Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
p.1597 #1Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
robgo2 wrote:
Sebboh/Derek,
I'm really glad that you bought an M10, because it means that you will now be participating in the Leica images thread.
Rob
thanks, Rob. I regret to inform you that i did not buy it, i just rented it for a week to calibrate some lenses. much as i like the camera's ergonomics generally, i really dislike rangefinders for the way i shoot and cannot afford such an expensive camera for the few times when a rangefinder won't bother me.
i did rent the 50 lux asph along with it and directly comparing it to my cv 50/1.5 did finally convince me that the difference there is definitely worth it. so i'll be saving for one of those now...
a random family shot with the 35 lux pre-asph wide open:
Sebboh/Derek,
I'm really glad that you bought an M10, because it means that you will now be participating in the Leica images thread.
Rob
thanks, Rob. I regret to inform you that i did not buy it, i just rented it for a week to calibrate some lenses. much as i like the camera's ergonomics generally, i really dislike rangefinders for the way i shoot and cannot afford such an expensive camera for the few times when a rangefinder won't bother me.
i did rent the 50 lux asph along with it and directly comparing it to my cv 50/1.5 did finally convince me that the difference there is definitely worth it. so i'll be saving for one of those now...
a random family shot with the 35 lux pre-asph wide open:
Jun 10, 2018 at 10:45 PM
p.1597 #2Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I had a chance to use a 75 Lux a number of years ago and also found my hit percentage was pretty high. I think it has a fairly long focus throw, which would help. It's still on the wish list, along with the 35 Lux pre-ASPH.
Michael, I ended up holding off on the CV40/1.2 and will wait for their 50/1.2. Difficult to tell much from the limited samples posted from CP+ back a few months ago, other than it might be generally similar to the 40's rendering. The 35/1.7 is kind of boring but I find it stellar for deep focus landscape type shots where lens character isn't really a priority.
A couple variations of what for me is a scene I cannot resist at Tsurugaoka Hachimangu Shinto shrine in Kamakura Japan:
M240 & ZM50/2
Michael, I ended up holding off on the CV40/1.2 and will wait for their 50/1.2. Difficult to tell much from the limited samples posted from CP+ back a few months ago, other than it might be generally similar to the 40's rendering. The 35/1.7 is kind of boring but I find it stellar for deep focus landscape type shots where lens character isn't really a priority.
A couple variations of what for me is a scene I cannot resist at Tsurugaoka Hachimangu Shinto shrine in Kamakura Japan:
M240 & ZM50/2
Jun 10, 2018 at 11:34 PM
p.1597 #4Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I do miss the 35 Summilux Pre-Asph. I think it's just about perfect at f/2.8. I'll likely buy another one in the future! I wish I could use the 50mm Summicron DR on the M10 without having to modify the lens as it can't focus past 10m, but it sure is an enjoyable lens to use on film!
Jun 11, 2018 at 11:48 AM
p.1597 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
sebboh wrote:
I'm really glad that you bought an M10, because it means that you will now be participating in the Leica images thread.
Robthanks, Rob. I regret to inform you that i did not buy it, i just rented it for a week to calibrate some lenses. much as i like the camera's ergonomics generally, i really dislike rangefinders for the way i shoot and cannot afford such an expensive camera for the few times when a rangefinder won't bother me.
i did rent the 50 lux asph along with it and directly comparing it to my cv 50/1.5 did finally convince me that the difference there is definitely worth it. so i'll be saving for one of those now...
a random family shot with...Show more →
Well, then, I guess we won't be seeing you in this thread. Too bad.
I credit you with stirring my interest in older non-ASPH lenses to use on an SL. As a result, I now own a Summicron-R 35 f2 (v2), Summilux-R 50 f1.4 (E60) and Summilux-R 80 f1.4. I really love the look that these lenses deliver. The R 35 has been a revelation for me. It produces exceedingly rich and deep images, and even though it never gets totally sharp in the corners, I prefer it overall to my razor-sharp ZM 35 f1.4. So thanks for opening my eyes to different photographic possibilities.
Rob
robgo2 wrote
Sebboh/Derek,I'm really glad that you bought an M10, because it means that you will now be participating in the Leica images thread.
Rob
i did rent the 50 lux asph along with it and directly comparing it to my cv 50/1.5 did finally convince me that the difference there is definitely worth it. so i'll be saving for one of those now...
a random family shot with...Show more →
Well, then, I guess we won't be seeing you in this thread. Too bad.
