Post your recent film shots!
p.1145 #1Post your recent film shots!
Oldwino wrote:
Leica CL / CV Heliar 40/2.8 / Luminar 100
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53512711806_5d7ccd1161_c.jpgCorner by Henry Beckmeyer, on Flickr
Luminar (Kodak Aerocolor Iv) really is a lovely film.
It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.
Leica CL / CV Heliar 40/2.8 / Luminar 100
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53512711806_5d7ccd1161_c.jpgCorner by Henry Beckmeyer, on Flickr
Luminar (Kodak Aerocolor Iv) really is a lovely film.
It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.
Feb 06, 2024 at 10:43 AM
p.1145 #2Post your recent film shots!
Sax45 wrote:
I found some decent weather to test my new Nikonos III (Nikkor 35mm f2.5). Shot at f11 around 2-3 seconds, rested on a fence.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZgyB74rCRhSwFyaY9
Edit: whoops, forgot the film. Tri-X!
So people can see it - love this shot! - I am posting here crediting you!
I found some decent weather to test my new Nikonos III (Nikkor 35mm f2.5). Shot at f11 around 2-3 seconds, rested on a fence.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZgyB74rCRhSwFyaY9
Edit: whoops, forgot the film. Tri-X!
So people can see it - love this shot! - I am posting here crediting you!
Feb 06, 2024 at 10:47 AM
p.1145 #3Post your recent film shots!
BenjaminSmith wrote:
All shots on a Canon Populaire with lens and film noted in photo caption. Still trying to nail development technique with Cinestill D96 monobath processing (it's meant to be a no-brainer, right?)
FYI films like Acros, Delta, Tmax need double the developing time in DF96 Monobath to clear the base fog.
All shots on a Canon Populaire with lens and film noted in photo caption. Still trying to nail development technique with Cinestill D96 monobath processing (it's meant to be a no-brainer, right?)
FYI films like Acros, Delta, Tmax need double the developing time in DF96 Monobath to clear the base fog.
Feb 06, 2024 at 10:50 AM
p.1145 #5Post your recent film shots!
Thanks Desmolicious!
New to the forum here. Without the paid membership, is there a way to post a photo in the comment the way everyone else is?
New to the forum here. Without the paid membership, is there a way to post a photo in the comment the way everyone else is?
Feb 06, 2024 at 11:16 AM
p.1145 #6Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Luminar (Kodak Aerocolor Iv) really is a lovely film.
It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.
There's a really informative article about it here: https://www.analog.cafe/r/santacolor-100-film-review-n4pm
I've shot two rolls with it over the past year but wasn't happy with the lab scans as the colors were very unnatural on most shots, but it turns out that's common due to the lack of orange mask. I now have my own scanner so will rescan the negatives to see if they come out better; I was able to color-correct the JPEG scans from my lab but it would be better to rescan.
Luminar (Kodak Aerocolor Iv) really is a lovely film.
It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.
There's a really informative article about it here: https://www.analog.cafe/r/santacolor-100-film-review-n4pm
I've shot two rolls with it over the past year but wasn't happy with the lab scans as the colors were very unnatural on most shots, but it turns out that's common due to the lack of orange mask. I now have my own scanner so will rescan the negatives to see if they come out better; I was able to color-correct the JPEG scans from my lab but it would be better to rescan.
Feb 06, 2024 at 11:49 AM
p.1145 #7Post your recent film shots!
Sax45 wrote:
Thanks Desmolicious!
New to the forum here. Without the paid membership, is there a way to post a photo in the comment the way everyone else is?
If you have a Flickr account, you could try this: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1369568
I'm sure there are workarounds for other platforms too.
Thanks Desmolicious!
New to the forum here. Without the paid membership, is there a way to post a photo in the comment the way everyone else is?
If you have a Flickr account, you could try this: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1369568
I'm sure there are workarounds for other platforms too.
Feb 06, 2024 at 11:51 AM
p.1145 #8Post your recent film shots!
My Grandson
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Kodak ProImage 100
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Kodak ProImage 100
Feb 06, 2024 at 12:27 PM
p.1145 #9Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
My Grandson
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Kodak ProImage 100
First pic is great! Others cute too, of course.
