fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
FM Forum Rules
Wedding Resource List
  

FM Forums | Wedding Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              end
  

Archive 2008 · $500 weddings

  
 
abam
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #1 · $500 weddings


"the folks doing cheap weddings are screwing themselves *and* the industry."

it's just competition. if you're not offering a product that is clearly worth the premium price, natural selection will remove you eventually from the competition pool.

i'm sure it's a hard pill to swallow for a lot of people, finding out that fairly artistic uncle seth with his 5D can do 90% of the job of a lot of "professionals," at 25% the price.



Nov 30, 2008 at 01:25 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #2 · $500 weddings


jcolman wrote:
So what I did was to book a couple of $500 weddings where the brides took a chance with me. I never once thought about shooting for free. Why? Because I'm too good at what I do to give it away.

I mentioned your situation. Comes under attitude. "I'm too good to give it away, but I'm not working for free". But you say you're good, just not good enough? You have much to learn it's true - charge the proper amount or don't charge at all. It's fine to be $100 under your comp or offer a bigger album - give the bride a reason to try the new guy. It's also to OK to improve and find out that your work is worth $4500 instead of $1500. It happens but not all that often.
Look at what a photog that is charging $3000 or $4500 is giving a client in style, product, etc. Can you do that too? If not you're not getting that price as brides do shop around and will compare what you have to offer to others in your price range.

But you need to give the bride a reason to choose you other than price. Someone else will always be cheaper. There are no winners in the war of who can do it for less. Ask the wedding photogs in Philly that last year got $500 to 600 for shoot and burns till that big studio went under. Now a shoot and burn, experienced photog can be had for $250 and there is a line of them to work for that. Add more photogs and that price will drop even more.

jcolman wrote:
As my wedding skills continue to improve, my rates will go up. By this time next year, my rates will probably be up around $1700 or more. Two years from now I'd like to be in the $3000 range and that will come with time and skill.


Ever had a new business open up around you? I don't mean a chain deal, but a mom and pop restaruant, pizza joint, coffee shop? What do they charge compared to the competition? Same price huh? They may run a few grand opening specials and pay their employees less cause they are new and learning. But they do not sell their products for less. Never.
Key here is they didn't open for business until they had a plan and knew what they were doing. They're not asking their clients to pay them for their education.

So the first question they need to answer is, are they going to compete with McDonalds or Chilis? Both sell burgers and fries but they are after different market segments, service is different, presentation/experience is different and pricing is different. They are not going to start out competing with mcdonals then next year, you know, when teh cook gets better, double prices add waitresses and compete with Chilis. Doesn't happen in resturants, retail, hair salons - any business.

WOM is the number 1 best way to grow your business. Shoot a lot of $1700 weddings and WOM will bring you clients - at $1700 per. Now double your prices and what happens? You have to start this WOM all over again! (that means brides, parents, guests, venues, other vendors - all of it)

Believe me, I totally understand the 'need' to start small or simple and grow. I understand the desire to gain experience. I understand the need to buy gear and that it costs money.
I also know a few other things you may not, but will if you survive long enough to find out. It takes about 3 years for WOM to get moving. It costs what it costs to run a business - in time, office space, software, supplies, accounting - any business be that making hoagies, cars or pictures.
You are starting from scratch and there are no policies, procedures, filing system, paperwork, etc. And as you get busier that will have to evolve. (This is the hardest part for me to deal with BTW)

But I know it's better off to spend a year learning for free and planning all the stuff you need - prices, packages, products, filing, workflows (editing and paper and marketing, etc) then step into the business where you want it to be. Trying to figure this out as you go takes a HUGE amount of time that should be better spent marketing and schmoozing customers.

Let me share what I know about this first hand.
I'm in year 4 starting from nothing. Literally. I shot 3 weddings for free and then opened shop. I started with a 0% credit card and at the rate of about $1000 a month I bought stuff. I paid about $1000 a month off too - so I'm sorta paying as I go.

What I got, what you'll get is Cheap Weddings ($1200 say). CHeap weddings have cheap venues, no limos, etc. You DO NOT get the kind of images that a $5000 bride will want to see. Not gonna happen. She's at the Marriott your at the VFW. This is the reality. You work with other cheap vendors ($400 florists, $500 DJs, etc. All are often weekend warriors. None are good for referrals).

