This topic is in the 2009 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2009Contax N Image Thread
p.8 #1Contax N Image Thread
Paul Yi wrote:
I
With N24-85 .... I think this is one of the best walk around lens....
+1 Other than the conspicuous size of the front element.
I
With N24-85 .... I think this is one of the best walk around lens....
+1 Other than the conspicuous size of the front element.
Feb 10, 2010 at 03:15 PM
p.8 #2Contax N Image Thread
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/96/407096.jpg
Paul Yi wrote:
Except for double edge bokeh on certain situations, I don't mind the look of the bokeh from N100/2.8....
N100/2.8 from yesterday....
Very 3d to me (post 25 page 7), like looking through a window without the pane of glass to muck it up. Bokeh is good enough for me too, especially in the last three. Sharp as a tack wide open at f/2.8.
The other post is labeled as 100N, but the EXIF says 50mm, with a shutter speed but no aperture given. Seems like the EXIF of an Alt lens with a chipped adapter on it, like maybe your CZ 100 f/2 I think. (re: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/850075/6#8095489 ). The bokeh does look different/worse in that post, as noted in posts that followed it.
Paul Yi wrote:
Except for double edge bokeh on certain situations, I don't mind the look of the bokeh from N100/2.8....
N100/2.8 from yesterday....
Very 3d to me (post 25 page 7), like looking through a window without the pane of glass to muck it up. Bokeh is good enough for me too, especially in the last three. Sharp as a tack wide open at f/2.8.
The other post is labeled as 100N, but the EXIF says 50mm, with a shutter speed but no aperture given. Seems like the EXIF of an Alt lens with a chipped adapter on it, like maybe your CZ 100 f/2 I think. (re: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/850075/6#8095489 ). The bokeh does look different/worse in that post, as noted in posts that followed it.
Feb 12, 2010 at 11:54 PM
p.8 #3Contax N Image Thread
Lotusm50 wrote:
The Kodak SLR/c and SLR/n (I have an SLR/n) are 14 mp. At low ISO, it blows the 5D out of the water. Not sure how it compares to the 21mp Canons, but I would guess that it is not far off.
I've found the Kodak SLR/c has richer/truer colors, much higher edge accutance, a nicer contrast curve - at or below it base ISO (ISO160 is it's base, but it goes DOWN to ISO6). The resolution is very close to my 5DII, with a quality lens. With good light I prefer the files from the SLR/c over my 5DII. The SLR/c files also seem to print nicer.
After seeing the latest 17-35N pics I'm a little disappointed that I sold mine instead of getting it converted. I would have loved to see how it performs on the Kodak and 5DII.
wayne seltzer wrote
Kodak SLR has no AA filter and a more vivid color fingerprint than canon/nikon.But is only 10 or 12 mp so I wouldn't think it could still compete resolution wise with the newer 21-24mp cameras.I think Paul,pdmphoto, used to own one and would know more.I've found the Kodak SLR/c has richer/truer colors, much higher edge accutance, a nicer contrast curve - at or below it base ISO (ISO160 is it's base, but it goes DOWN to ISO6). The resolution is very close to my 5DII, with a quality lens. With good light I prefer the files from the SLR/c over my 5DII. The SLR/c files also seem to print nicer.
After seeing the latest 17-35N pics I'm a little disappointed that I sold mine instead of getting it converted. I would have loved to see how it performs on the Kodak and 5DII.
Feb 13, 2010 at 01:08 AM
p.8 #4Contax N Image Thread
Erichard said,
The other post is labeled as 100N, but the EXIF says 50mm, with a shutter speed but no aperture given. Seems like the EXIF of an Alt lens with a chipped adapter on it, like maybe your CZ 100 f/2 I think. (re: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/850075/6#8095489 ). The bokeh does look different/worse in that post, as noted in posts that followed it.
You're right....my bad.
Those were from C/Y Planar 100/2.0 ....
Thank you for correcting me.
The other post is labeled as 100N, but the EXIF says 50mm, with a shutter speed but no aperture given. Seems like the EXIF of an Alt lens with a chipped adapter on it, like maybe your CZ 100 f/2 I think. (re: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/850075/6#8095489 ). The bokeh does look different/worse in that post, as noted in posts that followed it.
You're right....my bad.
Those were from C/Y Planar 100/2.0 ....
Thank you for correcting me.
Feb 13, 2010 at 02:30 PM
p.8 #5Contax N Image Thread
I like this one Paul. Looks like you used a milder version of that profile you used in that other thread and got the best of both worlds in this image.