I credit you with stirring my interest in older non-ASPH lenses to use on an SL. As a result, I now own a Summicron-R 35 f2 (v2), Summilux-R 50 f1.4 (E60) and Summilux-R 80 f1.4. I really love the look that these lenses deliver. The R 35 has been a revelation for me. It produces exceedingly rich and deep images, and even though it never gets totally sharp in the corners, I prefer it overall to my razor-sharp ZM 35 f1.4. So thanks for opening my eyes to different photographic possibilities.
Rob
Jun 11, 2018 at 02:41 PM
p.1597 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
robgo2 wrote:
I'm really glad that you bought an M10, because it means that you will now be participating in the Leica images thread.
Robthanks, Rob. I regret to inform you that i did not buy it, i just rented it for a week to calibrate some lenses. much as i like the camera's ergonomics generally, i really dislike rangefinders for the way i shoot and cannot afford such an expensive camera for the few times when a rangefinder won't bother me.
i did rent the 50 lux asph along with it and directly comparing it to my cv 50/1.5 did finally convince me that the difference there is definitely worth it. so i'll be saving for one of those now...
a random family shot with the 35 lux pre-asph wide open:
http://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1724/40895071110_691a7c40ea_o.jpgWell, then, I guess we won't be seeing you in this thread. Too bad.
I credit you with stirring my interest in older non-ASPH lenses to use on an SL. As a result, I now own a Summicron-R 35 f2 (v2), Summilux-R 50 f1.4 (E60) and Summilux-R 80 f1.4. I really love the look that these lenses deliver. The R 35 has been a revelation for me. It produces exceedingly rich and deep images, and even though it never gets totally sharp in the corners, I prefer it overall to my razor-sharp ZM 35 f1.4. So thanks for opening my eyes...Show more →
thanks, that's great to hear.
i can take a lot of photos in a week, so i'll be posting for a bit. maybe i'll get a film leica at some point too...
sebboh wrote
robgo2 wrote
Sebboh/Derek,I'm really glad that you bought an M10, because it means that you will now be participating in the Leica images thread.
Rob
i did rent the 50 lux asph along with it and directly comparing it to my cv 50/1.5 did finally convince me that the difference there is definitely worth it. so i'll be saving for one of those now...
a random family shot with the 35 lux pre-asph wide open:
http://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1724/40895071110_691a7c40ea_o.jpg
I credit you with stirring my interest in older non-ASPH lenses to use on an SL. As a result, I now own a Summicron-R 35 f2 (v2), Summilux-R 50 f1.4 (E60) and Summilux-R 80 f1.4. I really love the look that these lenses deliver. The R 35 has been a revelation for me. It produces exceedingly rich and deep images, and even though it never gets totally sharp in the corners, I prefer it overall to my razor-sharp ZM 35 f1.4. So thanks for opening my eyes...Show more →
thanks, that's great to hear.
i can take a lot of photos in a week, so i'll be posting for a bit. maybe i'll get a film leica at some point too...
Jun 11, 2018 at 05:43 PM
leonasj
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1597 #7Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
jpeg,handheld
© leonasj 2018
Jun 12, 2018 at 04:41 AM
p.1597 #8Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Absolutely awesome shots on the last page 
Michael, congratulations on the 75 Lux one of my all time favorites. It was Mandler's too
Michael, congratulations on the 75 Lux one of my all time favorites. It was Mandler's too
Jun 12, 2018 at 06:34 AM
p.1597 #9Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Scambiato by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
Monochrom, Elmarit-M 21/2.8
Jun 12, 2018 at 07:31 AM
p.1597 #10Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
M10 + 50mm Summicron
Corona, California © Jay Altman 2018
 |
||
 |
||
|
Corona, California © Jay Altman 2018
Jun 12, 2018 at 12:12 PM
|
p.1597 #11Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
M10 + 50 Summicron
Corona, California © Jay Altman 2018
|
||
 |
||
|
Corona, California © Jay Altman 2018
Jun 12, 2018 at 02:57 PM
p.1597 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Thanks a lot guys. Really appreciated.
M8, cron 75 asph.
M8, cron 75 asph.
Jun 12, 2018 at 07:39 PM
p.1597 #14Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
sebboh wrote:
contax g 21/2.8:
http://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1728/41729396855_2c39a78bfa_o.jpg
I've been wondering, how did the G21 perform regarding magenta colour cast on your loaner M10, particularly on the RHS? Mine is much more problematic on the M240 than it was on the M9.
I believe I have stated this before, probably on the Sony Nex thread, however, like Robgo, two of your images years ago started me on a serial activity buying alt lenses.
The images were of a crow on a ledge, and a fine distant landscape shot of plain and mountains. Before that I had only bought a Leica Elmarit-R 28 (v1). Your images with the Canon FL55 f/1.2 saw me buy that, and I now have maybe 100 alt lenses (or at least that's what my wife seems to think).
