Post your recent film shots!
p.1512 #1Post your recent film shots!
_jim_ wrote:
Awesome shots - how have you rated the 5222?Thanks Ineound. Well, _jim_ was the first person I saw using 5222 XX and he suggested shooting the rated 250 ISO @ 1/3 of a stop overexposure - and what sounded like aggressive agitation _IMO. I shot at rated ISO, extended my development time, and agitated gently and less frequently.
JimWhen using 5222, do you have any issues with light piping? I find that that usually have small light leaks through the sprocket holes for the first two-ish frames of every roll. I don't have this problem with other bulk rolled stocks.
Jim,
I don't have that with my roll (only shot one so far). The base is really clear - almost as clear as Technical Pan, or Pantomic-X use to be - even around all the sprocket holes. I since purchased more 35mm from the same place, and 120 from Cinestill - which seems to be the only source in the US.
Jim
James Markus wrote
Ineound wrote
James Markus wrote
More of the 5222 XX and the N90sJim
Jim,
I don't have that with my roll (only shot one so far). The base is really clear - almost as clear as Technical Pan, or Pantomic-X use to be - even around all the sprocket holes. I since purchased more 35mm from the same place, and 120 from Cinestill - which seems to be the only source in the US.
Jim
Jun 19, 2025 at 09:57 AM
p.1512 #2Post your recent film shots!
At Vito & Nick's - one of the contenders for the (imaginary) title: "Birthplace of the Tavern-Style Pizza." Very fun, old-school atmosphere. Wonderful pizza. Also a good reminder of how geographically large big cities are (I get spoiled by little old Portland) - Vito & Nick's was a two hour train/bus ride from where I was staying (closer to downtown)...and is still in a Chicago ZIP code.
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Vito & Nick's by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Pizza by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Leica 35mm f/1.4 ASPH 11874, Eastman-5222, Xtol 1:1.
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on FlickrVito & Nick's by Jim Fischer, on FlickrPizza by Jim Fischer, on FlickrLeica M7, Leica 35mm f/1.4 ASPH 11874, Eastman-5222, Xtol 1:1.
Jun 19, 2025 at 11:29 AM
p.1512 #3Post your recent film shots!
James Markus wrote:
I don't have that with my roll (only shot one so far). The base is really clear - almost as clear as Technical Pan, or Pantomic-X use to be - even around all the sprocket holes. I since purchased more 35mm from the same place, and 120 from Cinestill - which seems to be the only source in the US.
One word of warning on the Cinestill 120 version of this film: if you are using it on a camera that has a red window on the back (to see the frame numbers), the numbers on CInestill's backing paper are so faintly printed that they are impossible to read through the red window. It's best to use that film on a camera that spaces its frames automatically, like my Mamiya C330.
I don't have that with my roll (only shot one so far). The base is really clear - almost as clear as Technical Pan, or Pantomic-X use to be - even around all the sprocket holes. I since purchased more 35mm from the same place, and 120 from Cinestill - which seems to be the only source in the US.
One word of warning on the Cinestill 120 version of this film: if you are using it on a camera that has a red window on the back (to see the frame numbers), the numbers on CInestill's backing paper are so faintly printed that they are impossible to read through the red window. It's best to use that film on a camera that spaces its frames automatically, like my Mamiya C330.
Jun 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM
p.1512 #4Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
One word of warning on the Cinestill 120 version of this film: if you are using it on a camera that has a red window on the back (to see the frame numbers), the numbers on CInestill's backing paper are so faintly printed that they are impossible to read through the red window. It's best to use that film on a camera that spaces its frames automatically, like my Mamiya C330.
Thanks, I ran into that problem in January. Fortunately, all my medium format cameras (folding cameras, and TLRs both) have auto spacing - except for the first frame on some. I solved one Agfa copies this way - may be humorous to you.
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1886609/0?keyword=x#16723980
BTW - I looked at the Mamiya C330, C220, 645, 67 etc. The build quality looks amazing, and I am afraid of the damage it could do to my wallet, besides, I like fixing broken cameras. Current addiction is the Pentax 645 - what a great 1980s camera.
