_jim_ wrote:
I tried using the roll analysis function in NLP today (for the first time ever). I think it helped...a bit. Still not 100% satisfied with how it converts color images...(I realize this is operator error...need to learn how to improve).
Here's a bit of Harman Phoenix 200, Canon EOS 300 (Rebel 2000) with the 50/2.5 macro (I think...could be the 40STM). It is...nice but I think I'll wait for the next iteration before I buy it again.
panos.v wrote:
Here's a bit of Harman Phoenix 200, Canon EOS 300 (Rebel 2000) with the 50/2.5 macro (I think...could be the 40STM). It is...nice but I think I'll wait for the next iteration before I buy it again.
If I had the wherewithal, I'd buy a tonne of this original release Phoenix and store it in a freezer. The coming iterations are going to turn it into a 'normal' film. This OG's unique high contrast/high saturation would be great for specific uses - inner city portraits/model shoots etc.
helimat wrote:
Working on my Sunny 16. Leica IIIb + Summar 50 + Tmax 400
To anyone out there who has never shot Tmax 400: I am embarrassed to admit that I just now shot my first roll of this film stock, and I was shocked by how flat* it was after it had dried.
*Edit: Flat as in no curl. It has plenty of contrast.
theHUN wrote:
To anyone out there who has never shot Tmax 400: I am embarrassed to admit that I just now shot my first roll of this film stock, and I was shocked by how flat it was after it had dried.
As in lack of contrast? Or just not annoyingly curly like other film stocks
helimat wrote:
As in lack of contrast? Or just not annoyingly curly like other film stocks
Sorry, I meant curl. It is more contrasty than Delta 400 for the same developing process (Rodinal, 1+60, 20 min). I'll post the curves once I have developed HP5 and Tri-X for the same recipe.
theHUN wrote:
Sorry, I meant curl. It is more contrasty than Delta 400 for the same developing process (Rodinal, 1+60, 20 min). I'll post the curves once I have developed HP5 and Tri-X for the same recipe.
