Tina Kino wrote:
To be frank I'm having problems wrapping my head around the fact you're shooting that Holga when you do own a perfectly fine Rollei - but great pics none the less, made me smile, thank you
God I wish I'd be able to frolic around outside with just a t-shirt right now!
I find the images from the Holga far more interesting. The Rolleiflex just gives perfect images.
Also hiking in a dusty environment with a lightweight $25 camera is far more enjoyable than with a delicate $5000 camera.
Desmolicious wrote:
I find the images from the Holga far more interesting. The Rolleiflex just gives perfect images.
Also hiking in a dusty environment with a lightweight $25 camera is far more enjoyable than with a delicate $5000 camera.
Ross Martin wrote:
Fuji Velvia 4 x 5 transparency scan including edges and developing clip marks of the sheet film just for fun. No Lightroom work other than a small increase in exposure and contrast plus sharpening (the drum scans arrive a little flat and dull). The color cast is a result of being lit by a blue sky in shade. The scene is monkeyflowers in the Paradise River high on the flank of Mount Rainier, WA.
Desmolicious wrote:
I recently ran into some 20 somethings who were using the same sort of camera. They asked me if I could take a pic of them w it, and in return I handed the girl my camera and asked the same.
It’s amusing that they consider 1MP cameras from the 2000s as super vintage. I find them quite poor due to the significant color noise and jpg artifacts, making the images look overly digital. Completely opposite from film.