James Markus wrote
I don't have that with my roll (only shot one so far). The base is really clear - almost as clear as Technical Pan, or Pantomic-X use to be - even around all the sprocket holes. I since purchased more 35mm from the same place, and 120 from Cinestill - which seems to be the only source in the US.Thanks, I ran into that problem in January. Fortunately, all my medium format cameras (folding cameras, and TLRs both) have auto spacing - except for the first frame on some. I solved one Agfa copies this way - may be humorous to you.
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1886609/0?keyword=x#16723980
BTW - I looked at the Mamiya C330, C220, 645, 67 etc. The build quality looks amazing, and I am afraid of the damage it could do to my wallet, besides, I like fixing broken cameras. Current addiction is the Pentax 645 - what a great 1980s camera.
Jun 19, 2025 at 01:59 PM
p.1512 #5Post your recent film shots!
Couple more rescued frames from the new to me Pentax 645 and the 30+ year old Kodak Verichrome Pan film. I hadn't dissembled and cleaned the lenses yet - so I hope the fresh roll of Kentmere 100 & clean glass will let the camera shine like I suspect it can. For now, more garbage shots
The dirtiest lens - 150mm f3.5 - A simple 4 elements in 4 groups design
The dirtiest lens - 150mm f3.5 - A simple 4 elements in 4 groups design
The dirtiest lens - 150mm f3.5 - A simple 4 elements in 4 groups design
The dirtiest lens - 150mm f3.5 - A simple 4 elements in 4 groups design
Jun 19, 2025 at 02:15 PM
p.1512 #6Post your recent film shots!
James Markus wrote:
BTW - I looked at the Mamiya C330, C220, 645, 67 etc. The build quality looks amazing, and I am afraid of the damage it could do to my wallet, besides, I like fixing broken cameras. Current addiction is the Pentax 645 - what a great 1980s camera.
I like my C330 a lot, although the images tend to be a bit too clean and perfect; I'd love an old Rolleiflex for more character but can't afford it. I dd a portrait shoot recently with the C330 and when my subject posted the photos on her Instagram and Facebook she didn't mention they were shot on film. I'm sure everyone thought they were from a digital camera.
BTW - I looked at the Mamiya C330, C220, 645, 67 etc. The build quality looks amazing, and I am afraid of the damage it could do to my wallet, besides, I like fixing broken cameras. Current addiction is the Pentax 645 - what a great 1980s camera.
I like my C330 a lot, although the images tend to be a bit too clean and perfect; I'd love an old Rolleiflex for more character but can't afford it. I dd a portrait shoot recently with the C330 and when my subject posted the photos on her Instagram and Facebook she didn't mention they were shot on film. I'm sure everyone thought they were from a digital camera.
Jun 19, 2025 at 03:28 PM
p.1512 #7Post your recent film shots!
Gas Mo
Canon EOS3, 24-70mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold 200
Canon EOS3, 24-70mm f/2.8, Kodak Gold 200
Jun 20, 2025 at 06:48 AM
p.1512 #8Post your recent film shots!
Caught up with some film scanning.
Starting with some B&W. I've recently been trying to include people more often in my images - not that easy to do if you still want clean compositions (surprise!
)
These first two are from a test roll (Kentmere 400) in my ex gf's old Minolta Riva Zoom 70. Missed focus on both, but the lens on that camera is not exactly sharp anyway except at 35mm dead-center.
Munich x Kentmere 400 by Felix, auf Flickr
Munich x Kentmere 400 by Felix, auf Flickr
These ones are on HP5+, taken with the Nikon F65 and 28-105mm f3.5-4.5.
Königsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf Flickr
Königsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf Flickr
Königsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf Flickr
Königsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf Flickr
Bonus cat pic! (with the Nikkor 50mm 1.4)
Teo x HP5+ by Felix, auf Flickr
Starting with some B&W. I've recently been trying to include people more often in my images - not that easy to do if you still want clean compositions (surprise!
