Post your recent film shots!
p.748 #1Post your recent film shots!
imagesfromobjects wrote:
On a related note - happened upon some well-expired Velvia at a flea market, figured what the heck, right?
Nobody in Philly does E6. Any recommendations for labs? East Coast a plus, not worried about scans, I'm looking forward to doing that myself. Affordable is good.
Also, anyone have experience with expired slide film want to recommend how I should rate it? It's 2002, I doubt it was ever refrigerated.
TIA
These guys are always highly rated, but unused by me since I never shoot E6.
http://www.agximaging.com
On a related note - happened upon some well-expired Velvia at a flea market, figured what the heck, right?
Nobody in Philly does E6. Any recommendations for labs? East Coast a plus, not worried about scans, I'm looking forward to doing that myself. Affordable is good.
Also, anyone have experience with expired slide film want to recommend how I should rate it? It's 2002, I doubt it was ever refrigerated.
TIA
These guys are always highly rated, but unused by me since I never shoot E6.
http://www.agximaging.com
Dec 30, 2018 at 11:47 AM
p.748 #2Post your recent film shots!
Hahaha! I'm sure it is (I did c41 in my sink for a year with good results) but I'm taking a break from home developing. I have no time for anything these days. It'll probably take 2 months just to shoot the roll. Aye. This one's getting sent out, no way around it.
Activatedfx wrote:
imagesfromobjects wrote
On a related note - happened upon some well-expired Velvia at a flea market, figured what the heck, right?Nobody in Philly does E6. Any recommendations for labs? East Coast a plus, not worried about scans, I'm looking forward to doing that myself. Affordable is good.
Also, anyone have experience with expired slide film want to recommend how I should rate it? It's 2002, I doubt it was ever refrigerated.
TIA
It's easier than you'd think!
Bleeker Digital in NYC is always recommended in other film forum threads. I got film developed and scanned there once, and it was great, but then I started doing it myself! http://bleekerdigital.com/services/film-processing/
Richard Photo Lab in CA is supposed to be one of the best there is. https://www.richardphotolab.com
Dec 30, 2018 at 12:27 PM
p.748 #3Post your recent film shots!
edwardkaraa wrote:
Awesome!
thank you Edward
Creative Edge wrote
pentax 6x7, 300mm f4, fuji velvia 50thank you Edward
Dec 30, 2018 at 05:50 PM
p.748 #4Post your recent film shots!
Happy new year everyone!
Hasselblad 500c, Zeiss 250/5.6 Sonnar Superachromat CF, Ilford Pan F in Rodinal 1:100 stand, flatbed scan
Dec 31, 2018 at 01:55 AM
p.748 #6Post your recent film shots!
andersd wrote:
Happy new year everyone!
https://adamsgaard.dk/files_nonpub/04-rebild-bakker.jpg
Hasselblad 500c, Zeiss 250/5.6 Sonnar Superachromat CF, Ilford Pan F in Rodinal 1:100 stand, flatbed scan
Beautiful. Anders - do you find stand developing gives a bit more contrast to your images? I have never tried it as I like to get things processed as quick as possible.
Happy new year everyone!
https://adamsgaard.dk/files_nonpub/04-rebild-bakker.jpg
Beautiful. Anders - do you find stand developing gives a bit more contrast to your images? I have never tried it as I like to get things processed as quick as possible.
Jan 01, 2019 at 09:53 PM
p.748 #7Post your recent film shots!
Creative Edge wrote:
pentax 6x7, 300mm f4, fuji velvia 50
Perfect!
pentax 6x7, 300mm f4, fuji velvia 50
Perfect!
Jan 01, 2019 at 09:55 PM
p.748 #8Post your recent film shots!
imagesfromobjects wrote:
Also, anyone have experience with expired slide film want to recommend how I should rate it? It's 2002, I doubt it was ever refrigerated.
TIA
I pretty much only shoot (well) expired slide film these days. 2002 expiry is actually not too bad, I would only add 1/2 stop or so to your exposure if anything at all. Of course, this is if the film was stored properly over the years. I shot some slide film recently which expired in the late 80's and didn't adjust at all. However, you will find that most people recommend one additional stop per 10yrs of expiry. If it is a scene you really like, I recommend bracketing a few extra...
Also, anyone have experience with expired slide film want to recommend how I should rate it? It's 2002, I doubt it was ever refrigerated.
TIA
I pretty much only shoot (well) expired slide film these days. 2002 expiry is actually not too bad, I would only add 1/2 stop or so to your exposure if anything at all. Of course, this is if the film was stored properly over the years. I shot some slide film recently which expired in the late 80's and didn't adjust at all. However, you will find that most people recommend one additional stop per 10yrs of expiry. If it is a scene you really like, I recommend bracketing a few extra...