My Grandson
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Kodak ProImage 100
First pic is great! Others cute too, of course.
Feb 06, 2024 at 01:35 PM
p.1145 #10Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.There's a really informative article about it here: https://www.analog.cafe/r/santacolor-100-film-review-n4pm
I've shot two rolls with it over the past year but wasn't happy with the lab scans as the colors were very unnatural on most shots, but it turns out that's common due to the lack of orange mask. I now have my own scanner so will rescan the negatives to see if they come out better; I was able to color-correct the JPEG scans from my lab but it would be better to rescan.
I had no issues, but that is because I scan the film myself, and set the WB for each unique film type (saving it as a preset). I do that by using the WB dropper in a piece of the unexposed film.
It sounds like your lab did not accommodate for this film and just used a generic setting that they use for Kodak/Fuji etc.
Luminaire/Luminar (Kodak Aerocolor IV):
Edited on Feb 07, 2024 at 11:27 PM · View previous versions
Desmolicious wrote
Luminar (Kodak Aerocolor Iv) really is a lovely film.It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.
I've shot two rolls with it over the past year but wasn't happy with the lab scans as the colors were very unnatural on most shots, but it turns out that's common due to the lack of orange mask. I now have my own scanner so will rescan the negatives to see if they come out better; I was able to color-correct the JPEG scans from my lab but it would be better to rescan.
I had no issues, but that is because I scan the film myself, and set the WB for each unique film type (saving it as a preset). I do that by using the WB dropper in a piece of the unexposed film.
It sounds like your lab did not accommodate for this film and just used a generic setting that they use for Kodak/Fuji etc.
Luminaire/Luminar (Kodak Aerocolor IV):
Edited on Feb 07, 2024 at 11:27 PM · View previous versions
Feb 06, 2024 at 01:50 PM
|
p.1145 #11Post your recent film shots!
IMO Aerocolor IV has a pleasant peachy tone to it.
Edited on Feb 07, 2024 at 11:26 PM · View previous versions
Edited on Feb 07, 2024 at 11:26 PM · View previous versions
Feb 06, 2024 at 01:54 PM
p.1145 #12Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
[
I had no issues, but that is because I scan the film myself, and set the WB for each unique film type (saving it as a preset). I do that by using the WB dropper in a piece of the unexposed film.
It sounds like your lab did not accommodate for this film and just used a generic setting that they use for Kodak/Fuji etc.
That's probably right, although I've heard complaints from others about colors that seem far off. Here are a few examples of lab-scanned shots of Aerocolor IV:
The gravel path in this one was actually grey in real life but came out brick-red in their scan:
Parc des hirondelles by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
And this one has an orange cast that I see in many of the scans:
foot by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
This one came out better, but I think I did some color-correction in post:
Window cactus by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
[
I had no issues, but that is because I scan the film myself, and set the WB for each unique film type (saving it as a preset). I do that by using the WB dropper in a piece of the unexposed film.
It sounds like your lab did not accommodate for this film and just used a generic setting that they use for Kodak/Fuji etc.
That's probably right, although I've heard complaints from others about colors that seem far off. Here are a few examples of lab-scanned shots of Aerocolor IV:
The gravel path in this one was actually grey in real life but came out brick-red in their scan:
Parc des hirondelles by Brad Hurley, on FlickrAnd this one has an orange cast that I see in many of the scans:
foot by Brad Hurley, on FlickrThis one came out better, but I think I did some color-correction in post:
Window cactus by Brad Hurley, on FlickrFeb 06, 2024 at 02:45 PM
p.1145 #14Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
I had no issues, but that is because I scan the film myself, and set the WB for each unique film type (saving it as a preset). I do that by using the WB dropper in a piece of the unexposed film.
It sounds like your lab did not accommodate for this film and just used a generic setting that they use for Kodak/Fuji etc.That's probably right, although I've heard complaints from others about colors that seem far off. Here are a few examples of lab-scanned shots of Aerocolor IV:
The gravel path in this one was actually grey in real life but came out brick-red in their scan:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52943210711_de189b3261_c.jpgParc des hirondelles by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
And this one has an orange cast that I see in many of the scans:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52943597935_888f56036e_c.jpgfoot by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
This one came out better, but I think I did some color-correction in post:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53207545589_555d809bd9_c.jpgWindow cactus by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Yeah, the lab did not use a scanning conversion setting for the correct film. They most probably don't even have one.
If you want you can send me a film strip and I will scan/convert it w my Aerocolor IV preset.
Luminar/Aerocolor IV:
Edited on Feb 07, 2024 at 11:28 PM · View previous versions
Desmolicious wrote
[I had no issues, but that is because I scan the film myself, and set the WB for each unique film type (saving it as a preset). I do that by using the WB dropper in a piece of the unexposed film.
It sounds like your lab did not accommodate for this film and just used a generic setting that they use for Kodak/Fuji etc.
The gravel path in this one was actually grey in real life but came out brick-red in their scan:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52943210711_de189b3261_c.jpgParc des hirondelles by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
And this one has an orange cast that I see in many of the scans:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52943597935_888f56036e_c.jpgfoot by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
This one came out better, but I think I did some color-correction in post:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53207545589_555d809bd9_c.jpgWindow cactus by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Yeah, the lab did not use a scanning conversion setting for the correct film. They most probably don't even have one.
If you want you can send me a film strip and I will scan/convert it w my Aerocolor IV preset.
Luminar/Aerocolor IV:
Edited on Feb 07, 2024 at 11:28 PM · View previous versions
Feb 06, 2024 at 04:43 PM
p.1145 #15Post your recent film shots!
It is actually Aerocolor IV. Aerochrome was that cool infrared slide film.
Aerocolor does want to go slightly warm/peachy/magenta. It is a little tricky to correct. I have some frames that I just cannot get 100% "right".
Aerocolor does want to go slightly warm/peachy/magenta. It is a little tricky to correct. I have some frames that I just cannot get 100% "right".
Feb 06, 2024 at 04:55 PM
p.1145 #16Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53512711806_5d7ccd1161_c.jpgCorner by Henry Beckmeyer, on FlickrLuminar (Kodak Aerocolor Iv) really is a lovely film.
It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.
It is a pretty nice film, sometimes-strange-color-casts aside. I have shot some on 120; will post those up soon.
Oldwino wrote
Leica CL / CV Heliar 40/2.8 / Luminar 100https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53512711806_5d7ccd1161_c.jpgCorner by Henry Beckmeyer, on Flickr
It's a shame Kodak themselves never sold it in individual rolls, but I guess that was because they were marking up their current offerings as high as they could.
It is a pretty nice film, sometimes-strange-color-casts aside. I have shot some on 120; will post those up soon.
Feb 06, 2024 at 04:57 PM
p.1145 #17Post your recent film shots!
Oldwino wrote:
It is actually Aerocolor IV. Aerochrome was that cool infrared slide film.
Aerocolor does want to go slightly warm/peachy/magenta. It is a little tricky to correct. I have some frames that I just cannot get 100% "right".
You Sir, are correct! Meant to say aerocolor.
It is actually Aerocolor IV. Aerochrome was that cool infrared slide film.
Aerocolor does want to go slightly warm/peachy/magenta. It is a little tricky to correct. I have some frames that I just cannot get 100% "right".
You Sir, are correct! Meant to say aerocolor.
Feb 06, 2024 at 04:58 PM
p.1145 #18Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Aerocolor does want to go slightly warm/peachy/magenta. It is a little tricky to correct. I have some frames that I just cannot get 100% "right".You Sir, are correct! Meant to say aerocolor.
Man, do I wish we could still get fresh Aerochrome!
Oldwino wrote
It is actually Aerocolor IV. Aerochrome was that cool infrared slide film.Aerocolor does want to go slightly warm/peachy/magenta. It is a little tricky to correct. I have some frames that I just cannot get 100% "right".
Man, do I wish we could still get fresh Aerochrome!
Feb 06, 2024 at 04:59 PM