)These first two are from a test roll (Kentmere 400) in my ex gf's old Minolta Riva Zoom 70. Missed focus on both, but the lens on that camera is not exactly sharp anyway except at 35mm dead-center.
Munich x Kentmere 400 by Felix, auf FlickrMunich x Kentmere 400 by Felix, auf FlickrThese ones are on HP5+, taken with the Nikon F65 and 28-105mm f3.5-4.5.
Königsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf FlickrKönigsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf FlickrKönigsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf FlickrKönigsplatz x HP5+ by Felix, auf FlickrBonus cat pic! (with the Nikkor 50mm 1.4)
Teo x HP5+ by Felix, auf FlickrJun 21, 2025 at 03:29 AM
p.1512 #9Post your recent film shots!
Back to color and landscapes without people
Nikon F65, Gold 200, AF 35mm f2D and 50mm f1.4D
Jochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
Jochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
Jochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
Jochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
Jochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
Nikon F65, Gold 200, AF 35mm f2D and 50mm f1.4D
Jochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf FlickrJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf FlickrJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf FlickrJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf FlickrJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf FlickrJun 21, 2025 at 03:32 AM
p.1512 #10Post your recent film shots!
Very nice @fjablo, the landscape has a very similar look to my neck of the woods.
Minolta XD, Rokkor 58/1.2 on expired Copex Rapid 50, pushed a stop
Minolta XD, Rokkor 58/1.2 on expired Copex Rapid 50, pushed a stop
Jun 21, 2025 at 10:57 AM
|
p.1512 #11Post your recent film shots!
fjablo wrote:
Back to color and landscapes without people
Nikon F65, Gold 200, AF 35mm f2D and 50mm f1.4D
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603851294_129e3d5818_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54602782422_b77375d8bf_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603961880_a7eb71fd4b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659851_cf3bc78d67_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659861_89cc3e8a7b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
Lovely pics and would not have been any better if you used a $$$$F6 instead of your F65.
This is why these now very affordable AF slr film cameras are the best deal in film photography.
Back to color and landscapes without people
Nikon F65, Gold 200, AF 35mm f2D and 50mm f1.4D
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603851294_129e3d5818_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54602782422_b77375d8bf_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603961880_a7eb71fd4b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659851_cf3bc78d67_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659861_89cc3e8a7b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
Lovely pics and would not have been any better if you used a $$$$F6 instead of your F65.
This is why these now very affordable AF slr film cameras are the best deal in film photography.
Jun 21, 2025 at 12:46 PM
p.1512 #12Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Nikon F65, Gold 200, AF 35mm f2D and 50mm f1.4D
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603851294_129e3d5818_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54602782422_b77375d8bf_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603961880_a7eb71fd4b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659851_cf3bc78d67_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659861_89cc3e8a7b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf FlickrLovely pics and would not have been any better if you used a $$$$F6 instead of your F65.
This is why these now very affordable AF slr film cameras are the best deal in film photography.
Yep and it also weighs absolutely nothing. The Canon 3000N with the 40mm f2.8 is also really nice for the mountains, I think the whole package weighs approx 500g?
fjablo wrote
Back to color and landscapes without people Nikon F65, Gold 200, AF 35mm f2D and 50mm f1.4D
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603851294_129e3d5818_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54602782422_b77375d8bf_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603961880_a7eb71fd4b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659851_cf3bc78d67_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54603659861_89cc3e8a7b_b.jpgJochberg x Gold 200 by Felix, auf Flickr
This is why these now very affordable AF slr film cameras are the best deal in film photography.
Yep and it also weighs absolutely nothing. The Canon 3000N with the 40mm f2.8 is also really nice for the mountains, I think the whole package weighs approx 500g?
Jun 21, 2025 at 03:28 PM
p.1512 #13Post your recent film shots!
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Smile by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Chris Weeks by Jim Fischer, on FlickrLeica M7, Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH 11874, Flic Film Aurora 400.
Jun 21, 2025 at 04:49 PM
p.1512 #14Post your recent film shots!
_jim_ wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54598434710_8714af0041_b.jpgSmile by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH 11874, Flic Film Aurora 400.
