
Just a couple from this weekend.
No idea why you would use such a low shutter speed, unless you like that blurred result.
Nov 06, 2020 at 02:13 PM
p.66 #3Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Imagemaster wrote:
No idea why you would use such a low shutter speed, unless you like that blurred result.
Imagemaster wrote:
No idea why you would use such a low shutter speed, unless you like that blurred result.
I admit I’m not a bird photographer but I have shot a lot of sports, and generally motion blur is a desirable effect when the subject is in focus. You remind me of Trenchmonkey over on the Nikon forum, real good at bird photography and kind of confrontational if it is anything you don’t agree with or like. Are my photos threatening you because you only know how to dial in 1/3000 of a second?
I do know how to use a camera, I have been doing it since film, and early DSLR cameras like the canon 20d.
Willy Y. wrote
Just a couple from this weekend.Imagemaster wrote:
Willy Y. wrote
Just a couple from this weekend.I admit I’m not a bird photographer but I have shot a lot of sports, and generally motion blur is a desirable effect when the subject is in focus. You remind me of Trenchmonkey over on the Nikon forum, real good at bird photography and kind of confrontational if it is anything you don’t agree with or like. Are my photos threatening you because you only know how to dial in 1/3000 of a second?
I do know how to use a camera, I have been doing it since film, and early DSLR cameras like the canon 20d.
Nov 06, 2020 at 02:41 PM
p.66 #5Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Willy Y. wrote:
No idea why you would use such a low shutter speed, unless you like that blurred result.I admit I’m not a bird photographer but I have shot a lot of sports, and generally motion blur is a desirable effect when the subject is in focus. You remind me of Trenchmonkey over on the Nikon forum, real good at bird photography and kind of confrontational if it is anything you don’t agree with or like. Are my photos threatening you because you only know how to dial in 1/3000 of a second?
I do know how to use a camera, I have been doing it since film, and early DSLR cameras like the canon 20d.
Geez, what is confrontational about one saying they don't like something? Do you want everyone to say they like everything they look at?
So you you like some motion blur, and I don't. My, my. If I want to see sports motion, I will watch video. When I see a ball or player in mid-air my little brain knows it was in motion. I don't need any blur to figure that out. Some like it and some don't. If you have a problem with that, too bad.
Why don't your 20D eagle shots have any motion blur?
I don't need YOUR confrontational attitude, so your posts are now hidden. You are too big a threat to me.
Imagemaster wrote
Willy Y. wrote
Just a couple from this weekend.I do know how to use a camera, I have been doing it since film, and early DSLR cameras like the canon 20d.
Geez, what is confrontational about one saying they don't like something? Do you want everyone to say they like everything they look at?
So you you like some motion blur, and I don't. My, my. If I want to see sports motion, I will watch video. When I see a ball or player in mid-air my little brain knows it was in motion. I don't need any blur to figure that out. Some like it and some don't. If you have a problem with that, too bad.
Why don't your 20D eagle shots have any motion blur?
I don't need YOUR confrontational attitude, so your posts are now hidden. You are too big a threat to me.
Nov 08, 2020 at 09:02 PM
p.66 #6Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
20D. Sorry about any wing blur. I wasn't using 1/3000 sec. 
Nov 08, 2020 at 10:19 PM
p.66 #7Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Imagemaster wrote:
Why don't your 20D eagle shots have any motion blur?
Well... That’s obvious 😃
Nov 08, 2020 at 11:26 PM
p.66 #8Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Willy Y. wrote:
I admit I’m not a bird photographer but I have shot a lot of sports, and generally motion blur is a desirable effect when the subject is in focus. You remind me of Trenchmonkey over on the Nikon forum, real good at bird photography and kind of confrontational if it is anything you don’t agree with or like. Are my photos threatening you because you only know how to dial in 1/3000 of a second?
I do know how to use a camera, I have been doing it since film, and early DSLR cameras like the canon 20d.
Do not worry: this is not a photography forum where people look at pictures. This a place where they show they can shoot the BIF over & over with no attempt at doing anything anything else than focusing, exposing and framing so that the image is sharp.
And there are endless bitter discussions about which gear is best to get said sharp images. So when you talk to the kind of person who used Olympus, trashed it for a long time, said Sony was better, finally switched to Sony, continued to trash Olympus and finally switched back, what do you expect?
FM is a good forum but the Micro Four Thirds section is a joke.
I admit I’m not a bird photographer but I have shot a lot of sports, and generally motion blur is a desirable effect when the subject is in focus. You remind me of Trenchmonkey over on the Nikon forum, real good at bird photography and kind of confrontational if it is anything you don’t agree with or like. Are my photos threatening you because you only know how to dial in 1/3000 of a second?
