Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
p.1785 #4Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Leica M6 and Ilford FP4+ 125 film, developed in Xtol (1:2)
Leitz 50/1.5 Summitar LTM with ND filter @ f/1.5
Leitz 50/1.5 Summitar LTM with ND filter @ f/1.5
Canon 35/2.8 Serenar LTM @ f/5.6
Canon 35/2.8 Serenar LTM @ f/2.8 with ND filter
[/img
Canon 35/2.8 Serenar LTM @ f/8.0
[/imgMar 20, 2021 at 01:05 PM
p.1785 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
retrofocus wrote:
Leica M6 and Ilford FP4+ 125 film, developed in Xtol (1:2)
Do tell...what is the first image? Wait, I like it the way it is very much. Maybe better not to know
Leica M6 and Ilford FP4+ 125 film, developed in Xtol (1:2)
Do tell...what is the first image? Wait, I like it the way it is very much. Maybe better not to know
Mar 20, 2021 at 01:10 PM
p.1785 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
LBJ2 wrote:
Do tell...what is the first image? Wait, I like it the way it is very much. Maybe better not to know
. It is the front part of a canoe on a boat rack.
retrofocus wrote
Leica M6 and Ilford FP4+ 125 film, developed in Xtol (1:2). It is the front part of a canoe on a boat rack. Mar 20, 2021 at 01:25 PM
|
p.1785 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
retrofocus wrote:
Leica M6 and Ilford FP4+ 125 film, developed in Xtol (1:2)
https://martinbluhm.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p2229519288-6.jpg
Leitz 50/1.5 Summitar LTM with ND filter @ f/1.5
https://martinbluhm.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p2229519285-6.jpg
Leitz 50/1.5 Summitar LTM with ND filter @ f/1.5
https://martinbluhm.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p2229519554-6.jpg
Canon 35/2.8 Serenar LTM @ f/5.6
https://martinbluhm.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p2229519586-5.jpg
Canon 35/2.8 Serenar LTM @ f/2.8 with ND filter
https://martinbluhm.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p2229519746-5.jpg
Canon 35/2.8 Serenar LTM @ f/8.0
Martin, I really like the rendering of the Serenar 35/2.8.
Leica M6 and Ilford FP4+ 125 film, developed in Xtol (1:2)
Martin, I really like the rendering of the Serenar 35/2.8.
Mar 20, 2021 at 11:55 PM
p.1785 #15Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
genji wrote:
Martin, I really like the rendering of the Serenar 35/2.8.
Thanks, it is a very compact but nice looking LTM lens which can still be obtained for a reasonable price online. I call it one of the "hidden gems" out there because there are barely any YouTube videos or reviews about it. I bought my copy > 2 years ago to have a 35 mm lens which fits on my Leica IIIc camera - and I didn't want to spend > $400 for f/2 or f/3.5 alternatives. Wide open, the 35/2.8 Serenar has a very distinct vintage look with some vignetting and unsharp corners but smooth transition towards the background. At f/8 the lens is at its sharpest.
Martin, I really like the rendering of the Serenar 35/2.8.
Thanks, it is a very compact but nice looking LTM lens which can still be obtained for a reasonable price online. I call it one of the "hidden gems" out there because there are barely any YouTube videos or reviews about it. I bought my copy > 2 years ago to have a 35 mm lens which fits on my Leica IIIc camera - and I didn't want to spend > $400 for f/2 or f/3.5 alternatives. Wide open, the 35/2.8 Serenar has a very distinct vintage look with some vignetting and unsharp corners but smooth transition towards the background. At f/8 the lens is at its sharpest.
Mar 21, 2021 at 07:26 AM
p.1785 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
M6 + ZM 35/2.8 C-Biogon + Portra 400
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Mar 21, 2021 at 11:46 AM
