fredmiranda.com Login

Post your recent film shots!

  
 
Keahi08
Offline
Details
p.1411 #1Post your recent film shots!
A bunch of shots on expired Fuji NPS 160. It took weeks to flatten out the negatives. I'm not sure which part of funky colors are down the age or my chemicals. Mamiya 645 Super.














Jan 19, 2025 at 01:34 PM
jay w
Offline
Details
p.1411 #2Post your recent film shots!
Tmax 100 (shot at 50), expiration 05, 2007, D-23 (no benzo), Nikon FE.






50mm 1.4






35mm 2.0






50mm 1.4

Lenses from memory.
Jan 19, 2025 at 03:49 PM
theHUN
Online
Details
p.1411 #3Post your recent film shots!
Roll 171: HP5+ in Rodinal 1+60, 20 minutes with continuous agitation in a Simma Sine Wave roller. I get ISO400 as I had hoped. Another roll with actual subjects was exposed earlier today with my new to me Isolette II, and I should have it developed next weekend.









Jan 19, 2025 at 06:37 PM
madNbad
Offline
Details
p.1411 #4Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
Roll 171: HP5+ in Rodinal 1+60, 20 minutes with continuous agitation in a Simma Sine Wave roller. I get ISO400 as I had hoped. Another roll with actual subjects was exposed earlier today with my new to me Isolette II, and I should have it developed next weekend.



Box speed with Rodinal! Is it the dilution or the continuous that makes the difference? I have a roll of TMax 100 in the M4-2 at the moment and was planning on exposing it at ISO 50 and using Rodinal but would like to use it at box speed.
Jan 19, 2025 at 07:01 PM
OregonSun
Offline
Details
p.1411 #5Post your recent film shots!
T-Max 100
Agfa Click pinhole conversion
40mm f/200










Jan 19, 2025 at 07:07 PM
theHUN
Online
Details
p.1411 #6Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
theHUN wroteRoll 171: HP5+ in Rodinal 1+60, 20 minutes with continuous agitation in a Simma Sine Wave roller. I get ISO400 as I had hoped. Another roll with actual subjects was exposed earlier today with my new to me Isolette II, and I should have it developed next weekend.
Box speed with Rodinal! Is it the dilution or the continuous that makes the difference? I have a roll of TMax 100 in the M4-2 at the moment and was planning on exposing it at ISO 50 and using Rodinal but would like to use it at box speed.


I don't know for sure. I have gotten box speed for HP5 with "regular" developing (4 inversions at the start of every minute) at the same dilution. But "regular" developing only gives me half box speed for Acros, FP4, Delta 100, and Delta 400. So for the moment I would say that HP5 is the odd one out. Why? *shrugs*
Jan 19, 2025 at 07:33 PM
theHUN
Online
Details
p.1411 #8Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
T-Max 100
Agfa Click pinhole conversion
40mm f/200

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54267191321_93c449dc48_c.jpg

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54266303657_2b9b8f0996_c.jpg



Have you noticed an unwanted/unpleasant effects from the curved film plane? I have an Ondu pinhole and the vignetting at 6x12 is quite severe, so I have experimented with center filters, but there are a bunch of other distortions that the center filter will not fix, so I am super curious about a curved film plane pinhole camera.
Jan 19, 2025 at 07:37 PM
madNbad
Offline
Details
p.1411 #9Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
madNbad wrote
theHUN wroteRoll 171: HP5+ in Rodinal 1+60, 20 minutes with continuous agitation in a Simma Sine Wave roller. I get ISO400 as I had hoped. Another roll with actual subjects was exposed earlier today with my new to me Isolette II, and I should have it developed next weekend.
Box speed with Rodinal! Is it the dilution or the continuous that makes the difference? I have a roll of TMax 100 in the M4-2 at the moment and was planning on exposing it at ISO 50 and using Rodinal but would like to use it at box speed.
I don't know for sure. I have gotten box speed for HP5 with "regular" developing (4 inversions at the start of every minute) at the same dilution. But "regular" developing only gives me half box speed for Acros, FP4, Delta 100, and Delta 400. So for the moment I would say that HP5 is the odd one out. Why? *shrugs*