Around here the average wedding costs $25,000 and photography is $1800-2400 (first time 20 year old bride and 30 year old or second time professionals are the low end/high end quoted here - it DOES make a difference on who's paying also. Mom will spend more than Jane and John)

Granted, I do more than just weddings, but for 08 I've got some 18 weddings on the books at just above $2100 per. I've got like crap for next year at this point.

Scenario 2 is Don. He got bumped from his job when his company merged and left town. He took about 16 months to get into teh wedding biz, taking his photo hobby and turning it into a business. He joined the local PPA group, got active and met the members. He took a couple of PPA weeklong classes. He offered to second shoot for free if he could use the images for his portfolio. He second shot under 6 different photographers over a 5 county area. From cheapie deals to where the photog got $10,000. PJ, traditional, film - he's seen it all at this point. He's been to (and has pics of) every major venue in the tri state area. He can talk the talk about all of them to a bridal prospect - "yeah, I'v been to The WCC, John is real nice there" - goes a LONG way to getting a booking, let me tell you!
He had a year to see how it's done - many ways of doing it. What gear works, works for him? What gear isn't worth the cost and hassle? What kind of lighting works for formals in a church? Outisde? What happens when it rains? Best way to use a limo for pictures, in teh day, the dark, etc?
So he worked for free for that year. Then he signed up for every bridal show he could and started his pricing at $2000, aiming for $3500 average. He's booking 30 a year at about $2700 per.

Lets do the math, shall we?

3 years in I had shot 30 weddings at $1600 each. $48,000, right? $16,00 a year avg.
Less than 3 years into it (including the year he spent working for free) Don has shot 28 weddings at $2700 per..That's $75,600. More than $25,000 a year, average.

Did he work for free for that year? No, not really. He showed patience, planned well and it's paying off very well for him.

I'd be better off to close up shop under my current name and relaunch under a new name at a new price point and start over! It'd be easier than trying to move upmarket.

It would seem to be common sense to do your homework before you try and open a business. Just because you own a camera and take a picture does not mean you are qualified to open a photography business any more than having a toaster and making toast means you can open a restaurant or that if you can wash clothes you can open a laundramat.
You would not invest in a strangers start up business if he told you "I want to open a pizza shop. I'm gonna charge 1/2 what anyone else charges until I can make really good pizzas, then I'm gonna double my prices! And then in another year raise them 50% more cause I'll be good and everyone will know it! Now lend me $50,000 so I can do it, OK?" Why not? Cause you know instinctively that the idea of selling for 1/2 price and doubling prices won't work. So why in the hell do you think it works in photography?








Nov 30, 2008 at 01:47 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #3 · $500 weddings


Sam Obeid wrote:
Everyone should pay MSRP for gear too, if you don't you'll ruin the industry!

There will always be customers in every price point, the market will always decide how high you can go.


When did you last visit a local camera store? You know, the kind where you can touch a 5D2 and compare it to a D700? Check out the different Bogen tripods? Ask the counter guy about filters and see what bag you like best?

Oh, like 10 years ago, huh? There are no more camera stores. Ever stop to wonder why?



Nov 30, 2008 at 01:49 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #4 · $500 weddings


abam wrote:
"the folks doing cheap weddings are screwing themselves *and* the industry."

it's just competition. if you're not offering a product that is clearly worth the premium price, natural selection will remove you eventually from the competition pool.

i'm sure it's a hard pill to swallow for a lot of people, finding out that fairly artistic uncle seth with his 5D can do 90% of the job of a lot of "professionals," at 25% the price.



There will always be someone else will to do it faster and cheaper. You cannot compete on price alone and survive. You MUST give the customer a reason to choose you over other photographers besides price.

I mean, really - if we all put an 8x10 shot down in front a bride to be and asked her to pick the best one she'd have a hard time - they'd all be pretty good, right? So other than price what have YOU got to offer her to get into her wallet? If you don't know what it is then you'll never be able to tell her what it is either.



Nov 30, 2008 at 01:52 PM
Sam Obeid
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #5 · $500 weddings


prof_fate wrote:
When did you last visit a local camera store? You know, the kind where you can touch a 5D2 and compare it to a D700? Check out the different Bogen tripods? Ask the counter guy about filters and see what bag you like best?

