Post your recent film shots!
p.1553 #1Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Fujica ST705
Industar 50-2 50mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54771729284_500730b367_b.jpgThese have a great look to them!
Thanks, I've been getting into M42 lenses lately and I'm really liking how my Industar 50-2 renders.
Here are a few more from the same roll.
Acros II
Fujica ST705
Industar 50-2 50mm f/3.5
OregonSun wrote
Acros IIFujica ST705
Industar 50-2 50mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54771729284_500730b367_b.jpg
Thanks, I've been getting into M42 lenses lately and I'm really liking how my Industar 50-2 renders.
Here are a few more from the same roll.
Acros II
Fujica ST705
Industar 50-2 50mm f/3.5
Sep 11, 2025 at 01:19 PM
p.1553 #2Post your recent film shots!
A funky basement. Chamonix 45f2 + 135/3.5 + E100
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
Sep 11, 2025 at 02:34 PM
p.1553 #3Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
A funky basement. Chamonix 45f2 + 135/3.5 + E100
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
I would maybe disagree with that statement. This is really cool!
A funky basement. Chamonix 45f2 + 135/3.5 + E100
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
I would maybe disagree with that statement. This is really cool!
Sep 11, 2025 at 03:41 PM
p.1553 #4Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Usually just multi field and -1 / -1.5 stop exposure comp
When I shoot on the street, I noticed even I was not in backlighting but some of the photos were underexpose.
I did try all 3 methods but seems the issue was still here.
zi464 wrote
My biggest problem is exposure methods, wondering which method you guys used the most for digital M.When I shoot on the street, I noticed even I was not in backlighting but some of the photos were underexpose.
I did try all 3 methods but seems the issue was still here.
Sep 11, 2025 at 03:46 PM
p.1553 #5Post your recent film shots!
Sep 11, 2025 at 03:55 PM
p.1553 #6Post your recent film shots!
zi464 wrote:
Usually just multi field and -1 / -1.5 stop exposure compWhen I shoot on the street, I noticed even I was not in backlighting but some of the photos were underexpose.
I did try all 3 methods but seems the issue was still here.
Are you shooting manual or aperture priority? Generally digital M's can recover quite a bit of detail in the shadows, but zero in the highlights. Opposite of color negative film.
lifeandmylens wrote
zi464 wrote
My biggest problem is exposure methods, wondering which method you guys used the most for digital M.I did try all 3 methods but seems the issue was still here.
Are you shooting manual or aperture priority? Generally digital M's can recover quite a bit of detail in the shadows, but zero in the highlights. Opposite of color negative film.
Sep 11, 2025 at 04:59 PM
p.1553 #7Post your recent film shots!
skylight1b wrote:
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)I would maybe disagree with that statement. This is really cool!
It was in Better Homes and Gardens back in the 60's! Remains mostly unchanged.
lifeandmylens wrote
A funky basement. Chamonix 45f2 + 135/3.5 + E100(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
It was in Better Homes and Gardens back in the 60's! Remains mostly unchanged.
Sep 11, 2025 at 05:00 PM
p.1553 #8Post your recent film shots!
Good Evening,
Castle Hill Lighthouse (automated-active) in Newport, RI. Shot with Zone VI 4x5, Fujinon 240mm A f9 APO, on Arista 100, souped in Legacy 110.
Regards,
Edd
Castle Hill Lighthouse (automated-active) in Newport, RI. Shot with Zone VI 4x5, Fujinon 240mm A f9 APO, on Arista 100, souped in Legacy 110.
Regards,
Edd
PerfectionV850
Sep 11, 2025 at 07:20 PM
p.1553 #9Post your recent film shots!
Tina Kino wrote:
https://cdn.assets.lomography.com/fa/cadfcfd7ace86aaf56703c6d51c89c418b2a52/705x1023x2.jpg
Pentax Espio Mini / Kentmere Pan 200
I don’t see a photo…
https://cdn.assets.lomography.com/fa/cadfcfd7ace86aaf56703c6d51c89c418b2a52/705x1023x2.jpg
Pentax Espio Mini / Kentmere Pan 200
I don’t see a photo…
Sep 11, 2025 at 10:18 PM
p.1553 #10Post your recent film shots!
