lifeandmylens wrote:
A few with my new to me 1954 50 Summarit f/1.5
I actually think $350 was a deal for this lens. Are you sure you want to get it CLA-d? I’d use it for a while longer as it is for the look it is giving, and have a ‘normal’ 50 for those other shots.
Desmolicious wrote:
I actually think $350 was a deal for this lens. Are you sure you want to get it CLA-d? I’d use it for a while longer as it is for the look it is giving, and have a ‘normal’ 50 for those other shots.
Thanks, you're right. I was just thinking last night that maybe I shouldn't CLA it. My wife doesn't care too much about lenses and never comments about them but it's the first time she said that she like this lens and "it feels like a real photograph".
I just sent off my rigid for CLA, so that'll be my normal 50 and I'll keep this one as is for now.
Desmolicious wrote:
what happened to the sky in the 3rd and 4th pics? There are some gnarly scanning stripes.
I used Lightroom to crank the visibility of the sky up (used the 4k resolution TIFF file from my lab) and those came out. I’m amazed there was any sky detail at all because the jpeg files looked pretty blown out.