Oh, like 10 years ago, huh? There are no more camera stores. Ever stop to wonder why?


Not sure what your point is in response to what I wrote, you're not making a lot of sense. Half my gear is from a camera shop and the other half I bought used. I have 1 flash and 4 CF cards that were bought online.



Nov 30, 2008 at 02:27 PM
jcolman
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #6 · $500 weddings


prof fate,

I'm not going to quote your lenghty post but you do raise some good points. You've given me things to consider.

I'm in a somewhat different situation than you in that I have a full time job but I'm looking to retire in three years. My plan is to grow the wedding business until I feel that I can walk away from my day job. This means that I don't have the time to devote my full energy to growing my business just yet. I'm not worried about the equipment. I bought enough gear to get me started and then some. In fact I kind of overbought but I'd rather have too much gear than not enough.

The only thing holding me back from charging $3000 for a wedding at the moment is lack of experience at shooting weddings and lack of experience in setting up the business side. My photography skills are, in my opinion, almost good enough. I've been behind a camera all my adult life, mostly in video and film production, but my still photography skills were a bit rusty when I started my business last June. Nevertheless I've been practicing and studying the work of others.

Perhaps you're right. Maybe I should simply up my prices to reflect where I want to be instead of where I am. However, that would also require me to spend more time leaning the business, time which I simply don't have at the moment.



Nov 30, 2008 at 04:09 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #7 · $500 weddings


Sam Obeid wrote:
Not sure what your point is in response to what I wrote, you're not making a lot of sense. Half my gear is from a camera shop and the other half I bought used. I have 1 flash and 4 CF cards that were bought online.


You seem to be saying that by not buying a MSRP, which infers a local camera store, the industry will be ruined. Well, with most folks buying mailorder the local camera store 'industry' has been destroyed. Why? The buyer's mentality of 'same thing for less money' did it. A D3 is a D3 whether you buy it at bestbuy, B&h, ebay or Sam's Camera and Film on main street. But when you need service or want to inquire about which is better, the D3 or 1D3 or any of that there is no local place to go.

To an extent the internet (forums like this) have replaced main street. Is it good or bad? Depends. Sam there who no longer has a business might think it's a bad thing. The newbie is certainly hurting for local help. It's changed how canon or nikon etc market. No more local reps are needed, no more salesman training - but no more salesman. It's more disjointed and impersonal.

Will the wedding photography industry follow suit? Will the weekend warrior or shoot and burn mentality make a difference? Ask the album companies and yes, these things are affecting them so it is making a difference.

Will it ruin the industry? Define ruin. Will you be able to make a living shooting weddings and not having to have a second (or first) job? Quite possibly. Only time will tell.

We need to stop thinking of what's best for the consumer and start thinking of what's best for us. Selling albums makes us more money. If a bride calls four photogs and we're all selling albums and about $3000 for wedding coverage then she'll spend $3000 and get an album. We ARE the industry and we will benefit. We ARE not the consumers and should not be thinking like them. We are NOT buying what we are selling so should not be of the mind "Well, I wouldn't pay $3500 for my work so why would anyone else?"

Remember that no one is going to pay you more than ask. If you only think your work is worth $500 or 1200 or whatever then that's all you going to get paid for it. You can get 10 times better but if you don't ask for more money you will not get it.



Nov 30, 2008 at 04:32 PM
Lucky_Dog
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #8 · $500 weddings


jcolman wrote:
prof fate,

I'm not going to quote your lenghty post but you do raise some good points. You've given me things to consider.

I'm in a somewhat different situation than you in that I have a full time job but I'm looking to retire in three years. My plan is to grow the wedding business until I feel that I can walk away from my day job. This means that I don't have the time to devote my full energy to growing my business just yet. I'm not worried about the equipment. I bought enough gear to get me started and then
...Show more

You and I have about the same plan.... good luck to you! I'd like to be full time photgrapher in a few years -- I need about five more to retire.



Nov 30, 2008 at 04:34 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #9 · $500 weddings


jcolman wrote:
The only thing holding me back from charging $3000 for a wedding at the moment is lack of experience at shooting weddings and lack of experience in setting up the business side. .


