wayne seltzer wrote:
Derek, is that your new McLaren?😁
dear lord no. i've still never even bought an actual new car. some kid (oof in the background on the first shot) has been driving it lately around the back roads i take home when traffic is bad.
an easter egg hunt shot from the same roll:
sadly, the exposure compensation button on the camera got bumped way up in my bag and it took me a while to notice, so many of the shots on the roll are suboptimal...
sebboh wrote:
dear lord no. i've still never even bought an actual new car. some kid (oof in the background on the first shot) has been driving it lately around the back roads i take home when traffic is bad.
sadly, the exposure compensation button on the camera got bumped way up in my bag and it took me a while to notice, so many of the shots on the roll are suboptimal...
Further proof exposure compensation dials are tools of the devil.
Also, kids today and their plastic eggs filled with candy or money. All we ever got out of an easter egg hunt were disgusting hard-boiled eggs.
freaklikeme wrote:
Further proof exposure compensation dials are tools of the devil.
Also, kids today and their plastic eggs filled with candy or money. All we ever got out of an easter egg hunt were disgusting hard-boiled eggs.
hey now, i like hard boiled eggs (though not as much as deviled eggs).
i still feel like exposure dials are a good thing, i just need to stop ignoring all that info in the viewfinder that isn't part of the picture. i blame digital cameras for making the cost of not paying attention too low.
