The 100% is equally as sharp. And sorry about the noisy sky, I had to add noise to keep the JPEG
compression from banding. It was pretty bad - so I added noise to the sky area. The lesser of two evils.
That pano is spectacular!
Interesting aproach to banding problem, Bifurcator. I would like to know more about it.
Optionally select Edit -> Fade and select a percentage that looks nice.
In this particular case I had to do it twice. Once I thought was going to be enough but the 24% scaling killed it all so I had to add it to the scaled one again.
BTW, on this site you can add a _ to the beginning of an image URL (filename) and it becomes a link. Maybe easier for quoting so close to the original. Like this:
Photo Collection= a collection of photos. 'A trip to Paris'
Photo Collections= a collection of photo collections. 'Travel pictures' which would have 'A trip to Paris' & others in it.
LightShow wrote:
Photo Collection= a collection of photos. 'A trip to Paris'
Photo Collections= a collection of photo collections. 'Travel pictures' which would have 'A trip to Paris' & others in it.
MWP Photo Collection is fine,
Thanks. I will set it up in LR3 watermark. Anyone knows if there is a way to add a border/frame around the photo in LR3 and maybe include the exif info within the border.
Optionally select Edit -> Fade and select a percentage that looks nice.
In this particular case I had to do it twice. Once I thought was going to be enough but the 24% scaling killed it all so I had to add it to the scaled one again.
BTW, on this site you can add a _ to the beginning of an image URL (filename) and it becomes a link. Maybe easier for quoting so close to the original. Like this:
weekh wrote:
Nice!
Where did u get the lens from? I've been looking around for a while but none is on sale.
Thanks, Wee. I managed to snag one off the ebay a few months back. Yup, hardly see one up for sale on the ebay these days. This is my second copy, still upset with myself for losing the first one.