BS. The only thing holding you back from charging $3000 is your confidence. You don't feel confident that if you ask for it they'll pay it. Hey, you have a day job so if they don't pay you've nothing to lose. What happens in three years when you have no backup income? What crystal ball have you got that says you'll be better in three years? Or that the market will be there? Or that there won't be so many photogs around you that you can get this? Or that perhaps RED will obsolete wedding still photogs altogether?

Note that you are saying "bride's won't pay $3000 for my work". You're not asking them for $3000 so of course they're not going to pay you that much.

Will you pay for $8 for a hamburger? Sure, but not at mcdonalds. Why not? I mean, if you offered them $8 for a big mac would they take it? Perhaps, but no one is going to offer them more than they are asking. Period.

A new cook starts at chilis so they lower the price of their hamburgers? I dont' think so.

Business side expeince - what are you taking about exaclty? Planning? Accounting? Advertising? Marketing? Website? Except maybe some advertising you need to do all this about the same whether you charge $5 or $5000. Often the difference is look and that usually costs no more than some thought and time, perhaps a few bucks but not much.
A one font, one size, third generation xerox pricelist is fine for $500 weddings, but if you want $5000 it needs to look more upscale. So work on that. Otherwise the business side is just repetition.

Wedding experience you can get just by joining local PPA, meet other photogs and offer to second shoot. Tell them you want to learn and they'll be happy to oblige. It's part of PPA's credo and ethics.
The only way to get experience is to shoot weddings. So the one theory is charge less and work more. Problem is you want to shoot $3000 weddings. You need practice at $3000 weddings! There is a difference in the clientele from $500 and $3000. People spend money on what they value - I won't buy a $50 bottle of wine or spend the extra to have a new car or designer clothes. I will buy starbucks and name brand foods at the grocery store.
So a bride spending $500 places little value on the photography. The one spending $3000 places more value on it. So what? Work with them and you'll see the difference.



Nov 30, 2008 at 04:46 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #10 · $500 weddings


Lucky_Dog wrote:
You and I have about the same plan.... good luck to you! I'd like to be full time photgrapher in a few years -- I need about five more to retire.


A plan is essential.
I had a plan. And I have a plan. They are vastly different.

I started out planning to shoot 20 weddings a year for the low end folks - you know, those that 'cant afford a wedding photographer'.
I learned a few things that changed my mind on that. So I upped my prices and the plan was to shoot 15 to 20 weddings. I am a stay at home dad so that plan was to last for 4 or 5 years - till my youngest was in gradeschool all day.

For 2008 weddings only provided 55% of my income (so far). I found out there is demand in my area for senior pics, quality T&I and baby potraiture.

So I suppose my willingness to say sure, I'll do that other stuff too can be to blame for my being a lot busier and building a studio that was not in the original plan.

The studio came about when I lost a couple of brides cause I had no way to do e-shots in the middle of winter. So I spent the bucks, got the knowlege and turned my basement into a studio. Then I had to find revenue to pay for it cause 10 e-sessions wasn't going to do it.

If you've got 5 years till you retire that's perfect to join PPA, second shoot - get to know the business. Being connected to your fellow, local, photogs has benefits far behond dollars. One is you have like minded people to call on when you need a question answered, to borrow gear, to get help if you need a second shooter or get sick, can refer weddings back and forth to, etc.
Spend your time wisely and you can step into a wedding business the way you want it to be.



Nov 30, 2008 at 04:56 PM
Sam Obeid
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #11 · $500 weddings


prof_fate wrote:
You seem to be saying that by not buying a MSRP, which infers a local camera store, the industry will be ruined.


I see where this went wrong, (love the Internet), I was actually being factious and poking fun at the people that whine about $500 photogs. No one is paying (that I know) MSRP but the camera industry is still surviving, it's forever changing but still surviving. I'm a Free Market/Laissez-faire thinking person. Don't worry about the $500 photog, they'll always come and go because it can't be sustained. If you're a 3000-5000 or 25000 photog the $500 Brides are not going to contact you just like Wal-Mart shoppers don't shop at Neman Marcus. So for the most part I think we agree.



