madNbad wrote:
Check with Blue Moon Camera & Machine. They don't list ENC-2 processing but apparently they're able to handle it for C-41.
Hope you enjoyed the cherry blossoms. We have one in our front yard and it's spectacular.
I called them a bit ago and checked. I've had my other film done there, purchased film there and actually sold a 75 Lux through them several years ago. All very positive.
When I spoke with them regarding if they do actual ENC-2 processing or C-41 cross process, they were a bit touchy about it, citing that ECN-2 isn't really necessary and then gave a mini-lecture that shooters are interested in these exoctic stocks, but really they'll come back and shoot what's available after experimenting. I thought it was an overreach and dumb. Just wanted to know if they actually did ECN-2 processing lol. Not be told I would eventually straighten out with more experience or that my interests wasn't legit.
lifeandmylens wrote:
250D does well in C-41. I used to shoot it at box and do a slight pull, I think like 3:00, but just try it and see. It's a super versatile film.
I don't devo my own, but I have read that too! I read you get a slight increase in contrast and shadows can get a bit green but it's minor. Does that seem correct to you?
nehemiahphoto wrote:
I don't devo my own, but I have read that too! I read you get a slight increase in contrast and shadows can get a bit green but it's minor. Does that seem correct to you?
The biggest difference I saw was when using commercial scanners (Noritsu, Fujifilm, Pakon etc). They simply do not handle the different color base of vision films well. If the operator knows how to correct them, it's fine, but often times colors are wonky. Camera scanning for instance with NLP, colors look great.
Arca Swiss 4x5 + Zeiss 135 + Portra 160 (converted to bw due to terrible florescent lighting). Speaking of which, can someone recommend a bw film in 4x5 for me to try for situations like this?
Arca Swiss 4x5 + Zeiss 135 + Portra 160 (converted to bw due to terrible florescent lighting). Speaking of which, can someone recommend a bw film in 4x5 for me to try for situations like this?
Arca Swiss 4x5 + Zeiss 135 + Portra 160 (converted to bw due to terrible florescent lighting). Speaking of which, can someone recommend a bw film in 4x5 for me to try for situations like this?
The b&w conversion gives this an ethereal quality. Noice!
Desmolicious wrote:
1st pic is so good! Iso 400 film?
I’d still get the Reto Pano @$35 over the Snapic at $100 but I love these shots!
A, get both!
2, the Snapic is a real upgrade from the pano just in terms of the lens alone, ignoring the other little features.
Here are a few from the test roll I shot with Fuji 400. Also did a number of selfies with family, and that's where it really shines IMO. Arm's length, minimum focus setting, flash... Works nicely.
2, the Snapic is a real upgrade from the pano just in terms of the lens alone, ignoring the other little features.
Here are a few from the test roll I shot with Fuji 400. Also did a number of selfies with family, and that's where it really shines IMO. Arm's length, minimum focus setting, flash... Works nicely.