Feb 14, 2010 at 02:28 AM
p.8 #6Contax N Image Thread
Thanks....
I just adjusted a little bit of shadow/highlights slider...
I'm beginning to like the picture style myself...
I just adjusted a little bit of shadow/highlights slider...
I'm beginning to like the picture style myself...
Feb 14, 2010 at 06:09 AM
p.8 #7Contax N Image Thread
Wow... Beautiful clouds blending with mountains...
Feb 15, 2010 at 11:06 PM
p.8 #8Contax N Image Thread
zombii wrote:
I like this one Paul. Looks like you used a milder version of that profile you used in that other thread and got the best of both worlds in this image.
+1 ... Nice
any Exif data (i.e. aperture, ISO, FL) ??
I like this one Paul. Looks like you used a milder version of that profile you used in that other thread and got the best of both worlds in this image.
+1 ... Nice
any Exif data (i.e. aperture, ISO, FL) ??
Feb 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM
p.8 #9Contax N Image Thread
Yeah....I gave a little more brightness....on that my custom picture style.
Here is the exif.
f/8
1/1000 sec
ISO 100
at 23 mm
Here is the exif.
f/8
1/1000 sec
ISO 100
at 23 mm
Feb 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM
p.8 #10Contax N Image Thread
Paul,
are you getting any work done? You have been posting like a mad man lately.Good to see you enjoying your new toys
-Jim
are you getting any work done? You have been posting like a mad man lately.Good to see you enjoying your new toys
-Jim
Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57 PM
p.8 #11Contax N Image Thread
I don't know too much about technical aspects of gear or photography...
So, I speak with pictures...
You're right....I should get back to work....
So, I speak with pictures...
You're right....I should get back to work....
Feb 18, 2010 at 04:06 PM
p.8 #13Contax N Image Thread
Paul,
Only real difference seems to be just the color.I think you are in the best position to judge.Which of the two seems to show the true color of the building and the sky? That is the one i would go for
-Jim
Only real difference seems to be just the color.I think you are in the best position to judge.Which of the two seems to show the true color of the building and the sky? That is the one i would go for
-Jim
Feb 19, 2010 at 04:17 PM
p.8 #14Contax N Image Thread
The true color of the sky was the first one....
But, I thought the second one was more dramatic.... a little more punch to the flag....
But, I thought the second one was more dramatic.... a little more punch to the flag....
Feb 19, 2010 at 04:50 PM
p.8 #15Contax N Image Thread
Paul Yi wrote:
The true color of the sky was the first one....
But, I thought the second one was more dramatic.... a little more punch to the flag....
The first one looks terribly oversharpened.
The true color of the sky was the first one....
But, I thought the second one was more dramatic.... a little more punch to the flag....
The first one looks terribly oversharpened.
Feb 19, 2010 at 05:01 PM
p.8 #16Contax N Image Thread
Sharp eye....
The only difference between the two is ... the first one was "sharpen edged".
The only difference between the two is ... the first one was "sharpen edged".
Feb 19, 2010 at 05:04 PM
p.8 #17Contax N Image Thread
Grasmuc, your third shot just blew my mind! Congratulations! What is/was this place? A concert scene maybe?
Mar 01, 2010 at 01:01 AM
p.8 #18Contax N Image Thread
thanks philber
the third pic is from panyu square at guangzhou, china
you are right, it was a temporary concert scene
they were testing the lighting
christoph
the third pic is from panyu square at guangzhou, china
you are right, it was a temporary concert scene
they were testing the lighting
christoph
Mar 01, 2010 at 09:12 AM
p.8 #19Contax N Image Thread
grasmuc
Thanks for posting the images from the 50/1.4 - as I have one out for conversion and hoping it's a keeper. Your images certainly make it look as such - the stage / lighting image is awesome!
Thanks for posting the images from the 50/1.4 - as I have one out for conversion and hoping it's a keeper. Your images certainly make it look as such - the stage / lighting image is awesome!
Mar 04, 2010 at 11:39 AM
p.8 #20Contax N Image Thread
Hey Doc,
Great sculpture shot - it blends in well with the snow & gray light day. Have you ever used that lens at 17mm f2.8? It vignettes a bit but can be composed into the image nicely.
Great sculpture shot - it blends in well with the snow & gray light day. Have you ever used that lens at 17mm f2.8? It vignettes a bit but can be composed into the image nicely.
Mar 04, 2010 at 11:43 AM