This topic is in the 2010 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2010Kodak SLR Image Thread
p.18 #1Kodak SLR Image Thread
Nice, Paul! How do the 760 and SLR/c compare?
Dec 09, 2010 at 01:26 PM
p.18 #2Kodak SLR Image Thread
760 is a Nikon mount, 6MP, and 1.3x crop camera.
I much prefer its body performance over SLR/c ...
However, I think I prefer the images from SLR/c..... nothing wrong with 760....just a personal preference.
The images from SLR/c tends to be bit more brighter, or should I say lively...?
But, I do know that many Kodak DSLR users prefer 760 over any other Kodak DSLR...
I much prefer its body performance over SLR/c ...
However, I think I prefer the images from SLR/c..... nothing wrong with 760....just a personal preference.
The images from SLR/c tends to be bit more brighter, or should I say lively...?
But, I do know that many Kodak DSLR users prefer 760 over any other Kodak DSLR...
Dec 09, 2010 at 01:36 PM
p.18 #3Kodak SLR Image Thread
Yes, the SLR/c body performance is a bit sluggish. The IQ looks indistinguishable between the two.
Dec 09, 2010 at 01:41 PM
p.18 #4Kodak SLR Image Thread
Paul,
are you able to clone out the spots until you are able to clean the sensor? Its very easily done in Photoshop or even DPP.Also do you know if your monitor is calibrated? Some of you Kodak shots look to be a little off on the color and i would suspect monitor possibly.
-Jim
are you able to clone out the spots until you are able to clean the sensor? Its very easily done in Photoshop or even DPP.Also do you know if your monitor is calibrated? Some of you Kodak shots look to be a little off on the color and i would suspect monitor possibly.
-Jim
Dec 11, 2010 at 05:40 PM
p.18 #5Kodak SLR Image Thread
I went back looking through shots made this summer, and the stuff shot with the SLR/c just stands out from the rest. It might not be of everyone's taste, but I really think there's something unique about the files.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5250/5306239893_17c05bc39c_o_d.jpg
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5250/5306239893_17c05bc39c_o_d.jpg
Dec 30, 2010 at 09:33 AM
p.18 #6Kodak SLR Image Thread
I think there is a huge difference of colorization between my laptop and the iMac...
Jim Schemel wrote:
Paul,
are you able to clone out the spots until you are able to clean the sensor? Its very easily done in Photoshop or even DPP.Also do you know if your monitor is calibrated? Some of you shots look to be a little off on the color and i would suspect monitor possibly.
-Jim
Jim Schemel wrote:
Paul,
are you able to clone out the spots until you are able to clean the sensor? Its very easily done in Photoshop or even DPP.Also do you know if your monitor is calibrated? Some of you shots look to be a little off on the color and i would suspect monitor possibly.
-Jim
Dec 30, 2010 at 10:44 AM
p.18 #7Kodak SLR Image Thread
mortyb ...
What lens did you use on that picture...?
It has that contax look.....
What lens did you use on that picture...?
It has that contax look.....
Dec 30, 2010 at 04:00 PM
p.18 #8Kodak SLR Image Thread
It's the 70-200 f4 IS. A great lens BTW.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5282/5307314607_8539168fa5_o_d.jpg
A great lens BTW.http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5282/5307314607_8539168fa5_o_d.jpg
Dec 30, 2010 at 04:20 PM
p.18 #9Kodak SLR Image Thread
I may get flame for saying this, but that 3-D look would not have been possible with the lens and Canon DSLR combo.
Kodak has that ability to bring out unique sharpness and detail.
Kodak has that ability to bring out unique sharpness and detail.
Dec 30, 2010 at 04:29 PM
p.18 #10Kodak SLR Image Thread
Absolutely agree, and I was about to write just that it in my previous post. That lens certainly gave great results on my old 5D, but on the it really shines. In fact, I bought a Canon 100/2, and on the Kodak it's great. This camera has the ability to make a mediocre lens better.
70-200 f4 IS:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5162/5307340485_5733f10aa2_o_d.jpg
70-200 f4 IS:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5162/5307340485_5733f10aa2_o_d.jpg
Dec 30, 2010 at 04:36 PM
p.18 #12Kodak SLR Image Thread
I have used Leica, contax, and ZE lenses on Kodak SLR/c.....
As strange as it may sound, Canon lenses really shine on that camera.....
I have to try my new 70-200 II on that camera ..... perhaps this weekend...
As strange as it may sound, Canon lenses really shine on that camera.....
I have to try my new 70-200 II on that camera ..... perhaps this weekend...
Dec 30, 2010 at 04:45 PM
p.18 #13Kodak SLR Image Thread
mortyb,
outstanding images, and I agree that the lens really manages to impress here.
outstanding images, and I agree that the lens really manages to impress here.
Dec 30, 2010 at 05:08 PM
p.18 #14Kodak SLR Image Thread
Thank you, Luka and dcjs!
Paul, I agree, the Canon lenses do seem to work very well with the . I think I may have to try the 35L. I've used the ZFs on it, and while some of the shots have turned out OK, the files have been very inconsistent in terms of colors and color casts. More so than with Canon lenses. It's like the camera adjusts something according to what lens is being mounted. I've only used unchipped adapters with the ZFs.
70-200 F4 IS:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5162/5307931638_18021527c0_o_d.jpg
Paul, I agree, the Canon lenses do seem to work very well with the . I think I may have to try the 35L.
I've used the ZFs on it, and while some of the shots have turned out OK, the files have been very inconsistent in terms of colors and color casts. More so than with Canon lenses. It's like the camera adjusts something according to what lens is being mounted. I've only used unchipped adapters with the ZFs.70-200 F4 IS:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5162/5307931638_18021527c0_o_d.jpg
Dec 30, 2010 at 05:30 PM
p.18 #15Kodak SLR Image Thread
Nice stuff. No. 2 has some 3D going on, I think.
Dec 30, 2010 at 05:51 PM
p.18 #16Kodak SLR Image Thread
correct me if I am wrong but for a landscape shooter, either a used SLR/C or SLR/N seem like good alternatives to a used 5D?
Dec 30, 2010 at 07:43 PM
p.18 #17Kodak SLR Image Thread
pauljas wrote:
correct me if I am wrong but for a landscape shooter, either a used SLR/C or SLR/N seem like good alternatives to a used 5D?
A SLR/C or SLR/N might actually be a better choice.
correct me if I am wrong but for a landscape shooter, either a used SLR/C or SLR/N seem like good alternatives to a used 5D?
A SLR/C or SLR/N might actually be a better choice.
Dec 30, 2010 at 08:08 PM
p.18 #18Kodak SLR Image Thread
I'd go so far as to say probably, certainly is. Few people talk about the low ISO capabilities of these cameras, where it samples multiple frames, virtually eliminating noise. I've yet to play with it, personally, but the fact that you can have such a stunningly realistic image with accurate colors and virtually no noise should make it a hands down winner over most others.
Dec 31, 2010 at 06:16 PM
p.18 #20Kodak SLR Image Thread
This combo can do B&W too.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5168/5319284565_53a51efd77_o_d.jpg
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5168/5319284565_53a51efd77_o_d.jpg
Jan 03, 2011 at 05:36 AM