rsolti13 wrote:
Everybody give permission for me to hang your work on my walls You guys are awesome. What a treat it is to come to work and read a couple pages of Zeiss pics
rsolti13 wrote:
Everybody give permission for me to hang your work on my walls You guys are awesome. What a treat it is to come to work and read a couple pages of Zeiss pics
+3 (although I assume you rather mean landscapes than portraits like I do)
anyway, I guess ...
(D3, ZF28, f/4, Tate National, London on New Year's day 2010)
philber wrote:
Boris, looking at the first picture, it seems like the 21 would have made for an even more spectacular view. Is that not the case?
Hmm, maybe, maybe not. I think the reason, that I didn't used the 21 in this situation was, that the foreground and the sky were not interesting enough for the wide angle of the 21. But maybe I was wrong.
As always great shots Hugo. It's nice to see your shots in a higher resolution.
One technical comment - I can see from the EXIF that you shot the second one at f/18. I'm guessing you did it to get a longer exposure but just in case you didn't know, the 21 starts becoming a bit dull and flat above f/8 due to diffraction. Already at f/16 it has lost a lot of its brilliance. Unless I really need longer exposers or want to produce diffraction stars, I try to avoid going above f/8.
You guys are awesome. What a treat it is to come to work and read a couple pages of Zeiss pics
Luka, really like the last one. Very creative. 
