a.RodriguezPix wrote:
ugh!
Freestyle Photographic Supplies
about a minute ago
Sad rumors confirmed by #FUJIFILM Tokyo today... #Provia400X and #Neopan400 are #discontinued.
rattymouse wrote:
This is beautiful! How did you scan?
Thanks! I just scanned with a V700. The colour is actually a bit off, because I forgot to add exposure compensation when doing close focusing but it still looked decent enough.
Posted this in the landscape forum, but want some film type critique
The light was flat/overcast, I was shooting 20+ yr FP4 &
I think it might have been 1/2 - 1 stop under.
I am still trying to get this LF routine down.
Had to be careful to keep the highlight details w/o going black on the shadows
when scanning so I suspect it was a bit compromised to start with
Shot with a Toyo 45A, Nikkor 150, 1/10, f32, some tilt.
Mescalamba wrote:
I always wonder why so many landscape photographers have habit of "nosing down", eg. always getting more foreground than sky. Just came to my mind.. .
Im glad Im not the only person who noticed how common this is.
I too have often wondered this, it seems to be a rather common practice, though I don't completely understand why? Is it to minimize a boring sky? What if you have an EPIC sky?
I'm looking forward to shooting more 35mm film again actually, I'm making a move back to a 1V body to utilize all my EF lenses.
Hmm, I'll try and answer my thinking. The rocky-beach is a interesting foreground, small "peppered" rocks rounded by millennial tides. That coupled with the ability to use tilt movements to get the DOF resulted in this comp. I have also taken photos with the main subject being the sea stacks & surf..