Thanks for leading me into temptation / on a path of discovery
David
contax g 21/2.8:
http://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1728/41729396855_2c39a78bfa_o.jpg
I've been wondering, how did the G21 perform regarding magenta colour cast on your loaner M10, particularly on the RHS? Mine is much more problematic on the M240 than it was on the M9.
I believe I have stated this before, probably on the Sony Nex thread, however, like Robgo, two of your images years ago started me on a serial activity buying alt lenses.
The images were of a crow on a ledge, and a fine distant landscape shot of plain and mountains. Before that I had only bought a Leica Elmarit-R 28 (v1). Your images with the Canon FL55 f/1.2 saw me buy that, and I now have maybe 100 alt lenses (or at least that's what my wife seems to think).
Thanks for leading me into temptation / on a path of discovery
David
Jun 12, 2018 at 09:32 PM
p.1597 #15Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
lenticular11 wrote:
http://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1728/41729396855_2c39a78bfa_o.jpgI've been wondering, how did the G21 perform regarding magenta colour cast on your loaner M10, particularly on the RHS? Mine is much more problematic on the M240 than it was on the M9.
I believe I have stated this before, probably on the Sony Nex thread, however, like Robgo, two of your images years ago started me on a serial activity buying alt lenses.
The images were of a crow on a ledge, and a fine distant landscape shot of plain and mountains. Before that I had only bought a Leica Elmarit-R 28 (v1). Your images with the Canon FL55...Show more →
ha, thanks! i know the shots you're talking about. tell your wife i'm sorry and my wife can commiserate.
magenta fringing isn't terrible, but stands out on a blue or grey sky. i haven't tried to correct it in any of the shots i've posted previously. here's a really obvious one:
sebboh wrote
contax g 21/2.8:http://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1728/41729396855_2c39a78bfa_o.jpg
I believe I have stated this before, probably on the Sony Nex thread, however, like Robgo, two of your images years ago started me on a serial activity buying alt lenses.
The images were of a crow on a ledge, and a fine distant landscape shot of plain and mountains. Before that I had only bought a Leica Elmarit-R 28 (v1). Your images with the Canon FL55...Show more →
ha, thanks! i know the shots you're talking about. tell your wife i'm sorry and my wife can commiserate.
magenta fringing isn't terrible, but stands out on a blue or grey sky. i haven't tried to correct it in any of the shots i've posted previously. here's a really obvious one:
Jun 12, 2018 at 10:13 PM
p.1597 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Some quick shots in the garden today...it's easier than getting down to writing a document for a sports club I'm in.
M8, Canon 50 f/1.4 LTM, at f4 (Japanese Summilux)
Feijoa tree in winter by David M, on Flickr
M240, Macro-Elmarit R 60 f/2.8, at f5.6 (apart from exposure and camera/lens profiling, both of these shots have the same PP in LR)
Feijoa tree in winter by David M, on Flickr
M8, Japanese Summilux, f4. In-camera mono. Just resized
Feijoa tree in winter by David M, on Flickr
As before
Marlo by David M, on Flickr
Rest are all M240, Macro-Elmarit R 60 at f5.6
Leaf study by David M, on Flickr
Succulent, with babies by David M, on Flickr
Russet autumn leaves by David M, on Flickr
Strawberry patch with nasturtium by David M, on Flickr
M8, Canon 50 f/1.4 LTM, at f4 (Japanese Summilux)
Feijoa tree in winter by David M, on FlickrM240, Macro-Elmarit R 60 f/2.8, at f5.6 (apart from exposure and camera/lens profiling, both of these shots have the same PP in LR)
Feijoa tree in winter by David M, on FlickrM8, Japanese Summilux, f4. In-camera mono. Just resized
Feijoa tree in winter by David M, on FlickrAs before
Marlo by David M, on FlickrRest are all M240, Macro-Elmarit R 60 at f5.6
Leaf study by David M, on FlickrSucculent, with babies by David M, on FlickrRusset autumn leaves by David M, on FlickrStrawberry patch with nasturtium by David M, on FlickrJun 12, 2018 at 10:39 PM
p.1597 #17Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
M10 + 50 Summicron
Corona, California © Jay Altman 2018
|
||
 |
||
|
Corona, California © Jay Altman 2018
Jun 13, 2018 at 12:27 AM
leonasj
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1597 #19Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
evening
© leonasj 2018
Jun 14, 2018 at 08:56 AM
p.1597 #20Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Sorry, image accidently deleted.
Can this post be deleted?
Edited on Jun 15, 2018 at 10:19 AM · View previous versions
Can this post be deleted?
Edited on Jun 15, 2018 at 10:19 AM · View previous versions
Jun 14, 2018 at 06:54 PM