@Desmolicious - I don't know what's up with that, I can't see it on my iPhone either, but can see it on my mac 🤷♂️
Sep 11, 2025 at 11:25 PM
|
p.1553 #11Post your recent film shots!
Peace of Mind v7, The Zephyrs, Zephyr Boulder, Lake Tahoe.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2024.12.30 Roll #371-09110-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2024.12.30 Roll #371-09110-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Sep 12, 2025 at 01:00 AM
p.1553 #12Post your recent film shots!
Hasselblad SuperWide / XP2 / Diafine
Closed for the Season. by Henry Beckmeyer, on Flickr
Closed for the Season. by Henry Beckmeyer, on FlickrSep 12, 2025 at 08:14 AM
p.1553 #13Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Usually just multi field and -1 / -1.5 stop exposure compWhen I shoot on the street, I noticed even I was not in backlighting but some of the photos were underexpose.
I did try all 3 methods but seems the issue was still here.Are you shooting manual or aperture priority? Generally digital M's can recover quite a bit of detail in the shadows, but zero in the highlights. Opposite of color negative film.
Manual but with auto ISO.
Yea, the shadows and subject were able to recover for most of the photos.
zi464 wrote
lifeandmylens wrote
zi464 wrote
My biggest problem is exposure methods, wondering which method you guys used the most for digital M.I did try all 3 methods but seems the issue was still here.
Manual but with auto ISO.
Yea, the shadows and subject were able to recover for most of the photos.
Sep 12, 2025 at 09:04 AM
p.1553 #14Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
A funky basement. Chamonix 45f2 + 135/3.5 + E100
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
I love how you manage to always get a cinematic feel to your photos, I should work on that more.
A funky basement. Chamonix 45f2 + 135/3.5 + E100
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
I love how you manage to always get a cinematic feel to your photos, I should work on that more.
Sep 12, 2025 at 09:10 AM
p.1553 #15Post your recent film shots!
Sonnar-7 wrote:
(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)I love how you manage to always get a cinematic feel to your photos, I should work on that more.
Thanks, I'm guessing it mostly just the subject matter.
lifeandmylens wrote
A funky basement. Chamonix 45f2 + 135/3.5 + E100(been shooting things that don't really belong on LF for practice)
Thanks, I'm guessing it mostly just the subject matter.
Sep 12, 2025 at 10:58 AM
p.1553 #16Post your recent film shots!
Not a film shot, but a shot of my film scanners. Just got this old iMac G5 for $50 to run Nikon Scan natively instead of on a Mac laptop running windows via bootcamp. She's 20 years old and looks great!
Sep 12, 2025 at 11:00 AM
p.1553 #17Post your recent film shots!
I wish Nikon, or someone, would make new scanners...
Sep 12, 2025 at 11:11 AM
p.1553 #18Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Not a film shot, but a shot of my film scanners. Just got this old iMac G5 for $50 to run Nikon Scan natively instead of on a Mac laptop running windows via bootcamp. She's 20 years old and looks great!
Is 8000 or 9000, how much it cost you ?
Not a film shot, but a shot of my film scanners. Just got this old iMac G5 for $50 to run Nikon Scan natively instead of on a Mac laptop running windows via bootcamp. She's 20 years old and looks great!
Is 8000 or 9000, how much it cost you ?
Sep 12, 2025 at 11:17 AM
p.1553 #20Post your recent film shots!
zi464 wrote:
Is 8000 or 9000, how much it cost you ?
The one on the right is a 9000. I think it was around $1800 a year or two ago.
lifeandmylens wrote
Not a film shot, but a shot of my film scanners. Just got this old iMac G5 for $50 to run Nikon Scan natively instead of on a Mac laptop running windows via bootcamp. She's 20 years old and looks great!The one on the right is a 9000. I think it was around $1800 a year or two ago.
Sep 12, 2025 at 11:37 AM