Nov 30, 2008 at 05:12 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #12 · $500 weddings


Sam Obeid wrote:
I see where this went wrong, (love the Internet), I was actually being factious and poking fun at the people that whine about $500 photogs. No one is paying (that I know) MSRP but the camera industry is still surviving, it's forever changing but still surviving. I'm a Free Market/Laissez-faire thinking person. Don't worry about the $500 photog, they'll always come and go because it can't be sustained. If you're a 3000-5000 or 25000 photog the $500 Brides are not going to contact you just like Wal-Mart shoppers don't shop at Neman Marcus. So for the most part I
...Show more

Yes we do.
I don't know if it's good to encourage $500 photogs to 'do the right thing' - learn, charge the proper amount,etc, or ignore them and let them fade away. I suppose in some ways it does not matter - most folks are not cut out for self employment so those that are wil be around and succeed regardless, and vice versa.

It looks like a fun, easy business to be in. "Hey, ive' got a camera and I'll can make $1000 on a saturday shooting a wedding!" . After a bit reality sets in, especially if one goes full time or has to pay their bills with the income from teh business.



Nov 30, 2008 at 06:04 PM
Italo Campilii
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #13 · $500 weddings


jcolman wrote:
Everyone who started in the wedding photography business and who charged $1500 or more on their first gig please raise their hands.


My fiancee'. She rocks! My first gig was $600 and then it almost quadrupled the second time. I rather have 10 weddings a year at $2k than 20 weddings at $1k.



Dec 01, 2008 at 06:04 AM
paulhodson
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #14 · $500 weddings


prof_fate wrote:
There are two reasons for low prices - your market or your confidence.

Shitty work should not be charged for - the "i'm not very good so it's only $500" is a crock of shit IMO. If you are that bad then don't charge at all. Hey, I suck at hair cuts but for $5 I'll give you one! Do you really want me to give you a haircut?


Yes - if you have the only pair of scissors and my hair is getting in my eyes!





Dec 01, 2008 at 06:08 AM
Milamug
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #15 · $500 weddings


prof_fate wrote:
Yes we do.
I don't know if it's good to encourage $500 photogs to 'do the right thing' - learn, charge the proper amount,etc, or ignore them and let them fade away.

Ignore them I would say, but DON"T expect them to fade away. Why would they, there's a market for them, obviously. Wal-mart aint gonna fade away and I'm sure Nerman Marcus doesn't give a sh!t! A $500 photog and a $2500+ one cater to 2 total different markets.



Dec 01, 2008 at 04:15 PM
rprouty
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #16 · $500 weddings


I say charge $500.00 for two hours give'm all the images on CD and say good by.




Dec 02, 2008 at 12:28 PM
prof_fate
Offline
• • • • •
[X]
p.3 #17 · $500 weddings


rprouty wrote:
I say charge $500.00 for two hours give'm all the images on CD and say good by.



There is something to be said for that, but here's what I have against it:

It sets a precedent that one can get a wedding photogrpher for $1000 (or 500, whatever - cheap is the idea).

It implies that prints are prints and editing isn't important - when you tell them to go to walgreens and you don't give edited images what else can it say?

it will kill your business. Business 101: It costs the same to bring in a customer whether they spend $500 or $5000, but at $500 you need to bring in 10 times as many of them. More effort and cost for the same return (total sales wise).

The profit is in the album and prints. I can do an album - layout and edit the images in about 3 to 4 hours (30 side book). The book runs around $350 and I get $1000 for it. $650 for 4 hours. Not a bad return, AND they've got something to show their friends and family that I know shows my work to it's best - great marketing for me!

Perhaps you think shooting a wedding takes 8 hours. Not so. It takes a meeting, prep, travel, shoot time, travel time, download and backup, and then burn a disk or upload to a website and probably a meeting or call after. 10 to 12 hours of time easy. For what, $1000? Thats $80 an hour, you had to get dressed up and bring $5000 or more in gear. I can do the album in my underwear and use a computer and software that runs under $2000.

Prints are also very profitable. An 8x10 costs me $1 and I sell it for $39 and some time to edit it.

It also depends on how much you love photography. Are you in it for just the money or are you in it for the art? A print, an album, a canvas - the final edited image that was my vision when I capture it, that is my art. That is what I want a client to have, to enjoy, to treasure for generations.



Dec 02, 2008 at 05:09 PM
1       2              end




FM Forums | Wedding Photographer | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account