Ataboy wrote:
Thanks! I guess my copy of the 70-200N is brilliant, that's why I could never understand why they are regarded with less respect than 24-85. It beats Canon 70-200/4 IS and Contax 80-200/4 for example.
Ataboy,
I have always been on the fence about N70-200 and EF70-200IS. I chose the latter since the IS provides more handheld keepers. Can you elaborate more on why the N is better - more DoF, better bokeh, etc? I prefer the much smaller footprint of the N but am wary that 100-200mm range is easily ruined by handshakes.