xwing15 wrote:
Thank you Edward . have the Biogon C 35 2.8 sold and have the summilux financed . and some point to buy it again . because I miss it . the summilux is great . but other than that Zeiss. I love the Biogon!
I see exactly what you mean René. The C Biogon has such a powerful drawing style, impressive for such a small lens
As I already stated I was going to sell my Zeiss 35mm 2.8 biogon when the 35 Lux FLE came back from Leica but I changed my mind. It is a sweet little lens. The DoF scales are so easy to read on the biogon (Thanks again Edward for the advice)
airfrogusmc wrote:
As I already stated I was going to sell my Zeiss 35mm 2.8 biogon when the 35 Lux FLE came back from Leica but I changed my mind. It is a sweet little lens. The DoF scales are so easy to read on the biogon (Thanks again Edward for the advice)
Glad it worked for you Allen. I really love your work, no matter what lens you use
airfrogusmc wrote:
As I already stated I was going to sell my Zeiss 35mm 2.8 biogon when the 35 Lux FLE came back from Leica but I changed my mind. It is a sweet little lens. The DoF scales are so easy to read on the biogon (Thanks again Edward for the advice)
whoever has once loves it! buy again . but in silver .:-)
xwing15 wrote:
whoever has once loves it! buy again . but in silver .:-)
Mine is silver as well, as is the C Sonnar. Really like the silver feel. It looks beautiful on the black M body.
recordproducti wrote:
Pretty sure that was at f/4, though you never can be quite sure with the exif. It has very interesting rendering and bokeh or whatever it's called.
Agree. I find the bokeh is intersting. I have an 50 Lux too.