I do know how to use a camera, I have been doing it since film, and early DSLR cameras like the canon 20d.
Do not worry: this is not a photography forum where people look at pictures. This a place where they show they can shoot the BIF over & over with no attempt at doing anything anything else than focusing, exposing and framing so that the image is sharp.
And there are endless bitter discussions about which gear is best to get said sharp images. So when you talk to the kind of person who used Olympus, trashed it for a long time, said Sony was better, finally switched to Sony, continued to trash Olympus and finally switched back, what do you expect?
FM is a good forum but the Micro Four Thirds section is a joke.
Nov 09, 2020 at 12:36 AM
p.66 #9Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Willy Y. wrote:
You remind me of Trenchmonkey over on the Nikon forum, real good at bird photography and kind of confrontational if it is anything you don’t agree with or like.
Hmmm... same initials, too!
You remind me of Trenchmonkey over on the Nikon forum, real good at bird photography and kind of confrontational if it is anything you don’t agree with or like.
Hmmm... same initials, too!
Nov 09, 2020 at 11:18 AM
p.66 #10Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Imagemaster wrote:
20D. Sorry about any wing blur. I wasn't using 1/3000 sec.
Don't be.. those are the most exciting shots I have seen from you, and way back with an 8.2 megapixel camera.
20D. Sorry about any wing blur. I wasn't using 1/3000 sec.
Don't be.. those are the most exciting shots I have seen from you, and way back with an 8.2 megapixel camera.
Nov 09, 2020 at 06:54 PM
|
p.66 #12Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
This is the story of how we spent way too much time around Vik, and missed seeing Diamond Beach before sunset.
Pen-F / 12-32 / 12-35 2.8 / 25 1.4 / 45-150
Pen-F / 12-32 / 12-35 2.8 / 25 1.4 / 45-150
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Nov 09, 2020 at 11:39 PM
p.66 #14Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
EM1M2 with Panasonic 100-300
PB110249.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on Flickr
PB110022.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on Flickr
PB110030.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on Flickr
PB110044.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on Flickr
PB110439.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on Flickr
PB110383.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on Flickr
PB110249.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on FlickrPB110022.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on FlickrPB110030.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on FlickrPB110044.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on FlickrPB110439.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on FlickrPB110383.jpg by Dmitry Brodsky, on FlickrNov 11, 2020 at 02:51 PM
p.66 #15Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
How’s the workout coming along 😊
Also I just picked up my S5 yesterday and the weight and size is night and day different. Albeit you have to accept the EVF being nowhere close to that of the S1/S1R.
Wilbus wrote:
ps: I doubt you'll sell your M43 - I have both formats and they work well together as the S1R after sometime can get pretty heavy in hand.I does indeed seem like a great camera but I can see why you are selling if you don't crop or print. I have my Canon Prograf 1000 printer which I intend to use more and more and the S1R doesn't only give higher pixel count but also the ability to crop more, which I find my self doing more and more in order to experiment and learn (so I can get it right in the future in camera).
The Sigma 85mm DG DN looks superb, and its rendering looks quite similar to the PL 42,5mm I must say, from...Show more →
Also I just picked up my S5 yesterday and the weight and size is night and day different. Albeit you have to accept the EVF being nowhere close to that of the S1/S1R.
Wilbus wrote:
robert_in_ca wrote
Funny that you mention the S1R - I am actually selling mine as I don't do much of any cropping let alone printing. It's a great camera and I love the build quality. To get something close to your 42.5 F1.2 that's affordable, you'll have to go with the new Sigma 85mm DG DN lens as Panasonic hasn't released their 85mm which will only be a F1.8. There isn't a S Pro version currently on their roadmap.ps: I doubt you'll sell your M43 - I have both formats and they work well together as the S1R after sometime can get pretty heavy in hand.
The Sigma 85mm DG DN looks superb, and its rendering looks quite similar to the PL 42,5mm I must say, from...Show more →
Nov 15, 2020 at 09:15 AM
p.66 #17Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Great mix of "birds" Tony; thanks for sharing...
Regards,
Edd
Regards,
Edd
Nov 16, 2020 at 06:09 PM
p.66 #18Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
I think this is an immature Cooper's and it was playing with the cone as if it was practising with a bird.
Nov 19, 2020 at 11:54 PM
p.66 #19Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
You certainly are making that 100-400 sing (with or without teleconverters)
Nov 20, 2020 at 09:51 AM
p.66 #20Micro Four-Thirds Image Thread
Tony what a cool experience to watch this! I agree on the immature Cooper as the eye is not orange color yet. NICE!
Nov 20, 2020 at 10:06 AM