Jan 01, 2019 at 09:58 PM
|
p.748 #12Post your recent film shots!
Gary Clennan wrote:
https://adamsgaard.dk/files_nonpub/04-rebild-bakker.jpg
Hasselblad 500c, Zeiss 250/5.6 Sonnar Superachromat CF, Ilford Pan F in Rodinal 1:100 stand, flatbed scan Beautiful. Anders - do you find stand developing gives a bit more contrast to your images? I have never tried it as I like to get things processed as quick as possible.
Thanks Gary, much appreciated! Truly beautiful work of yours on the previous page.
It was my first attempt with stand development. Unfortunately, the procedure caused slightly uneven development, as if the developer became stratified. However, this was easily fixed in post-processing. I am currently reading "The Film Developing Cookbook" by Anchell and Troop, which states that stand development enhances micro gradation for all films, and brightens shadows with older emulsions. I didn't A/B test against regular development, but that is on my to-do list.
andersd wrote
Happy new year everyone!https://adamsgaard.dk/files_nonpub/04-rebild-bakker.jpg
Thanks Gary, much appreciated! Truly beautiful work of yours on the previous page.
It was my first attempt with stand development. Unfortunately, the procedure caused slightly uneven development, as if the developer became stratified. However, this was easily fixed in post-processing. I am currently reading "The Film Developing Cookbook" by Anchell and Troop, which states that stand development enhances micro gradation for all films, and brightens shadows with older emulsions. I didn't A/B test against regular development, but that is on my to-do list.
Jan 02, 2019 at 10:35 AM
p.748 #13Post your recent film shots!
Creative Edge wrote:
Pentax 67, 75mm , shot on Velvia 50
Velvia 50 for portraits?! You rebel!
Pentax 67, 75mm , shot on Velvia 50
Velvia 50 for portraits?! You rebel!
Jan 02, 2019 at 01:41 PM
p.748 #14Post your recent film shots!
andersd wrote:
https://adamsgaard.dk/files_nonpub/04-rebild-bakker.jpg
Hasselblad 500c, Zeiss 250/5.6 Sonnar Superachromat CF, Ilford Pan F in Rodinal 1:100 stand, flatbed scan Beautiful. Anders - do you find stand developing gives a bit more contrast to your images? I have never tried it as I like to get things processed as quick as possible. Thanks Gary, much appreciated! Truly beautiful work of yours on the previous page.
It was my first attempt with stand development. Unfortunately, the procedure caused slightly uneven development, as if the developer became stratified. However, this was easily fixed in post-processing. I am currently reading "The Film Developing Cookbook" by Anchell and Troop, which states that stand development enhances micro gradation for all films, and brightens shadows with older emulsions. I didn't A/B test against regular development, but that is on my to-do list.
Thanks. I will have to try this out one day.
Gary Clennan wrote
andersd wrote
Happy new year everyone!https://adamsgaard.dk/files_nonpub/04-rebild-bakker.jpg
It was my first attempt with stand development. Unfortunately, the procedure caused slightly uneven development, as if the developer became stratified. However, this was easily fixed in post-processing. I am currently reading "The Film Developing Cookbook" by Anchell and Troop, which states that stand development enhances micro gradation for all films, and brightens shadows with older emulsions. I didn't A/B test against regular development, but that is on my to-do list.
Thanks. I will have to try this out one day.
Jan 02, 2019 at 01:42 PM
p.748 #16Post your recent film shots!
Gary Clennan wrote:
Velvia 50 for portraits?! You rebel!
ha..ha... I have always loved velvia for fashion type shoots... I know...too much contrast,,, crazy color palette...
but I love it...
Creative Edge wrote
Pentax 67, 75mm , shot on Velvia 50 ha..ha... I have always loved velvia for fashion type shoots... I know...too much contrast,,, crazy color palette...
but I love it...
Jan 02, 2019 at 06:37 PM
p.748 #17Post your recent film shots!
Creative Edge wrote:
Velvia 50 for portraits?! You rebel! ha..ha... I have always loved velvia for fashion type shoots... I know...too much contrast,,, crazy color palette...
but I love it...
It worked very well in your shot.
Gary Clennan wrote
Creative Edge wrote
Pentax 67, 75mm , shot on Velvia 50 but I love it...
It worked very well in your shot.
Jan 02, 2019 at 06:44 PM
p.748 #18Post your recent film shots!
Creative Edge wrote:
Velvia 50 for portraits?! You rebel! ha..ha... I have always loved velvia for fashion type shoots... I know...too much contrast,,, crazy color palette...
but I love it...
Well it's certainly punchy which fits perfect with your models!
Gary Clennan wrote
Creative Edge wrote
Pentax 67, 75mm , shot on Velvia 50 but I love it...
Well it's certainly punchy which fits perfect with your models!
Jan 02, 2019 at 08:36 PM
