Haha! A rare case where 35mm Phoenix might have shown to be appropriate. That all neighborhood is covered in tags(is it the right word?), I need to go back to take more pictures, it’s quite a nice one though, that is strange but kinda beautiful.
Sonnar-7 wrote:
Haha! A rare case where 35mm Phoenix might have shown to be appropriate. That all neighborhood is covered in tags(is it the right word?), I need to go back to take more pictures, it’s quite a nice one though, that is strange but kinda beautiful.
With the yellow cast, it reminds me of a piece of Impressionist art. Maybe not a portrait film but it adds a dimension to the scene.
madNbad wrote:
With the yellow cast, it reminds me of a piece of Impressionist art. Maybe not a portrait film but it adds a dimension to the scene.
There is something to it and I’m aware that I’m a bit harsh toward the emultion but I’m annoyed in some regards for the few films I’ve done with it in 35mm, for portraits it has been disastrous indeed, in low light quite bad too, it lacks seriously in details and I’m not a sharpness freak. I still think there might be something onto that film, and even though I’m not quite happy with it I give credits to Harman for the ambitious endeavour.
In 120mm it is indeed another story, for now I will pause my experiments with it in 35mm and will go back to it later looking at how it evolves by watching others testing it.
How/who is scanning the film? It looks like they do not have the profiles correctly set up because my Phoenix in 35mm does not look like that! Harman actually did send out a technical bulletin telling labs that their standard existing profiles would not be ideal.
A rare case where 35mm Phoenix might have shown to be appropriate. That all neighborhood is covered in tags(is it the right word?), I need to go back to take more pictures, it’s quite a nice one though, that is strange but kinda beautiful.
