pmcmanis wrote:
the good budget lenses, imo, and considering size, are the 24/2.8, 28/3.5, made in japan 50/1.8, silvernose 50/1.4, very high serial number 50/1.4, 50/3.5 macro and 100/2.8.
Out of curiosity, the 28/2.8 supercede the 28/3.5.Why do you reccommed the 28/3.5 and not the 28/2.8? due to the lack of MC?
ManWearPants wrote:
Out of curiosity, the 28/2.8 supercede the 28/3.5.Why do you reccommed the 28/3.5 and not the 28/2.8? due to the lack of MC?
well out of the handful I tried of both I just felt the 3.5 was a little bit better plus it's half the price if such things matter to you.
tbh I like the 35/2.8 but prices on that, at least keh's where you see some actual consistency, are a bit high imo. I do find that I use 28 or 50 more though.
US OPEN 2010
Night session on September 6th, 2010
Canon Rebel XS (1000D)
Zuiko OM 24mm f/2.8
1/100sec
f/~5.6
ISO 400
Stitched from 6 photos, final image is 29Mpix (the camera only makes 10Mpix) http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4145/4972608375_493e2c08a2_b.jpg
this might be the best handling of color I've ever seen out of a digital camera. in fact, I like everything about this shot quite a bit.
out of curiosity, anyone shot with the 250/2 or the 350/2.8? I have heard the story about NASA rating the 250/2 as being the sharpest 35mm lens available at the time, but it just astonishes me the prices they list for.
Beautiful OM-images in this thread, which is gaining popularity.
I was out shooting yesterday. It was a cloudy and rainy day in Guangzhou, China.
China is preparing for the upcoming Asian Games, so construction is speeding up. People working around the clock here.
Some people work less hard, but become rich very quick rich.
Here are a few images:
Canon EOS 5D ,Olympus Zuiko Auto-Zoom 35-80mm f/2.8 ED
