Mitch, I just wanted to say that Frog Leaping looks amazing. In the time where so many single images live on hard drives and say nothing, you have put together an amazing book. Also, to be in the company you mentioned on the signing day is something out of this world. Well done man, well done.
Tobin
Tobin28 wrote:
Mitch, I just wanted to say that Frog Leaping looks amazing. In the time where so many single images live on hard drives and say nothing, you have put together an amazing book. Also, to be in the company you mentioned on the signing day is something out of this world. Well done man, well done.
Tobin
Can anyone comment on the comparison of skin tones with the SL2 and the Q2? I own a Q2 and am very happy with skin tones. I also own the a7r iv and I find that I can't get them to look the way I'd like in post.
I realized that I wanted a Leica I could take with me everywhere without worrying too much about its value (which is sometimes on my mind when I go out with the M10-P and Lux 50 ASPH). My dealer had an original M Monochrom ("M9M") available for a reasonable price and suggested I borrow it for the weekend to see how I liked it. Paired with a ZM 50/2, it turned out to be exactly what I was after—about the same size as my RX1RII plus L-bracket. I never really bonded with the RX1RII so I won't regret selling it to fund the M9M purchase. The files it produces look rather flat and muddy compared to M10-P files converted to monochrome but they contain lots of detailed information. I just have to learn how to post-process them properly.
genji wrote:
I realized that I wanted a Leica I could take with me everywhere without worrying too much about its value (which is sometimes on my mind when I go out with the M10-P and Lux 50 ASPH). My dealer had an original M Monochrom ("M9M") available for a reasonable price and suggested I borrow it for the weekend to see how I liked it. Paired with a ZM 50/2, it turned out to be exactly what I was after—about the same size as my RX1RII plus L-bracket. I never really bonded with the RX1RII so I won't regret selling it to fund the M9M purchase. The files it produces look rather flat and muddy compared to M10-P files converted to monochrome but they contain lots of detailed information. I just have to learn how to post-process them properly. http://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20191201-182145-0117-m9ma-copy01-w1200bc.jpg http://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/flowers-trees/jd-20191201-184459-0147-m9ma-copy01-w1200bc.jpg...Show more →
Congratulations Jonathon for getting the M9M. It works very well with Zeiss ZM lenses, especially the ZM 50/2, 35/2.8, and 85/4. Even the ZM 21/4 is excellent on M9M, which is not usable on other digital M bodies due to its symmetric Biogon design (edge/corner color shift). Enjoy and have fun!