Thanks. I'll wait until there's HP5 in the camera.
Jan 19, 2025 at 07:49 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

rji2goleez
Offline
Details
p.1411 #11Post your recent film shots!
Went to a local camera meetup group today. At the same place there was a small 'goth market'

Fuji GW690 III + Kentmere 400 (pushed 2 stops) + D76

















Edited on Jan 19, 2025 at 08:52 PM · View previous versions
Jan 19, 2025 at 08:47 PM
jay w
Offline
Details
p.1411 #12Post your recent film shots!
the Hun, Are you using a step wedge? I don't recognize the format if you're exposing in camera.
Jan 19, 2025 at 08:50 PM
bjhurley
Offline
Details
p.1411 #13Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
Have you noticed an unwanted/unpleasant effects from the curved film plane? I have an Ondu pinhole and the vignetting at 6x12 is quite severe, so I have experimented with center filters, but there are a bunch of other distortions that the center filter will not fix, so I am super curious about a curved film plane pinhole camera.


The wider Reality So Subtle pinhole cameras use a curved film plane; check out their 6x12 and 6x17 models, which were recently redesigned for easier loading.
Jan 20, 2025 at 05:43 AM
rji2goleez
Offline
Details
p.1411 #14Post your recent film shots!
Fuji GW690 III
Kentmere 400 (Pushed +2)
D-76









Jan 20, 2025 at 06:15 AM
OregonSun
Offline
Details
p.1411 #15Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
OregonSun wroteT-Max 100
Agfa Click pinhole conversion
40mm f/200

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54267191321_93c449dc48_c.jpg

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54266303657_2b9b8f0996_c.jpg
Have you noticed an unwanted/unpleasant effects from the curved film plane? I have an Ondu pinhole and the vignetting at 6x12 is quite severe, so I have experimented with center filters, but there are a bunch of other distortions that the center filter will not fix, so I am super curious about a curved film plane pinhole camera.


The curved film plane affects horizontal lines, making them more curved the farther they are from the center. I don't find the effect too objectionable on 6x6, I might on the wider pano formats though.

This frame is a good example, in reality all the horizontal lines in this are parallel. You can see some slight curvature closer to the center, while the handrail at the bottom displays even more.



Jan 20, 2025 at 07:50 AM
theHUN
Online
Details
p.1411 #16Post your recent film shots!
jay w wrote:
the Hun, Are you using a step wedge? I don't recognize the format if you're exposing in camera.


I am using a 16S back for my Hasselblad which shoots ~40x40 mm squares. I had bought the back thinking that 16 = 645, without realizing that 16S is only 40x40. Fortunately, I only use this back for film curve tests, so 40x40 is fine.

Edited on Jan 20, 2025 at 09:12 AM · View previous versions
Jan 20, 2025 at 08:48 AM
lifeandmylens
Offline
Details
p.1411 #17Post your recent film shots!
Pair of F3's with fun finders. F6 + 500T




Jan 20, 2025 at 08:52 AM
lifeandmylens
Offline
Details
p.1411 #18Post your recent film shots!
Little dude's haircut. FM3a + 58 1.2 + 200T

Ok I don't need to shoot at f/1.2 all the time







































Jan 20, 2025 at 10:16 AM
rji2goleez
Offline
Details
p.1411 #19Post your recent film shots!
Great images, poor little guy. I get to take my grandson to the dentist tomorrow . . . that should be fun.
Jan 20, 2025 at 10:31 AM
rji2goleez
Offline
Details
p.1411 #20Post your recent film shots!
A few more from yesterday's meetups. These from the next roll.

Fuji GW690 III
Kentmere 400 (pushed +2)
D-76















Jan 20, 2025 at 10:34 AM


FM ForumsFilm Is Not Dead ForumJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister