Of note... IMO the Cron 50 v5 is wildly unappreciated nowadays. I shoot with it much more than my Lux 50 because the handling is perfect - focus throw and weighting is perfect, it always seems to nail focus, size is great, sharpness and boo-kay are just lovely.
dourbalistar wrote: rji2goleez wrotebestdayz wroteHow do you like the cinestill emulsions? Am interested in trying but no experience with daytime ones, only 800TI've shot both Cinestill 50 and 400 and really like them both. Here's a few examples of Cinestill 50D shot with the Samsung AF Slim Zoom. I have more examples scattered in the Film Images thread.@rji2goleez@@, I think you might have GAS.
We were washing our clothes after being on the road for a week when I was yelled at in Flemish by a somewhat unstable woman in Bruges while taking a picture of a laundromat window.
After many years of being a TMax or Trix-X user, the first couple of rolls of HP5+ have me intrigued. Wandered out with a tester roll this past weekend. Here are a few.
M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, Ilford HP5+ @ ISO 400, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
Construction Debris, SW 5th Ave, Beaverton, Oregon
Desmolicious wrote: madNbad wroteDesmolicious wroteNikon LiteTouch AF, HP5
It's time to do laundry when...
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53609516058_a770d2f67e_b.jpgWe were washing our clothes after being on the road for a week when I was yelled at in Flemish by a somewhat unstable woman in Bruges while taking a picture of a laundromat window.1. I don't blame her
B. This was an art piece - the undies were dipped in epoxy before mounted to the board. Or so the artist claims.
I think he brought them back from college like that.
madNbad wrote:
After many years of being a TMax or Trix-X user, the first couple of rolls of HP5+ have me intrigued. Wandered out with a tester roll this past weekend. Here are a few.
M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, Ilford HP5+ @ ISO 400, Film Photography Project FPP-76 1+1:
Construction Debris, SW 5th Ave, Beaverton, Oregon
Thanks! I did a little research before I started. Watched a David Hancock video but Stumbled across a site that had examples of what the film was developed, along with dilutions, times and even how often to agitate.
These were thirteen minutes, constant agitation for the first minute then ten seconds every minute. I'm pleased with the contrast, considering how flat the light was and most of all how good the grain looks.
I have a half liter of the FPP-76 left, then it's on to the XT-3!