Foosbollards
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54598434710_8714af0041_b.jpgSmile by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Leica 35mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH 11874, Flic Film Aurora 400.
Foosbollards
Jun 21, 2025 at 08:09 PM
p.1512 #15Post your recent film shots!
Recently, this huge moth (Antheraea Polyphemus - about 7 inches wide) was waiting on my door jam as I went to get the mail. According to the web they are related to silk moths, and eat 86,000 times their weight as caterpillars. They coast on reserves as a moth, and have a non-functioning mouth. I never touched her, but coaxed her into a Corningware baking dish with no corners, and "vanishing wall" edges. Problem was she filled the 9"x9" dish. I delayed her for only an hour, and she seemed rather lethargic the whole time. After resting on the porch a few minutes she flew off. I recorded it with my digital camera, but had the Pentax 645 set up on a very low homemade desktop support. I was adapting the Nikon 6T - an achromatic doublet close up lens to one of the two Pentax lenses I have. Either the 55mm or the 150mm. Here is the result using Kentmere 100. Oh, and the Pentax 645 metering and exposure are spot on - my medium format technic needs work.
Jun 21, 2025 at 08:52 PM
p.1512 #16Post your recent film shots!
Pentax 67-II, SMC Pentax 6x7 55mm F4, SMC Takumar 105mm F2.4, Pentax SMC 200mm F4
Ilford HP+ 400@D76
Кисловодск 2019 Pentax67 4 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on Flickr
Кисловодск 2019 Pentax67 6 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on Flickr
Кисловодск 2019 Pentax67 20 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on Flickr
Кисловодск 2019 Pentax67 3 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on Flickr
(actually I shot it couple of years ago but scanned just yesterday)
Ilford HP+ 400@D76
Кисловодск 2019 Pentax67 4 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on FlickrКисловодск 2019 Pentax67 6 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on FlickrКисловодск 2019 Pentax67 20 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on FlickrКисловодск 2019 Pentax67 3 by Nikolai Vassiliev, on Flickr(actually I shot it couple of years ago but scanned just yesterday)
Jun 22, 2025 at 10:29 AM
p.1512 #17Post your recent film shots!
Roll 181: Tech Pan in Rodinal (5 mL + 900 mL = 1 + 180). I had done a previous test roll in 10 mL + 950 mL = 1 + 95, which gave ISO12 but a very high contrast, so I was hoping I could tame the contrast by using less developer. Unfortunately both contrast AND ISO crashed pretty hard. I'll do a roll with actual subjects next using 1+95 to see how troublesome the contrast actually is. If it's an actual issue, perhaps I'll do a test roll using 1+95 but at 7 minutes rather than 10 minutes. I am not sure if these data confirm that a roll of 120 needs >5 mL of Rodinal (a guideline I have been following ever since switching to Rodinal).
Jun 22, 2025 at 03:56 PM
p.1512 #18Post your recent film shots!
A reject frame from the Yashica Electro 35 GT. I missed the focus, but it still kinda works. Kentmere 400 shot at 200 iso.
Title: Waiting for Mommy"
Title: Waiting for Mommy"
Jun 22, 2025 at 04:00 PM
p.1512 #19Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
Roll 181: Tech Pan in Rodinal (5 mL + 900 mL = 1 + 180). I had done a previous test roll in 10 mL + 950 mL = 1 + 95, which gave ISO12 but a very high contrast, so I was hoping I could tame the contrast by using less developer. Unfortunately both contrast AND ISO crashed pretty hard. I'll do a roll with actual subjects next using 1+95 to see how troublesome the contrast actually is. If it's an actual issue, perhaps I'll do a test roll using 1+95 but at 7 minutes rather than 10 minutes....Show more →
Many years back, the rule was one sheet of 8X10 had the same amount of emulsion as two sheets of 4X5, one roll of 120 or one roll of 135. So the 5ml minimum for 135 should be the same for one roll of 120. Maybe 7.5ml will give you the right results?
Jun 22, 2025 at 04:09 PM
