Mitch Alland wrote: zhangyue wrote...35lux pre-ASPH my favorite night leica glass on m10....Michael:
Wonderful work with this lens. Although I suspect it's mainly the huge talent of the photographer that creates the emotion of these images, with some contribution of the properties of this lens. I suppose these are at f/1.4, but what ISO — and, are they underexposed and pushed in post, or just normal exposure and processing?
I have the Summicron 35v4 and the Summilux 35 FLE, but the two last years was looking for the Summilux 35 pre-ASPH. The trouble was that I had my mind set on the M3 version of the lens, the one with goggles that I could use on my M3. In good shape these are very expensive. I ended up ordering a reasonably priced one from South Africa: the lens was fine but there was a problem with the goggles. I ended up sending it back because I was in the States and was in a week leaving for our annual move to France and Thailand for six months, so I felt I couldn't get it fixed until later that year.
Now, I'm thinking of going for the less expensive non-goggle version for two reasons. One is that the goggles are somewhat problematic when shooting in dark scenes and into the light: probably better to use my tiny Voigtlander 28/35 Mini-Finder. (The goggles also make the lens somewhat heavy and unbalanced.)
The other reason is that not only have I come to terms with my M10 but, also, I'm unlikely to shoot film with my M6 and M3 in the foreseeable future, if at all. While I love shooting Tri-X, with our annual migration between Washington, Paris and Bangkok/Chiang Mai, I cannot really process film myself. Briefly, my first return to film was when, in 2012 when, in my only impulse purchase of a camera, I bought a pristine Hasselblad 903SWC with the intention of using the best small, hand development and printing lab in Bangkok. But when I got back to Thailand, I found that the photographer who ran the lab had died in a car accident. Three years ago, I bought an M3 after finding two good labs in in Bangkok and Chiang Mai. Last year the Bangkok lab closed after the owner died of sleep-apnea in his early fifties. This year, when I got back to Chiang Mai three weeks ago, I found that the lab here had closed. The young woman who ran it had been advised by her doctor to stop mass hand development of film after her blood tests had shown some problems: her intensive extent of daily hand development was not like someone developing two or three rolls a week.
It seems to me that it's more reasonable for me to look for the non-goggle version of the Summilux 35 pre-ASPH. Then, there is the question of v1 vs v2, but am I right in thinking that it doesn't matter that much?...Show more →
Hi, Mitch, Thank you for your kind comments. Actually, that day I took images with this and new 28cron and 50APO cron, however, my favorite are from 35lux pre-ASPH. The classic rendering and right amount of SA is just works in this situation. I don't find I use it a lot given I have so many gears around, however, each time I pull this lens out, it give me some memorable shots to remind me how lovely it is.
I would definitely get m3 version, not for using on m3 but mainly for 0.7M focus distance. A very important feature for 35mm lens, especially for family images (at least for me who don't shoot street closely enough) that I can shoot it in close distance. of course, you might find 50mm frame line also interesting and preferred to see out of frame, I do.
Mine is special edition V2 that all black with brass I bought from Japan, it was expensive. It delivered way out of rangefinder focus alignment. I send it off to DAG. He took care of both bug eyes and rangefinder alignment and both need adjust for this lens. Two years later, it manage to drift back focus again and I have to send it to DAG again, he did it for free this time even it is out of warranty. (I just can't rate him higher, a real gentlemen) He told me, it is a difficult lens to adjust.
As for spec, the EXIF should be there. The first one is at ISO2000 but I think I under exposure it at least two stop. The next one is ISO6400. I didn't try to bring back the exposure but keep original scene. A personal preference.
zhangyue wrote:
Genji, congratulation for m9m, hi, should you wait for m10m That one will be killer.
Michael, I agree, the M10M will be killer. The budget appropriation process has already been completed; now I’m waiting for the release announcement. In the mean time, I’m really enjoying the M9M.
Hi all, I just stumbled across something very interesting today over at RFF: a project out of China producing a replica of the 35 Cron v1 (8 element) for $500 US. This appears to be a very near match in build quality and optics, producing extremely similar rendering characteristics based on the available sample images.
I'm posting it here in case anyone might be interested. I have also started a dedicated thread here in the Alt forum.
I put myself down for one in black paint and original single coating. The Cron v1 has long been on my wish list, but the price has discouraged its purchase as a secondary 'character' lens...
I must say that the Nokton 75 is absolutely spectacular on the CL--very sharp with lovely glow wide open. I expect that it would be just as good on a FF body.
ocean2059 wrote:
Death Valley (Leica M9 with 35 Summilux-M ASPH lens)
I just watched Antonioni's 1970 movie Zabriskie Point, much of which was shot in Death Valley. It brought back fond memories of driving through Death Valley on a trip from San Francisco to Las Vegas in 1987. I hope you have some more images to post...
genji wrote: ocean2059 wroteDeath Valley (Leica M9 with 35 Summilux-M ASPH lens)I just watched Antonioni's 1970 movie Zabriskie Point, much of which was shot in Death Valley. It brought back fond memories of driving through Death Valley on a trip from San Francisco to Las Vegas in 1987. I hope you have some more images to post...
I really enjoy driving through the park and am planning to go back again next year to spend more time there. Here is one more taken with Leica M9 with WATE lens.
My daughter's first time really enjoying snow. At this age, she isn't really interested in the camera and it's hard to catch her smile, but she's still cute.