p.17 #15 · Post your Canon 200mm f/2 (200/2) shots!
AW, those are some nice shots and really cool panoramic stitching. I've always wondered how a 200 f/2 would do a brenzier, and now I know. Thanks, bud!
p.17 #19 · Post your Canon 200mm f/2 (200/2) shots!
Pixel Perfect wrote:
Damn I hate this thread
My criticism with the thread, like the 85L and 135L threads, is that too many photos are just a demonstration of blurry backgrounds, rather than photos of any substance...myself included.
Background blur is not a crutch for lighting, subject, composition and post processing nous though
p.17 #20 · Post your Canon 200mm f/2 (200/2) shots!
Dawei Ye wrote:
My criticism with the thread, like the 85L and 135L threads, is that too many photos are just a demonstration of blurry backgrounds, rather than photos of any substance...myself included.
Background blur is not a crutch for lighting, subject, composition and post processing nous though
That said there are some great shots in here!
Dawel pls show us photos of substance. I think a prime reason to spend so much money on primes is for the blur that a large aperture affords. If not for that then why carry so heavy gear and be limited to one focal length?
I think a prime reason to spend so much money on primes is for the blur that a large aperture affords. If not for that then why carry so heavy gear and be limited to one focal length?