perspective wrote:
Maybe not though because I have a pretty clever shoulder strap/clamp combination I use on my cameras that distributes the weight over a larger area than those horrible neck straps that one gets by default with these lenses and bodies.
BuLLets wrote:
Anyone with the lens finding it a little bit difficult attaching and removing the lens hood? It's a lot harder to do when compared with my 300 2.8.
It's easier than my former 300 f/2.8 IS. I think it just varies from copy to copy. They wear in, I wouldn't worry.
stanj wrote: perspective wroteMaybe not though because I have a pretty clever shoulder strap/clamp combination I use on my cameras that distributes the weight over a larger area than those horrible neck straps that one gets by default with these lenses and bodies.Which one, may I ask?
I use a arca-swiss clamp as the attachment device and attack that to QR plates on the bodies and lenses and I have a Lowepro 2" wide shoulder strap that attaches to both sides of the arca-swiss clamp. I got the clamp at Kirkphoto. They make a special one just for this application. It's meant as a device to carry around an extra, and large lens. I find it is the best solution for heavy body/lens solutions. Far superior to using a standard neck strap. I can detach it from the body in about a second and have a rig that is free of straps to use for my shots. I'll take a picture later and upload it.
Vow.. I want to shoot elephants where I work with in Thailand with this lens and camera.. I will try one day to own it.. The lens is super sharp..The price is too high..
Well Bullets.
Its obvious, you son may need som dental work, in the future. So in order to pay for that, just mail me the lens. Upon reciept of such, ill pay his complete dental visit, at Dr. Yankums, office. Just thought i would ad some humor to your post.
Cheers
Harry
This is what this lens is built for, low light shooting and the IS is really doing its job. Plus I have found that with the 2x extender, pictures come out very sharp as well.
BuLLets wrote:
perspective, those look great. What were the shutter speeds like?
Ah, 1/1000, 1/1/000 and 1/800. I was shooting 1/200-1/400 on Thursday with a 100-400 lens and the motion blur was terrible. For this sport 1/500 is about as low as you probably want to get. When it got really dark when I was shooting with the 200mm I was down in the 1/500 range at f/2 and it was getting tougher and I was at 1600 ISO. I haven't posted any of those shots yet. At the end I was lamenting the lack of ISO 3200 on the XSi and I didn't want to do the 1 stop underexposure trick.
This is what this lens is built for, low light shooting and the IS is really doing its job. Plus I have found that with the 2x extender, pictures come out very sharp as well.
Perry
It works amazing with the 2x in my opinion. The AF is still super fast with the 2x. In fact it's so good I can't remember thinking that it had slowed down. Usually when I put the 2x on a lens I get that moment or disorientation because the AF doesn't lock as fast as I'm expecting. With a 1.4x it is truly superb and I like the way the XSi body performed as well.
to, perspective
Those are some very nice shot, well done. I don't care how good the camera or lens is. it is still the man behind the machine that takes the shot.