fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              81              83              103       104       end
  

Archive 2009 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!

  
 
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #1 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Rich Swanner wrote:
I can't get many birds here lately. So I have been doing Macros with my new monopod....


Great shot Rich! Monopods are totally awesome. I use mine all the time for static shots.



Jun 18, 2009 at 02:40 AM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #2 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


pingflood wrote:
Too quiet here...

Is this a cormorant? Damn thing went underwater for a LOOOONG time while I was watching it. No wonder I always see them sitting on the side of the lagoons trying to dry out!


Terrific colors Ping. Love the pose too!



Jun 18, 2009 at 02:40 AM
Rich Swanner
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #3 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


WOW!!! AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Jun 18, 2009 at 02:56 AM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #4 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Rich Swanner wrote:
WOW!!! AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who are you WOWing at Rich?



Jun 18, 2009 at 03:14 AM
Rich Swanner
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #5 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Love Snowys........... http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_9704_edited-3copy.jpg

Edited on Jun 24, 2009 at 02:53 AM · View previous versions



Jun 18, 2009 at 03:21 AM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #6 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Ya snowys are great. Difficult to expose though...


Jun 18, 2009 at 03:27 AM
Rich Swanner
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #7 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Double WOW!!!! They are why I shoot RAW all the time........


Jun 18, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #8 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Ya I guess I've got to bite the bullet and shoot RAW!


Jun 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Rich Swanner
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #9 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Conrad, try the smaller RAW files with the 50D. I shot some flowers in the mountains and I always have smallest Jpeg with the RAW files to view them and get an idea of what the RAW will look like. The Jpeg backgrounds are alot of times blown out and noisy while the RAW is not. The smaller RAW file would give you control without the big file size . I have a dedicated 750 hard drive just for pics and it holds all the big files. 8GB cards are $40-80 on sale and in deals everywhere.


Jun 18, 2009 at 11:16 AM
abqnmusa
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #10 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


People can argue full frame vs. crops until the cows come home
It all just becomes chatter & personal perference

choose the format you prefer, or both and be happy



Jun 18, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #11 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Rich Swanner wrote:
Conrad, try the smaller RAW files with the 50D. I shot some flowers in the mountains and I always have smallest Jpeg with the RAW files to view them and get an idea of what the RAW will look like. The Jpeg backgrounds are alot of times blown out and noisy while the RAW is not. The smaller RAW file would give you control without the big file size . I have a dedicated 750 hard drive just for pics and it holds all the big files. 8GB cards are $40-80 on sale and in deals everywhere.



Thats true... I'll try RAW out and see how much of a pain it is to edit each file...



Jun 18, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #12 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


abqnmusa wrote:
People can argue full frame vs. crops until the cows come home
It all just becomes chatter & personal perference

choose the format you prefer, or both and be happy



I'm pretty happy with capturing the shots, but am sometimes regretful when the images are blown. I'll have to do some experimenting. Might just be joining the RAW camp soon, or just shoot when the light is right. Hehe...



Jun 18, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Rich Swanner
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #13 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


My Eagle from Tuesday at Buck's Lake California.. 6500ft Near Quincy Ca. http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc150/blackies_owner/_MG_1954_edited-2.jpg


Jun 18, 2009 at 02:52 PM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #14 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Very deep and rich black color Rich. Love those shots!


Jun 18, 2009 at 03:35 PM
pingflood
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.82 #15 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Conrad's back, and with some nice shots!

Got my 393 head today, might stick it on a monopod and practice. It's HUGE, and I mean HUGE. Makes my 1DsII+1.4x+400 look small when mounted. Definitely works as advertised, when balanced and tension set I can move the whole mess around with my pinky and it'll stay put in any position.

Of course, still need to practice good long lens technique, no matter how decent a mount you have...



Jun 18, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #16 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


pingflood wrote:
Conrad's back, and with some nice shots!

Got my 393 head today, might stick it on a monopod and practice. It's HUGE, and I mean HUGE. Makes my 1DsII+1.4x+400 look small when mounted. Definitely works as advertised, when balanced and tension set I can move the whole mess around with my pinky and it'll stay put in any position.

Of course, still need to practice good long lens technique, no matter how decent a mount you have...


Sweet Ping! Can you please put up a photo of you standing with it fully geared up? I'm pretty interested and want to see the scale of what we're talking about. And thanks for the kind words!



Jun 18, 2009 at 04:08 PM
pingflood
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.82 #17 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Sure, I'll snap one tomorrow -- raining here now.

I did go out and grab this shot earlier this evening, hand held though... just noticed him hanging out in the tree and ran out there. He got mad at me I think; took off, circled around, squawked at me, and then flew away.

http://beyondthematrix.com/VH0M6226.jpg



Jun 18, 2009 at 06:50 PM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #18 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Terrific colors Ping!


Jun 18, 2009 at 06:59 PM
philtax
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #19 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


Hi Conrad,

Glad to see you back. On the RAW vs. jpeg question, why not just shoot RAW + jpeg and toss the RAW files unless you need them to recover highlights. I know the pain with RAW files as I only shoot RAW and it can take quite a lot of work to make them look like anything at all. Also, I had to buy a 2 TB disk to accommodate my growing pile of files. What really kills me is that when I convert the 5d II files from RAW into PS they mushroom to 200MB, and that's before any adjustment layers.

Also, I really enjoyed those snowy egret shots. You really caught the action and most of them didn't look too badly blown out on my monitor. Didn't check the histograms of course.

Lastly, I just want to say for the record that I've been waiting for quite a while for Noelle to weigh in with some bird shots, and I miss her contributions.

Cheers,

Phil




Jun 18, 2009 at 10:28 PM
Conrad Tan
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.82 #20 · 400mm is "getting" sharp enough!


philtax wrote:
Hi Conrad,

Glad to see you back. On the RAW vs. jpeg question, why not just shoot RAW + jpeg and toss the RAW files unless you need them to recover highlights. I know the pain with RAW files as I only shoot RAW and it can take quite a lot of work to make them look like anything at all. Also, I had to buy a 2 TB disk to accommodate my growing pile of files. What really kills me is that when I convert the 5d II files from RAW into PS they mushroom to 200MB, and that's before
...Show more

Hey thanks Phil. I'll be doing that when the conditions are poor from now on (jpg+raw) as I really could have used the extra options raw affords with the white burds. I completely agree with you though about getting the extra memory, extra time to PP, and extra effort it takes to make a picture right.. kind of a pain. Haha!

As far as Noelle, I think she's made quite a nice ring of new friends in the N&W forum and we won't be seeing her much here anymore. But I'm still here! We can still put up our efforts and learn from each other.



Jun 19, 2009 at 01:19 AM
1       2       3              81              83              103       104       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              81              83              103       104       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account